Kent has been busy tidying up the JFRB site which he made private in late 2009. Of course like Counterspin and Guilty Free Forums JFRB (Justice for Robin Bain) has continued to leak. It was by reason of those leaks that information became available about the hate-siters stalking jurors and others. That's the way it was revealed that Melanie White wrote a false confession so distinct from reality that it would never have been accepted by a Court but charges nevertheless of attempting to Pervert the Course of Justice may have applied. The interesting thing about that 'confession' was that Melanie in a state of excitement kept changing the voice and perspective of the alleged 'confessor.' Real basic oversights, but thoroughly consistent with even police attempts at fabricated evidence, a false confession in the Bain case was no more ridiculous than the claim that eye lens had been photographed on the floor of Stephen's room out in the open days before it was found 'hidden' late at night under a ski boot. Or the other circumstances of the assertion that David sought to be seen on his paper round to provide an alibi - hello on that, the papers were never going to deliver themselves folks.
The most astounding leaks of all were probably those by Annette Curran's hate-site, where she utilised advertising that allowed entry by any person on the internet into the secret site. Capital D for Dumbo on that one. But what was revealed was very sick, people plotting to have children taken off those they felt were supporters of David Bain, Glenda O'Brien and others freely talking about false information they provided the SST who willingly acted upon it. All this under the guise they were 'right thinking' people. It has never occurred to them that 'right thinking' people don't plot against others using lies, don't persecute others on information that is fabricated, or spread lies and rumour in an effort to 'win.' No winning was ever going to come from what the hate-siters took it upon themselves to do, even when they saw themselves as messengers of the 'truth' engineering a deliberate campaign to keep David Bain in prison for crimes time has shown that he not only didn't do, but that he couldn't have done.
No members of any of these hate-sites were sworn to secrecy and no decent person finding themselves amongst a rabid bunch of nutters was obliged to either stay or keep 'mum' on the bad work afoot. So good on the infiltrators, the deliberate ones, and those that were just shocked and thought that they should do something about it and continue to monitor the activities of the hate-sites. It was from these activities slipped the information as to who was feeding the hate-sites information, ex police in some circumstances, media, some attached to the Otago University and the list goes on.
Now as we read of attacks on Justice Binnie's report of those that haven't even read it we see another step in the campaign. But the participants are fewer now, some have simply had enough, others have put away worrying about doors on a van or what this person or that person said, or what somebody 'reckoned' and focused simply on that final death scene, the one that tells the entire story of the deaths of Bain family members. A scene that not one person in New Zealand that gave evidence, arm chair experts, media experts using smoke and mirrors has ever been able to reconcile in a way that disproved the fact that Robin suicided. The man both with blood smears on his palms and his fresh blood on a towel in the laundry. 10,000 or more pages of evidence, photographs, discussion of trajectory, blow back from a non-exiting head wound, spatter patterns that excluded another person being in the room when Robin shot himself showed more simply than the man with the damaged and bloody hands was the killer of his family, nothing more simple than that.
So as the hate-sites continue to leak and be purged by a desperate Kent Parker there is no distance in the world between the deaths of Margaret and three of her children than the blood left on their father's hands. There is something very sad about this whole case, those that support Robin destroy the memory of his family. Why do I say that, for the reason above there is no distance between the deaths of the Bain's and the blood smears found on the father's hands, not an inch or a millimetre. Millions of dollars has been spent to prove otherwise, as futile as arguments that water runs uphill, or that the earth is flat when any cop worth is salt asked himself why, if Robin had been a victim of murder, was there blood on his palms, cuts and bruises to his hands, blood flow across his lower left cheek unconnected to the flow of blood from his wound, and then stopped and listened to what Dempster had to say, and wait for test results as to whose fresh blood it was on that towel in the laundry.
So speaking of futility we see Kent Parker trying to clean up a mess he made years ago, much of which was recorded years ago as big mouths bragged about what ex cops had told them, bragged about talking to witnesses and how about how many 'jurors' they had. Futile, insane panic from those without guts to simply say they were wrong.
Showing posts with label Kent Parker.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kent Parker.. Show all posts
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Kent finally pleads guilty..
