Stockdale, evidence is good.

TM Admin

This idiot Stockdale continues to harass another poster.
He is bringing forward old quotes from the poster, some months old, republishing them without the dates as if they are current.
This poster has previously warned the poster he now harasses that he will continue to stalk them.

Here follows the url and 2 of today's 'crop' of 4 'new' posts, followed by the original threat.
TM are abetting him in his endeavours.
But first the original threat to harass from Stockdale directed at this poster on June 13th 2010.
It is no small point that the poster cybernana, who is a prolific trader on TM, should be able to use the boards according to her own will and not on the demands of a menacing, no trade, hate-site administrator.

You won't get away from old sleuth,cyber,no matter which thread you are on.Go back to bainaholics and see if you can answer any of those 10 questions I put to you yesterday.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 11:13 am, Sun 13 Jun #728

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Community/MessageBoard/Messages.aspx?id=132231&p=314&topic=7

cybernana wrote: Do you also believe a glass lens could have lain on that floor, close to where the body had been moved from, where Weir said he found it, and not been broken? With 4 days of people in there searching? Beats me how that could happen.
cyber,Weir made a note on his jobsheet that he found that lens under the toe of an ice skating boot.So that lens was more or less protected by that boot. But what puzzles me is that you have also said that lens was dusty,and so must have been there for a while.So you would also have to wonder why it had not been broken,having lain on the floor for so long. And you say four people were in there searching.But the whole house was a crime scene ,not just that room.
Edited by supersleuth at 8:57 am, Sat 5 Feb
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 8:55 am, Sat 5 Feb #15683

cybernana wrote:
Let me see... you have now accepted there was blood on the shoe, after denying it for so long. Now, see if you can find, from the transcript, which direction those blood spots landed from, I believe it was the wrong direction for it to have come from his own left side.
Well,in the Karam/Laws debate Karam said those blood spots were from Robin Bain's head wound,which was in his left temple. So what direction do you think they came from,cyber?.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 9:14 am, Sat 5 Feb #15684

cybernana wrote:
Was it noted on his drivers license? Was that produced in court? Who saw him driving in them the night before? Did the people who served him at the fish & chip shop testify they had seen him wearing them?
Yes,it was noted on David Bain's drivers licence that he needed to wear glasses when he was driving. But we don't know if he was wearing glasses when he was driving or not.He wasn't seen driving. And he may well have taken those glasses off before he went in to get those fish and chips.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 9:45 am, Sat 5 Feb #15685

Don't worry Stockdale - I'm only joking...

I have had no response to my last two complaints made to you regarding registered hate-site members, the TM posters superslueth and linz4me construct of using TM boards to lie in order to cause public harassment, and ridicule of David Bain. It's a serious issue. And if my letters weren't clear enough I apologise but I thought it was sufficiently clearly set out, that subject to your response, I would be considering seeking legal remedy from both the posters and TM (as vehicle, publisher, complicit and so forth.)

I set out my issues in writing as is required, I also offered TM the opportunity, to consider any material I am holding material to the issue by way of a frank discovery process in order to avoid wasting Court time with what is a blatant, and simple to follow trail linked to registered members of known hate-sites, one of those involved in fact being a site-administrator.

I had anticipated that tomorrow, the 26th of January 2011, was sufficient time for the legal implications of TM's position with these 2 posters and others like them to be researched and made clear. However, because I had not determined in my correspondence with you a specific date I now nominate close of work on Monday 31st January as that time.

Yours sincerely

Don't worry Stockdale, you're far from forgotten.

I am happy to give you a reasonable amount of time to deal with my complaint dated the 15/1/11 though my position remains unchanged as to seeking legal remedy if required because I have a very strong case which I believe is in the Public Interest. As a matter of note I have now been able to research the 'source' of Stockdale's 'evidence' and it is bogus, absolutely untrue.

In the meantime and separately, the following is entirely offensive to Joe Karam and the defence team and more particularly to David Bain himself. That these disgusting comments should be aired on a public message board by the administrator of a hate-site currently being sued for many allegations of defamation on the same matter beggars belief. Please disabuse yourself from any thought that Stockdale is anything more than a liar intent on persecuting David Bain and others by the use of lies and in other way possible.
This 'person' has been subject to a complaint to the Police for harassment of another TM member and that this further and public harassment should have a place on TM message boards is frankly unbelievable.
I have already provided you with evidence (and the offer of more detailed evidence should you require) showing that Stockdale has deliberately posted false information on TM boards 100s of times in order to persuade public opinion against David Bain being compensated, and that in part, that also includes defaming at length Joe Karam.
In this disgusting piece below Stockdale prints that either Joe Karam is not aware of the evidence of a particular witness (which Stockdale, the idiot, thinks is conclusive but which was rejected by a Jury as material to their deliberation) or, as by implication, that Karam does not care and is therefore dishonest.
As you will note the quote is cut and pasted by Stockdale and is in fact an original quote attributable to him.
As always I have all the information cached and on hand regarding this or any earlier complaint, particularly mine of the 15/1/11.
I am looking forward to your prompt response on these matters.


