It's official, the sisters don't want to come to Court.

They don't want to front up. They don't even want to be questioned about their stalking, and low and behold stalking has become 'free speech' and 'heated debate.' It hasn't occurred to the sisters that to defend an allegation of harassment by saying the harassment was actually a debate and an issue of free speech denies the fact that it takes at least 2 parties to debate an issue. Of course when one of those parties is not part of the 'debate' it can no longer be called a debate. And when you look more closely at what the 'debate' was - threatening to go to people's homes, discussing the children and spouses of other Trade Me members, discussing having children 'removed' from their parents or a wife 'saved' from her husband by a bunch of nutters you see that it is not really a debate at all.
Looking at the record, they're all members of hate-sites, associates. Annette Curran began the family stalking and it was carried on by Christine Williams and others, including Glenda OBrein who 'approached' the Sensible Sentencing Trust to get me put in prison. Silly Glenda, Christine and Annette, they all left a trail as to the essence of the real 'debate' and freedom of speech. And the pedo pals, Stockdale, Kennard and Fox were busy apologists for paedophilia, whilst stalking the jury and crown witnesses, or indeed anybody who challenged their right of 'free speech' to lie about David Bain or anybody they felt supported him.
And of course now, they don't want to come to Court to explain themselves. Explain what my children or family have to do with the filthy pervo members of hate-sites, or indeed why my family is any of their business. Stockdale doesn't want to explain how it happens that somebody just sent him my address, or what proof he has that I phoned him and arranged to meet him. Kennard doesn't want to explain how he debated with me in my absence, or what information he was relying on when he published that I had tracked down one of his former wifes and found out from her that he had been accused of offence against his own family. He doesn't want to explain how I would even know his ex wife, or even her name and what the point of finding her overseas could possibly be.
Well, anyway their names are now lodged in Court documents soon to attended by the names of Glenda OBrein, Annette Curran, Christine Williams and other associates of the stalkers, and will remain there until it is defined whether or not stalking children or jurors is indeed 'free speech' or if a 'debate' can be held with a person in their absence. Absence, yes, how brave they have been, now they plea for absence rather than face their victims. Front up cowards, show your mettle, come to the line I have drawn to protect my family and dare cross it cowards of the night, you snickering messengers of hate. Come out and explain to the Courts your stalking and hate.

Hey guys, you've got mail...

All the best with that.

A passing deadline.

Some who have read here before will recall the bets I offered Mike Stockdale and Taylor from the hate-sites over evidence they had lied about for years, I offered them fairly big money to provide the evidence of no strip search of David, no intimate samples and that the father's blood and brain matter wasn't found inside the rifle. Like typical cowards they wouldn't take the bets and eventually the truth was published direct from the transcript and other Court documents to show Stockdale, Taylor, Kennard, Fox and a host of others were just blatant liars, hate-siters spreading a message of hate.

But despite been outed as liars in this way they continued in the same vein, publishing their lies on TM with TM either complicit or acting out a fantasy and trying to hold a line that they are not a publisher and not responsible for what the hate-siters have done with their lies and stalking. Unfortunately TM have permanently hooked themselves because of inconsistency in responding to complaints and inconsistency with what the law requires. But the hate-siters, short on concentration as they are, pulled back a few times - then as time passed, emboldened, continued where they left off. Most recently they've tried subtlety but the Courts have no truck with that.

I gave Stockdale and the others notice here that I would take them to Court to stop what they've done with relative impunity for a long time, they slowed down, fell to silence and then crept back. Finally, I put them and TM on notice that the line was drawn in the sand at 5pm today. I posted comment here earlier that I was only joking or bluffing about it, but reality is you can't bluff with stalkers - they have to be confronted face on and brought to task, brought out into the light and be observed speaking their lies. Of course I was never joking or bluffing about it and 5 pm has passed without notice.

So, at least 2 in the South Island and one in the North will have 'you have mail' thoughts on their mind - the popular words of Kalnovitch (O Brien) and Golfergold (Curran) from the past, 2 like many others as I finally screen the paper work were often mentioned in the past and who are not forgotten now for their stalking and lies.

And for those of you who thought you were above the law, entitled to defame, harass and stalk others - remember this is just a preliminary step, a first round that you won't like very much and which may well lead onto other Judicial 'joys' for you. That was a bad mistake you made when you stalked my family and an even worse one when you didn't slink back into the shadows when you were told. So now we see what you are really made of, if you have any mettle or are simply full of shit and hate.

