Look, it's rachael dickleberryhead... trying to pretend she isn't a lawyer.

Old rach, is reventing herself. There's a new donkey in her life called dumbo, who dicklehead membery has 'associated' with behind the barn and anywhere else available, all the while discussing the next mayoral campaign and how dickhead might rort the system once again. It's so sweet.

I will be interested in the compensation bid process. Has anyone else followed one closely? It has to almost be like a mini trial but just 'on the papers'. I think that is the term. Nice without lawyers interjecting


Quotegoldnkiwi (629 ) 9:41 pm, Sun 8 Jan #72

For those that have forgotten Rachael Membery is a law graduate who sued her father and was investigated when 'standing' for the mayoral seat in Otrohanga but not in the usual 'position.'
Oh Rach, your such a funny moron - I could just give you a big bale of hay and a carrot.

The meaning of creepy according to a twisted sister.

Have you Nana? I do not believe that I am anywhere near as fanciful as you, but i appreciate how you monitor and care about all who post in this thread. Creepy, but I am sure well meaning.

Quotegoldnkiwi (611 ) 4:58 pm, Sat 2 Apr #31980

Wanting to accept only facts and the decision of a fully informed Jury is apparently 'creepy' to old dickleberryhead.

However, cheating in the Mayoral elections and still losing three times,
being married to 2 dead donkeys,
being a member of a pedo's hate-site,
being a law graduate who would probably never be accepted to the Bar,
suing your own father,
bumping a message board thread that attempts to glorify a dead pedo,
thinking that losing is actually winning,
convincing yourself that you won something when in fact you lost,
saying 'no, if, buts or maybes' when in fact it's your own currency,
and generally being a dickhead, is not 'creepy.'
Sure.

Rachael newberry, dickleberryhead - a law graduate

asks where is the evidence?

possible, maybe, similar, hearsay, allegations, no conclusive evidence, no cat or dog prints, suggestions, not confirmed,.............etc where is the proof, all just playing with words, everything having a proviso. Where is the evidence? Perhaps it was in the 'suppressed report', perhaps these grey areas could have been put to rest once and for all if its' findings had been put before the jury. Perhaps that would have been 'conclusive'.
Quote
goldnkiwi (611 ) 6:30 pm, Wed 23 Mar #31871

Well dear dickleberry you must have been asleep when you went to law school, or maybe day-dreaming about, well .... donkeys. If you'd been awake, or not playing with yourself in the back row and making lots of eehaw noises you might have heard that 'where is the evidence' is the onus placed on the Crown to prove the charge. I know that's a lot to absorb in one go, and I don't want to put pressure on your asinine, mouse-sized brain, in a donkey head, but that is what the Jury asked the Crown, and concluded to respond 'not guilty' five times over. Just imagination yourself five times over, if there is a paddock big enough, and you would realise you'd be sated with the truth, as the Jury were that the answer to the question to the Crown of 'where is the evidence' was responded to with no meaningful weight.

Retard Rachael trying to clean up the crap running down her legs.

Good girl Rachael, I'm sure you didn't lie about being a law graduate, or being a rejected local body politician who was caught offering gifts to voters. No no no, you didn't do any of that Rachael. In fact you're not even a member of hate-sites, you were just studying on behalf of learned friends whose ambition it is to make the world a better place by bullshitting and cheating. You're so funny Rachael, and desperate. You're so desperate Rachael, you old law graduate you, you old real estate agent you, you old mayor wannabe. Stop crapping in public will ya it's a health hazard. And might I close by saying to Rachael, 'The old gray mare ain't what she use to be.' Tough luck, talk to kalpal and find out much deeper you can get in the shit.

Retard Rachael, 'time is not my friend..'

I understand that it was in the Privy Councils' power to have quashed the conviction altogether and not have put the NZ Government to the expence of a new trial, does any one know why they didn't? Or is it the obvious answer? Sorry for everyone else having to research but time is not my friend at the moment

Edited by goldnkiwi at 7:47 pm, Wed 3 Nov

Quotegoldnkiwi (608 ) 7:45 pm, Wed 3 Nov #29124

No Retard Rachael, time is not your friend, either is having a brain.