http://www.trademe.co.nz/Community/MessageBoard/Messages.aspx?id=132231&p=312&topic=7

supersleuth wrote:
So what does Karam think of David's aunt's evidence,I wonder. I mean,you have to say it is quite compelling. Karam would have known not too long after he started looking into the case that David Bain had told his lawyer that he was going to attest to wearing his mother's glasses.And Mrs Clark's evidence was presented at the Court of Appeal hearings. So he would have known about David wearing his mother's glasses fairly early on. I mean,it is obvious to me that Jan Clark is telling the truth. David eyes were troubling him,and she went to get up and fetch his glasses,and he told her his were in being repaired and that he had been wearing an old pair of his mother's glasses. They weren't perfect ,he said,but they got him by. So I would like to ask Mr Karam a couple of questions? "Do you accept that David Bain was wearing his mother's glasses on the weekend of the murders?" If he anwers yes,as I feel ,realistically he must,then I would ask him "Then isn't it reasonable to suggest that they were damaged because David was in a struggle with Stephen,given the fact that the lens that was missing from those glasses was found in Stephen's room?".
!!!!
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 10:03 am, Mon 17 Jan #15562

superidiot, count your pennies......

And that point re Laniets gurgling is well made.If David Bain did hear her gurgling when he arrived home,then you could say he was partly responsible for her death by not calling the emergency services immediatly.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 10:57 am, Sat 15 Jan #15519

The latest from the idiot, an admission that fiddler Taylor immediately tried to correct. But he Stockdale said it. Saved, thanks superidiot.

Meathead Mike Stockdale having a bad day....

I can understand why you thought it had time to go through it's cycle,because you thought the police did not find Arawa's body until 6.50am,instead of which they actually found her body about 17 minutes before that. And do you also accept that it wasn't face paint on Stephen,just a small piece of red from a pencil,and a small speck of paint from a nearby desk.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 6:27 pm, Wed 12 Jan #15324

Old lunk head thinks the Police discovered Arawa's body before they even arrived at the house. Good boy lunk head, you're doing well - soon you'll be famous world-wide as a lying idiot. They'll be replacing clowns heads of ping pong ball games in side shows to be mirror images of you and thousands of ping pong balls will be disappearing down your big gob everyday. It'll be payback for the world after all the crap you've spouted, if you left NZ tomorrow the insanity levels here would fall by 3000%. You must be so proud, coming from humble beginnings as office boy to being a world class lunkhead moron.

Mike Stockdale's confession, that he's a boring idiot...

Mike Stockdale
I guess I am the only person he is complaining about now.But does he actually get in touch with TradeMe?.As if they would take any notice of him.So it has probably reached a bit of a stalemate.I post on Trade Me,and probably very few people... bother to look at what I post,as most of it is repetitious,just a big yawn.And no's posts on his blog,which I would think hardly anybody looks at.Did anybody watch that oldies group singing on tv a couple of weeks ago?."Should I stay or should I go?".Mind you I don't really want to know

Don't be such a pessimist Stockdale, surely it must be important to the world for you to repeat from both ends. What's that lady's name again, you know - the one about the glasses, you bleeding dickh..d.

Something for Stockdale

Dear Trade Me Support

The poster superslueth who happens to be site-administrator for one of the hate-sites being sued for defamation continues to bait, stalk and harass other posters. He has dragged from the archives an old thread in which he daily addresses a second poster cybernana who has not posted on that thread since July 23rd last year. As the result of this the poster cybernana seems to have stopped or curtailed posting anywhere. I remind you that Stockdale (superslueth) and others from his site have for a long period of time stalked other posters, their families, even the Jury. By giving this 'man' the freedom to continue his campaign on your boards your are complicit in their activities, if you are not assisting with their campaign their board usage should be stopped. Furthermore, the only enduring Bain threads are 'bumped' or posted on by members of the hate-sites under the control of Stockdale. The main participants being Trevor William Fox (luckytrader - previously banned stalker) and Rachael Membery (a donkey lover.) I am aware there is another hearing between the parties to the defamation next month, I would assume that TM by now would appreciate the importance of distancing itself from those that have used their boards for a long time to harass and stalk other posters by attempting to 'justify' the defamatory comment that has led to the accusations against them in the Auckland High Court. Besides this, it is plain that Stockdale is little more than a rambling idiot and a risk to public sanity.

