one Angel of our time,
messenger of hope.
free, to hold goodwill, care for others,
to touch the damned and blessed alike -
watching there, where the wretched of heart fall
to cry or weep, or spit foul anger,
to offer a hand.
bringing with her, each of us,
into another world
for where we search
the final sands of life.
I've started this blog to share with those that may be interested in sports, books, topical news and the justice system as it applies to cyberspace and generally.
Showing posts with label Gabrielle Giffords. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gabrielle Giffords. Show all posts
Monday, January 24, 2011
Monday, January 10, 2011
Gabrielle Giffords v Sarah Palin
When Sarah Palin spoke about Gabrielle during the Congressional campaign for last months election she at one stage identified Gabrielle as one of the Democratic members of Congress she wanted to see defeated in the mid-term elections. At one stage Palin's face book page featured cross-hair symbols superimposed over the constituencies of Gabrielle and others. Cross-hair being the scope sight of a rifle to bring to bear a target. Palin told voters 'don't retreat, reload.'
A Republican candidate Jessie Kelly in June 2010 invited voters to join him and shoot a fully automatic M16 rifle, urging them to 'get on target' and help 'remove' Gabrielle from office. Gabrielle herself said that she was Palin's targeted list, saying 'the way she has it depicted has the cross-hairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they have to realise there are consequences to that action.'
Gabrielle drew the ire of the right wing conservatives, called the tea party, for her support of health care law approved in the House of Representatives in March. Later her offices were vandalised and been the target of protesters. Sarah Palin listed Gabrielle's seat as one of the top 'targets' because of Gabrielle support for the health care reform.
Gabrielle was shot in the head and survives on life support. Yesterday Palin took down the offending graphic from her website and offered her condolences. A Republican representative Trent Franks urged caution to in ascribing political motives for the shooting. While Sheriff Clarence Dupnik suggested that 'vitriol' in recent political discourse might be connected to the shootings. Saying, 'this may be free speech, but it's not without consequences.'
I agree with the Sheriff's view. I can't agree with any effort to disconnect from incitement to 'target' a political opponent using a telescopic sight to make the point, or the request to join a candidate to help remove a political opponent from office by joining the candidate in shooting a fully loaded M16. Any reasonable person must have know that it was an appeal to other volatile nut cases and not the language of a Democracy. I hadn't followed this until today, mainly because any mention of Sarah Palin raises astonishment that she is taken seriously. My only interest is rather macabre in that there is something fascinating about the prospect she could take a whole country in and become President when she a light weight thinker of no substance.
At the very least I hope it is the end of her political career, her departure would hopefully stop the freefall into the word imagery and the incitement to violence her rhetoric relys upon. And at the best I hope she is charged, along with the ex-marine Kelly, for incitement to commit murder (for the death of the others - who included a Judge) because I think the link is clear, and I don't believe it has to be a traditional incitement because any reasonable person would know because of the unrest over the health care bill, inciting others to shoot somebody out of office or to look at them through cross-hairs was likely to find home in the head of another nutter willing to be called to arms and not 'retreat, but reload.'
What a sad moment in time, firstly for Gabrielle and for the American people to see the underbelly so willingly appealed to by political aspirants in a free country and against somebody with the courage to reach out to the poor and caution for moderation of language and temperance.
A Republican candidate Jessie Kelly in June 2010 invited voters to join him and shoot a fully automatic M16 rifle, urging them to 'get on target' and help 'remove' Gabrielle from office. Gabrielle herself said that she was Palin's targeted list, saying 'the way she has it depicted has the cross-hairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they have to realise there are consequences to that action.'
Gabrielle drew the ire of the right wing conservatives, called the tea party, for her support of health care law approved in the House of Representatives in March. Later her offices were vandalised and been the target of protesters. Sarah Palin listed Gabrielle's seat as one of the top 'targets' because of Gabrielle support for the health care reform.
Gabrielle was shot in the head and survives on life support. Yesterday Palin took down the offending graphic from her website and offered her condolences. A Republican representative Trent Franks urged caution to in ascribing political motives for the shooting. While Sheriff Clarence Dupnik suggested that 'vitriol' in recent political discourse might be connected to the shootings. Saying, 'this may be free speech, but it's not without consequences.'
I agree with the Sheriff's view. I can't agree with any effort to disconnect from incitement to 'target' a political opponent using a telescopic sight to make the point, or the request to join a candidate to help remove a political opponent from office by joining the candidate in shooting a fully loaded M16. Any reasonable person must have know that it was an appeal to other volatile nut cases and not the language of a Democracy. I hadn't followed this until today, mainly because any mention of Sarah Palin raises astonishment that she is taken seriously. My only interest is rather macabre in that there is something fascinating about the prospect she could take a whole country in and become President when she a light weight thinker of no substance.
At the very least I hope it is the end of her political career, her departure would hopefully stop the freefall into the word imagery and the incitement to violence her rhetoric relys upon. And at the best I hope she is charged, along with the ex-marine Kelly, for incitement to commit murder (for the death of the others - who included a Judge) because I think the link is clear, and I don't believe it has to be a traditional incitement because any reasonable person would know because of the unrest over the health care bill, inciting others to shoot somebody out of office or to look at them through cross-hairs was likely to find home in the head of another nutter willing to be called to arms and not 'retreat, but reload.'
What a sad moment in time, firstly for Gabrielle and for the American people to see the underbelly so willingly appealed to by political aspirants in a free country and against somebody with the courage to reach out to the poor and caution for moderation of language and temperance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)