It had to happen, Kent's situation was too obvious not to be true despite his protestations and manifold pleadings to the Court to the contrary. He always knew he was a publisher and therefore just as liable for the content of what he published on behalf of others.
Granted that he was in a state of denial, choosing to ignore the Trade Me settlement as irrelevant to his own case because he has 'bushy' on side. He probably also decided to ignore the following from the TV3 website where he and his hate-sites members had been proliferate until recently...
Moderation is necessary on a site like 3news.co.nz because we can be held legally responsible for all content published, we also want to encourage a place where people are free to expound an intelligent opinion without being persecuted or harassed.
Kenty had recently seen the fact that Karam had narrowed the case against him as some kind of victory rather than a tightening of the strait jacket in which Kent belongs. In Kent's celebrations he said because of his apparent vindication (in his own poor mind) that he would be publishing parts of'bushy's' clearly defamatory book. However, his small degree of cunning and common sense took temporarily hold and he only 'published' the book or parts of it where it could not be seen. Showing that the connection of the defamatory book to the 'dropped' charges was so obvious, even to him, that the removal of the charges was only to expedite Kent's own demise, nothing more.
So an interesting aspect of Kent's reasoning was demonstrated. He accepted that the book contained defamatory comment and dared not publish it on an open site. karam most likely would have noted that. Parker dares not publish the material again, accepting that it is only removed from the proceedings to suit the plaintiff's ends. So Parker originally published it, got sued, then Karam removed that material from the pleadings to narrow the proceedings and see if Parker's defence can survive an application for it to be struck out which Parker has written about himself. Parker celebrated a 'victory,' said the defamatory book, or parts of it, would be published. then crapped himself. Good work from Kent, showing the shock treatment didn't damage his entire brain.
Well, maybe not because shortly after Kent decides to promote his 'powers' of propaganda and makes the following announcement regarding 'use' of his site:
Of course this is tantamount to Kent's guilty plea, even if ignoring his earlier one of saying he would again publish the 'book' because of his apparent victory - then wisely having second thoughts. The 'announcement' shows that Kent understood all the way along, despite his rejected pleadings in defence, his liability as a publisher. Because his new attempt to profit from propaganda was spelt out to be 'self-published.' Even though this 'self-publishing' defence is long since abandoned by Trade Me, Sella and now TV3 Parker chose to gift a more important meaning to Karam. Parker has effectively admitted the obvious publishing ownership of the material he is being sued over. The material subject to the suit had no such proviso as 'self-published' regardless of whether that was a defence or not. Parker now says it was a defence anyway because it didn't have the proviso 'self-published' - he may take a little while to absorb that.
On another note, TV3, as shown above, is at least the 2nd site after Trade Me to spell out no harassment on line. Thus placing further into prominence and public consciousness that harassment can take place on the internet. I congratulate them, even accepting there could be elements of self preservation or protection - it remains a leading statement in the common law as to impose restrictions in speaking in cyber space, just as a good publisher should do. I see it as another step in leading the way back to the simple centuries old understanding of publication of the written word as not somehow lost because of a new frontier extending to a greater market.
In the meantime, I think Kent has firmly shot himself in the foot. He would have been foolish not to have realised his site was being watched, in fact some of the members, and perhaps himself, have boasted of that - even writing 'open' letters to Karam, and 'opinion' pieces. Speaking of opinions Kent has confirmed for all time the opinion held by many that he is simply a liar prepared to hurt others in what ever way he can to get attention or get ahead. He had no feeling for the Bain family, Robin Bain or anyone else, he simply saw an opportunity for himself and didn't care who might have been hurt in the process.
Granted that he was in a state of denial, choosing to ignore the Trade Me settlement as irrelevant to his own case because he has 'bushy' on side. He probably also decided to ignore the following from the TV3 website where he and his hate-sites members had been proliferate until recently...
Moderation is necessary on a site like 3news.co.nz because we can be held legally responsible for all content published, we also want to encourage a place where people are free to expound an intelligent opinion without being persecuted or harassed.