Look, the 3 Fiddlerteers

now think that subtlety will save their sorry arses....

nx wrote:
Oh, so Weirs book is finally out
Nope.Wrong person,wrong book.So much for your powers of deduction.Have another guess.
Edited by supersleuth at 4:30 pm, Sun 30 Jan
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 4:27 pm, Sun 30 Jan #15625

supersleuth wrote:
Nope.Wrong person,wrong book.So much for your powers of deduction.
definitely not a super sleuth there ss
Quote
linz4me (282 ) 4:30 pm, Sun 30 Jan #15626

Must be McNeish's fairy tale then
Quote
nx (633 ) 5:23 pm, Sun 30 Jan #15627

nx wrote:
Must be McNeish's fairy tale then
Wrong AGAIN !! Geez. The Police Complaints Authority would not find hundreds of errors, omissions and misrepresentations in Sir James McNeish's excellent non-fiction book, would they. Keep trying. We're patient. (even though a budgie got the correct answer ages ago ... but, that's OK).
Edited by lucky_trader at 7:25 pm, Sun 30 Jan
Quote
lucky_trader (1373 ) 7:16 pm, Sun 30 Jan #15628

Sorry girls, the implication of what you don't dare say is defamation and harassment you dirty arsewi... But of course I'm only joking, just having a bit of fun.

Thanks for the addresses for service supplied by your own, but I already had them. What a bit of fun, I feel like eating 2 minties - sort of like what the heck fellas or fellowettes as you prefer to be.

Interview with Lynley Dodd, author of A City Possessed...

Recorded, at 11.15 am on Radio Live today. First of all I should note that there is little held opinion abroad that Peter Ellis, of the infamous Christchurch Creche case, is anything other than innocent. Lynley Dodd, rather than take a neutral position in her book, expressed throughout that Peter Ellis was innocent displaying why. She still however presented all the 'evidence' including background information that shows how shaky the conviction was and indeed that charges should never have been laid.

After a introduction by way of interview, Lynley took calls from listeners, but for one, they all had information supporting Lynley's point of view. The one that didn't cited 2 pieces of 'evidence' against Peter Ellis that simply didn't exist, once Lynley had explained that, the caller was prevented from making his third (no doubt false) allegation. It was probably prudent to cut the caller off but by doing so was missed the opportunity of asking direct questions as to who his sources were, who he was and his relationship to his 'sources' - indeed why he was making false allegations so many years after the original event when, as has been described, that Peter has had a 'people's Pardon.'

Of course the 'people's Pardon' is not enough for Peter and he pushes ahead for not only a Royal Pardon but accountability for those that stole years of his life from him. Consider for a moment that Radio Live took the prudent course and cut off the message of hate by the caller making false allegations and compare that to Trade Me, hosting members of hate-sites that continue to publish false statements against David Bain and Joe Karam almost 2 years after the trial where David was acquitted. It was only recently that Trade Me began a 'unsuccessful' position of banning Stockdale and others from bringing unsubstantiated 'claims' from the hate-sites and posting them on TM as though they were facts.

That's why I'm joking around, just fooling, foxing with the suggestion that I'm going to take Stockdale, Kennard, Fox and Trade Me to Court. But don't take me seriously folks because it is probably important for the world to hear the drivelling bs coming from the mouths of these 'men' and have it published on line. And when they're not in Court because I'm bluffing, I hope they'll think about the Peter Ellis case and consider how Peter was framed in the same way as David was, and how even years later a few wackos continue to invent and peddle hate and lies in public - dirty, fiddling, witch, bros.

To the Three Fiddlerteers, Stockdale, Kennard and Fox...

he's something that couldn't be happening, something I'm only joking or bluffing about....

I wonder who those 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents might be?

24/In consideration of this application I ask the Court to consider what benefit is lost for the public good if the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents are prevented from lying publicly about a case in which they are not involved, or lying about a case in which has already been dealt with by the Court and which the Respondents promote no public interest but rather bring deliberate disquiet upon the Judicial System and individuals they target for harassment. And for further consideration of whether the efforts of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents
are in fact in Contempt of Court because due process continues and may ultimately be brought back to the Courts for a ruling on denial of due process or some other matter regarding the remedy of a Miscarriage of Justice.

25/I also ask for consideration of the results of careless, negligent publication of deliberate misinformation being allowed to continue ad infinitum and which causes people (myself and others) to be stalked and harassed for not remaining silent, and for not being permissive in the face of harassment and hate-filled messages and ask the question where but the Courts should the final place of remedy be for those harassed, defamed and stalked with or without tort?

Hey 'Fiddlerteers' do you reckon I've put off to Monday what I could do today?

Kennard, Stockdale, Fox and TM - the paperwork is ready bros.
What fun.
But I'm joking aren't I, either that or bluffing? Surely, I wouldn't have any evidence coming from your own rotten dog-breath mouths? Would I?
You'll like the paperwork, you'll be so happy and beside yourselves. And a big trip to Auckland to boot. It's so jolly I feel like eating a minty, which reminds me to tell Kennard that he can't drink turps in Court, neither can Fox laugh hysterically every time Stockdale farts. Apart from that just act normal to complete the picture of what arse..pes you are.