Showing posts with label Lindsay Gurnard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lindsay Gurnard. Show all posts
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Hey Lindsay Kennard, Gurnard bum.....
I have it on good authority that Scott Watson doesn't like kiddie fiddlers either, so butt out fish bum. You should get the picture, pedo's aren't popular. Don't fly you're pedo flag for Scott Watson, get on your bike pal.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Kennard again.....
in his own words saying why he has used TM to get his persecutionary message across in respect of David Bain....
8456. lyl_guy wrote: Here's a thought. Why not discuss the case through your private facebook page (you have one don't you?) and not allow RB to join?? Simple. This thread needs to go... it's outlived it's worth, and is just full of threats and counter-threats, nothing productive.
I agree totally, but the advantage of TradeMe is the high traffic of New Zealanders who read the forums where as FaceBook (yes a page exists) has a more limited audience and a more limited demographic audience. http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=109670334813&ref=m f
by linz4me on 11:30 am, 01 Jun 2010
Later I'll post the trail as to how the deliberate lie of 'no strip search' and 'no intimate test' became a fact due to the efforts of the redoubtable and 'honest' Kennard...
I probably won't bother with the incest allegations against him (in his own words,) overall he has simply used such things to show his superior and 'personal' knowledge with the absurd approach that a heart attack victim would know more than the Doctor about heart disease and treatments than the Surgeon who attended him or her.
8456. lyl_guy wrote: Here's a thought. Why not discuss the case through your private facebook page (you have one don't you?) and not allow RB to join?? Simple. This thread needs to go... it's outlived it's worth, and is just full of threats and counter-threats, nothing productive.
I agree totally, but the advantage of TradeMe is the high traffic of New Zealanders who read the forums where as FaceBook (yes a page exists) has a more limited audience and a more limited demographic audience. http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=109670334813&ref=m f
by linz4me on 11:30 am, 01 Jun 2010
Later I'll post the trail as to how the deliberate lie of 'no strip search' and 'no intimate test' became a fact due to the efforts of the redoubtable and 'honest' Kennard...
I probably won't bother with the incest allegations against him (in his own words,) overall he has simply used such things to show his superior and 'personal' knowledge with the absurd approach that a heart attack victim would know more than the Doctor about heart disease and treatments than the Surgeon who attended him or her.
Kennard gets upset and denys that Chris Watson, father of Scot, ever told Kennard to zip up his lips...
Lindsay R. Kennard
I haven't posted much on TM but yes it has gone nasty just a bit of the rails, I simply struggle with how some can believe what they post it so off the scale, its starting at the other side again. It was just a bit of light relief for me as I have worked extensively on R v Watson but a nut case arrived on that with wild and wacky scenarios, but have stepped back at Chris Watsons request.
about 7 months ago · Report
I as far as possible avoid the Scott Watson Thread as there is an ongoing police investigation into breaches of suppression involved in some of the posts made. The real strange thing is Trademe will not remove them even though they face prosecution for contempt as well and complaints have been made to Trademe by the people named, Keith and Chris. Also Chris asked me to not reply to things there as things are moving but moving slowly, I would have though a conviction for contempt of court would be serious for a media company. So I can only surmise that the threat of a defamation where there is at best a 50/50 chance is more terrifying than the 100% chance of conviction if the Solicitor General authorises charges of contempt or if the police decide to lay informations on breaches of suppression of names and evidence. There are some 16 breaches none have been removed. Explain to me why?