PS. Don't worry about the Retard Award for this week Rachael, it's yours I'm sure, in the bag.

I was just walking along the path when I heard a bird, perched on the roof, singing.

I looked up and thought, I wonder if that's Racheal Dickberryhead or some other bird brain.

Retards are go......

Dazzling performance today. Ralphie has endorsed supergoof's learned opinion that it is the Judge's job to repeat everything counsel say in their summing up. I suppose that is in case the Jury didn't hear it the first time because they were having a party in the boy's room. We can take by this that Counsel say whatever they like and indeed refer to evidence and witnesses that do not exist. This is a great leap forward, and in the future no witnesses or evidence will be needed at a trial, both Counsel will say whatever they like, which the Judge shall repeat and maybe add a few tidbits of his own just for fun and entertainment and then it will go to the Jury.

Would that be enough to keep a retard party going for a year in full lift off? Well just in case it isn't old retard Rachael happens along main street Otorohanga riding a broomstick horse and making horsey noises at Mayor Colgate. She's on a winner this time. She's a gunslinger and it's high noon. This from her.....

it would seem that it was the children that were providing the angst to the killer, not the mother and well it would have definitely been suspect for Robin to have suicided using more than one shot

Quotegoldnkiwi (608 ) 3:15 pm, Fri 29 Oct #28746

'definitely been suspect' go Rachael whoa whoa. Been at the plonk bottle already have we? Would 15 shots to the head have raised any suspicion that it wasn't suicide? But I see what you mean, one shot proved suicide. The sisters won't like that coming from a fellow hate-siter racy rachael, the hornblower at the local hunt club. Go Rachael honk honk.

Retard Rachael, I want be a Mayor or even a mare will do.

i for one appreciate ur understanding of the issues, even now it is confusing, i vote for professional juries

Quotegoldnkiwi (608 ) 5:38 pm, Mon 25 Oct #28607

Finally admits what was obvious all along that she's confused. I'm confused too Rachael, how can the opening of a silencer be smaller than the bore of the rifle it's fitted with?

You know Rachael, when the electoral officer said that you could have been cheating, did you tell him you were confused because generally you only cheat when playing snap with the children in the local kindergarten? How long has your confusion lasted? Do you suspect that the results of your brain scan (the findings of which were that you don't have one) might provide an answer for your general bewilderment? When you lost the election for the third time, did you, in an interview with the local paper, report that you were perplexed by the outcome and state that some of the voters might have been confused by the gifts you gave them, (you know the toothpaste squeezer,) and voted for Colgate instead of you? Is by chance the new Mayor's name Colgate?

Retard Rachael from Otorohanga goes for it again.

She doesn't want to share the award ....

te-aroha wrote:

idiot..

Mr Ngamoki said the rifle was in good condition, but it did misfeed and jam once while he was conducting firing tests with it.

This required reloading of the magazine, manually retracting the bolt and shaking the bullet free, or flicking it out with an object.

He confirmed to prosecutor Cameron Mander that a bullet shown to him, from the Bain family home, had the characteristics of having been misfed and jammed.

Bain's defence team has raised the issue of a misfed bullet in the lounge where Robin's body was found, and have put it to witnesses that Robin would not have stayed still if David had misfired the rifle and been forced to reload and fire again.

Bain's lawyer, Helen Cull QC, said there were five misfeeds in the house on the morning of the killings.

how would she know that? did David tell her do u think??

Quotegoldnkiwi (608 ) 12:18 pm, Mon 25 Oct #28592

Well, retard Rachael from Otorohanga, the way Helen Cull QC would have known there were fives misfeeds because it was part of the evidence, and if you even read the post you copied you'd see the armourer was able to tell the characteristics of live rounds that had been misfed and jammed. You display again your ignorance and willingness to persecute somebody on evidence you can't understand even when it's before your eyes. You a complete retard, you're so retarded you've spent your whole life crawling backwards down a sewer with your mouth open.