Below is the thread url and posts made today by Stockdale which give an example of his deliberate harassment.


http://www.trademe.co.nz/Community/MessageBoard/Messages.aspx?id=132231&p=304&topic=7

cybernana wrote:
He probably just guessed that Laniet was alive before she was shot, good guess I would say. Same goes for Robin. In fact, I suspect all 5 of them were alive before they were shot.
I agree,cyber,all five of them,including Robin,were alive before they were shot.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 8:24 am, Sun 9 Jan #15170

cybernana wrote:
"Mr Sanderson said he was originally asked by police if David could have worn his mother's glasses "and the penny dropped". Like his mother David was myopic, making it difficult to see into a distance."
Now, why would he want to see into a distance that morning? weren't the shots mostly at point blank range?
Yes,most of the shots were from close range,cyber,but David Bain still needed glasses to get from A to B. As he told his aunt,that old pair of his mother's glasses that he was wearing weren't perfect,but they got him by.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 8:47 am, Sun 9 Jan #15171

Just to highlight this little pearler, and an outstanding breakthrough by the idiot. I don't think anybody ever thought of that - that they were alive before they were dead.


I agree,cyber,all five of them,including Robin,were alive before they were shot.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 8:24 am, Sun 9 Jan #15170

How big a moron is Mike Stockdale? This is not a competition because nobody could beat him.

Indeed, he's a very big moron. He such a big moron that he's still having conversations with cybernana on the Bainholics thread on TM even though she hasn't posted there since the 23rd of July 2010.

Now that's a big moron you've got to hand it to him. Seeing it's the new year, I think it will be alright for him to ring Mrs Clark and tell her what she said, 3017 times. I think it will also be appropriate for him to ring Hentschel and tell him what a bser he was for telling Mike there was no blood in the rifle barrel and that there was no blood spatter of one of Robin's children found on his right shoe. Because now that Mike knows that there was blood in the barrel and brain matter of somebody (excluding Robin) on the father's shoe he's confident that the blood couldn't have got on Robin's shoe from his suicide, which is exactly why the Jury found David innocent, and maybe in another 16 years and after 50,000 times of telling anyone that will listen (including those not there, having left 6 months ago) he'll work out how big a moron he really is.

Face it Stockdale....

even your own mates know you're an idiot and a welcher, having long ago accepted that you're a liar and a sicko.

What other titles are you going for, fiddler of year?

Addendum to 'Looking for Responsible Journalism' below

As an addendum to the original message below and to show the general irrelevance of the posts and threads starting by Stockdale, the hate-site administrator, 45 of the last 57 posts of the Bainholics thread have been by Stockdale himself. They include deletions to which he claimed were 'experiments' that 'happened' to co-incide with him 'achieving' the 15,000th post on that thread. They also include weather reports as he converses with himself in the absence of anyone showing interest. The value of this man's contribution is zero when compared to the lies and propaganda he spreads. Pull the plug on the fool and leave him to post his crap on his own 'secret' site or the walls of the psychiatric institution he's soon sure to be enclosed in.

Cheers.

Parker's right hand man dingbat Stockdale popping in to say hello to himself and give a weather report....

So the defence said"Let's not watse all this money",did they cyber?
I don't know how one watse's money,but no doubt you can explain that.
But I tell you what,I don't think David will be wanting a public airing of all those lies he has told,I don't think he will want to have a bar of that.

Edited by supersleuth at 2:04 pm, Tue 28 Dec

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 2:00 pm, Tue 28 Dec #15006
Just thought I would pop in and say hullo,I am busy on another thread at the moment.
The weather is much improved from yesterday,light winds and sunny.

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 9:32 am, Wed 29 Dec #15007

This on a thread he recovered from the distant archives and where he has made 45 of the last 57 posts including a number of deletes so that he could 'just realise' that the thread had reached 15,000 posts. What a sad sack piece of crap.

Goodboy Stockdale, finally working out to delete your fiddly side.

The member deleted this message.


supersleuth (0 ) 10:02 pm, Sun 26 Dec #14989
Sorry about all the deletes,just practising a new procedure.

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 10:06 pm, Sun 26 Dec #14990

What a relief for superidiot, only about 16 posts...

in a row until one of his pedo pal supporters came along. But lets look at what the idiot is saying now. First of all he claimed there was no blood spatter on Robin's shoe now he admits there is...

Those three pinhead size bloodspots could not have gotten on to Robin Bain's shoe from him committing suicide.

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 10:03 am, Sun 26 Dec #14980

And also superidiot admits they couldn't have got there during the suicide. Brilliant, and that superidiot is why the Jury decided that to have his children's blood and brain spatter on his shoe meant that he was the killer.

Simple if you're not a superidiot.

Feeling depressed Mike, people think you're an idiot? Just ignore them, make a couple of hundred posts about what Mrs Clark said, that should make you feel better you moron.

Need a clue Stockdale?......

Not quite the 'expert' you thought you were eh Stockdale?

On the first question a clue is there were more than two and less than a thousand fleas on the dog's butt on April 1st 1993.