by linz4me on 05:27 pm, 02 Aug 2010
wrote:
If this thread bothers you so much why do you read it?, is it just an excuse to belittle and bully the OP? I just don't understand why people read this thread and turn negative
I don't read it but I do respect the right to privacy of Chris and Bev Watson who have tried everything to stop RdB posting information from stolen files. This has been doing on at various sites for close on 10 years. He has been contacting the Hope family with screwball ideas they, the Smarts and the Watson have been at times traumatised by the hairbrained things he has done and said. An illegal copy was made of a Department of Courts CD was made which had been legitimately with a third person with the stipulation no copies were to be made as the CD contains full files of suppressed names and documents from Scott's trial. The one thing RdB does not have it the information about which names or files are suppressed. He has been asked time and time again to stop using the material as it breaches suppressions and Copyright. He says he answers to a higher Authority God, quite frankly that is a load of heifer dust as the Authority he claims is not in the habit of requiring the law to be broken in fact exactly the opposite There is a command to obey those in authority over you in the world. I have taken the time to explain so you can understand why some get very upset at the continual refusal to abide by Chris Watson's request to all stop posting about the matter at this time as inquiries are under way after the GG petition, there are at least two IPCA inquiries under way, Chris just does not have the time to keep looking on line for breaches of suppression as he is the one ultimately responsible to ensure the CD was protected and he could face criminal charges as well. Not all publicity is good publicity.
by linz4me on 12:10 pm, 07 Aug 2010
By my count that's at least 3 times Kennard was asked to shut his yap - because it was doing no good, but he had to keep going showing what a great 'supporter' he was and impress others with insider knowledge and 'lawyering.'
I haven't posted much on TM but yes it has gone nasty just a bit of the rails, I simply struggle with how some can believe what they post it so off the scale, its starting at the other side again. It was just a bit of light relief for me as I have worked extensively on R v Watson but a nut case arrived on that with wild and wacky scenarios, but have stepped back at Chris Watsons request.
about 7 months ago · Report
I as far as possible avoid the Scott Watson Thread as there is an ongoing police investigation into breaches of suppression involved in some of the posts made. The real strange thing is Trademe will not remove them even though they face prosecution for contempt as well and complaints have been made to Trademe by the people named, Keith and Chris. Also Chris asked me to not reply to things there as things are moving but moving slowly, I would have though a conviction for contempt of court would be serious for a media company. So I can only surmise that the threat of a defamation where there is at best a 50/50 chance is more terrifying than the 100% chance of conviction if the Solicitor General authorises charges of contempt or if the police decide to lay informations on breaches of suppression of names and evidence. There are some 16 breaches none have been removed. Explain to me why?
by linz4me on 05:27 pm, 02 Aug 2010
wrote:
If this thread bothers you so much why do you read it?, is it just an excuse to belittle and bully the OP? I just don't understand why people read this thread and turn negative
I don't read it but I do respect the right to privacy of Chris and Bev Watson who have tried everything to stop RdB posting information from stolen files. This has been doing on at various sites for close on 10 years. He has been contacting the Hope family with screwball ideas they, the Smarts and the Watson have been at times traumatised by the hairbrained things he has done and said. An illegal copy was made of a Department of Courts CD was made which had been legitimately with a third person with the stipulation no copies were to be made as the CD contains full files of suppressed names and documents from Scott's trial. The one thing RdB does not have it the information about which names or files are suppressed. He has been asked time and time again to stop using the material as it breaches suppressions and Copyright. He says he answers to a higher Authority God, quite frankly that is a load of heifer dust as the Authority he claims is not in the habit of requiring the law to be broken in fact exactly the opposite There is a command to obey those in authority over you in the world. I have taken the time to explain so you can understand why some get very upset at the continual refusal to abide by Chris Watson's request to all stop posting about the matter at this time as inquiries are under way after the GG petition, there are at least two IPCA inquiries under way, Chris just does not have the time to keep looking on line for breaches of suppression as he is the one ultimately responsible to ensure the CD was protected and he could face criminal charges as well. Not all publicity is good publicity.
by linz4me on 12:10 pm, 07 Aug 2010
By my count that's at least 3 times Kennard was asked to shut his yap - because it was doing no good, but he had to keep going showing what a great 'supporter' he was and impress others with insider knowledge and 'lawyering.'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)