And as to the question as to how many lumps were left after the dog's ablutions on the morning of the fiddler's suicide it was less than 15.

Hope that's of some help to you bigoted, idiot, arsew..., fiddler apologist.

I've got some questions for you Stockdale if you reckon you're the authority on the Bain case..

How many fleas did the dog have on its hairy dog's butt on April 1st 1993?

Where was the last place the dog excreted on the morning of the Robin's suicide and how many lumps were there?

Come on Stockdale, if you're such as expert those questions will be easy for you hound dog bro from the 'fiddling few' pack.

The last plank of sanity has finally fallen from the bewildering mind of Mike Stockdale...

What is the correct spelling of the dog's name?.
Which member of the family did the dog belong to?
How old was the dog at the time of the murders?.
How many puppies did the dog have in it's last litter?.
What was the breed of the dog?.

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 9:12 am, Thu 23 Dec #14940


Above he is attemping to prove how much he knows about the dog in order to prove how much he knows about the kiddie fiddler father bro.

Heck, and gosh. Stockdale is annoyed......

I guess what annoys me the most is how the pro David Bainers take the rest of us for a bunch of idiots.

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 8:25 am, Thu 16 Dec #14818

You got it Mike, a bunch of idiots...still trying to pretend a strip search didn't happen. Why not put some money up Stockdale, you saved some money by welching on Kent Parker and Vicky Parker - put some money up Stockdale. How does $5,000 sound? You lose you pay $5,000 and declare finally that you are what you are, an idiot. Additionally, the 'oral' swab isn't evidence to this point because it came from Kennard (accused fiddler) and maybe part of the oral fascination you and he have with one another behind the bike sheds.

Show some courage Stockdale, you've dined out on lies and idiocy, front up with a $5,000 bet if you're not a idiot pedo-supporter.

For the record.

I note te-aroha having an argument with Mike Stockdale over a number of issues on the old resurrected bainholics thread that Stockdale dragged back from the dead in order to 'circumvent' his promise to the poster project_hr that should pro not post on the Bain threads then Stockdale wouldn't. Firstly project_hr, in my opinion, shouldn't have accepted either the challenge of the word of Stockdale who has proven himself to be a liar many times. Of course Stockdale plainly broke his word or the spirit on their intention and merely chose another 'disused' thread because TM keep shutting down his attempts to launch a 'new and brighter' Bain thread in which he could repeat his tired old lies and inform everyone of what they thought and what they knew. Stockdale is not only a pedo-supporter but also a fraud and someone who thinks that is fine for a father to instruct a child to put fingers inside themselves. That still rates as the sickest TM post of all time I believe, a sick post by a sick minded individual.

But to the breast of their argument that David was or was not searched. Detective Sergeant Doyle said he was while another officer gave evidence of taking possession of the samples, so clearly Stockdale is lying his head off. In essence the strip search or lack of it was important to the hangbainers because it allowed the suggestion that David had the chest injuries on the morning of the murders/suicide when clearly he did not. Further to this was the effort to blame the now deceased Doctor for not doing his job properly, something the hangbainers would do without consideration for one dead man to protect the 'reputation' of another dead man who highly probably was a kiddie-fiddler. Stockdale objects to this, lies about it and I think the reason for that is clear.

Another issue of their argument is the blood in the rifle which Stockdale recorded as being a myth, refused a public bet on the issue and when finally unable to resist the truth said that it didn't matter anyway. When of course it does matter, it proves suicide, blood didn't fall into the barrel, it was drawn into the barrel by vacuum and Judge Pankhurst commented about that phenomenon because he clearly understood the proof it levered against the dead man with one or more of his family's blood on his right shoe, his battered hands and the blood smears he had on his hands. Stockdale is interested in the truth only in the 'protection' of a dead bro and I wonder how many of the 'sisters' are bros as was Robin Bain - certainly, Fox, Rodie, Stockdale, Wanakafan and others have all given indication that they are motivated to hide the paedophilia aspect of Robin's life.

Stockdale, and te-aroha has objected, claims that I was involved in arranging a 'meeting' with Stockdale but didn't front. I've never spoken to the man, have nothing in common with him and in fact, as is probably abundantly clear, consider him at least to be a pedo-supporter and I have no truck with such people. There is no reason why I should want to meet somebody that disgusts me for his attitude toward children, I think he sucks. I do however include him among those that I hope to see in Court or brought to task for their behaviour not only the defaming but the deliberate stalking Stockdale undertook against a female board member and which I have the evidence of. Stockdale and the others need to be investigated and brought to task. Stockdale has bragged about funding Kent Parker then reneged on the money he promised. Stockdale is recorded as stalking on several different sites he thought were 'safe' and others he should have known weren't. The man is an idiot, lies are his currency and his true secrets will out in the fullness of time.