Kenty had recently seen the fact that Karam had narrowed the case against him as some kind of victory rather than a tightening of the strait jacket in which Kent belongs. In Kent's celebrations he said because of his apparent vindication (in his own poor mind) that he would be publishing parts of'bushy's' clearly defamatory book. However, his small degree of cunning and common sense took temporarily hold and he only 'published' the book or parts of it where it could not be seen. Showing that the connection of the defamatory book to the 'dropped' charges was so obvious, even to him, that the removal of the charges was only to expedite Kent's own demise, nothing more.
So an interesting aspect of Kent's reasoning was demonstrated. He accepted that the book contained defamatory comment and dared not publish it on an open site. karam most likely would have noted that. Parker dares not publish the material again, accepting that it is only removed from the proceedings to suit the plaintiff's ends. So Parker originally published it, got sued, then Karam removed that material from the pleadings to narrow the proceedings and see if Parker's defence can survive an application for it to be struck out which Parker has written about himself. Parker celebrated a 'victory,' said the defamatory book, or parts of it, would be published. then crapped himself. Good work from Kent, showing the shock treatment didn't damage his entire brain.
Well, maybe not because shortly after Kent decides to promote his 'powers' of propaganda and makes the following announcement regarding 'use' of his site:
Each
anti-propaganda campaign registered with counterspin gets its own subdomain and
is self-managed and self-published.
Of course this is tantamount to Kent's guilty plea, even if ignoring his earlier one of saying he would again publish the 'book' because of his apparent victory - then wisely having second thoughts. The 'announcement' shows that Kent understood all the way along, despite his rejected pleadings in defence, his liability as a publisher. Because his new attempt to profit from propaganda was spelt out to be 'self-published.' Even though this 'self-publishing' defence is long since abandoned by Trade Me, Sella and now TV3 Parker chose to gift a more important meaning to Karam. Parker has effectively admitted the obvious publishing ownership of the material he is being sued over. The material subject to the suit had no such proviso as 'self-published' regardless of whether that was a defence or not. Parker now says it was a defence anyway because it didn't have the proviso 'self-published' - he may take a little while to absorb that.
On another note, TV3, as shown above, is at least the 2nd site after Trade Me to spell out no harassment on line. Thus placing further into prominence and public consciousness that harassment can take place on the internet. I congratulate them, even accepting there could be elements of self preservation or protection - it remains a leading statement in the common law as to impose restrictions in speaking in cyber space, just as a good publisher should do. I see it as another step in leading the way back to the simple centuries old understanding of publication of the written word as not somehow lost because of a new frontier extending to a greater market.
In the meantime, I think Kent has firmly shot himself in the foot. He would have been foolish not to have realised his site was being watched, in fact some of the members, and perhaps himself, have boasted of that - even writing 'open' letters to Karam, and 'opinion' pieces. Speaking of opinions Kent has confirmed for all time the opinion held by many that he is simply a liar prepared to hurt others in what ever way he can to get attention or get ahead. He had no feeling for the Bain family, Robin Bain or anyone else, he simply saw an opportunity for himself and didn't care who might have been hurt in the process.
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Kent Parker feeling the pressure?
Kent Parker is very predictable and taken to acting and speaking rashly. Some will recall that Parker first blogged about a 'settlement conference' due in May as something of a victory. He portrayed it as the 'first time' that Joe Karam was finally showing some responsibility regarding the defamation charges brought by him against Parker and Purkiss. Indeed Parker had convinced himself that it might be 'all over Rover' and that his position, multi-positional as it has been, was vindicated. That Joe had perhaps recognised the validity of 'free speech' on an important case and so on as Kent prefers to delude himself.
A more experienced campaigner than Parker, someone with more smarts, could have realised that the case against Parker is very strong and that any negotiations toward a settlement would necessarily reflect that. A more experienced campaigner, realising that they'd been on the back foot through out, would have sought to make some advantage from the opportunity - made a range of offers, that at least could be used later to show a willingness to appease the plaintiff's position. But Parker has faced these solutions for 3 years and each time turned away from them and become more firmly mired in his own trap. None of us should forget that Parker had a cease and desist letter which he ignored, and after which he continued to defame Karam. He didn't have the good sense to change tack even when confronted by the first step of the proceedings that were potentially about to be brought against him if he didn't stop. He had a chorus of idiots chirping in the back ground about what Karam 'wouldn't dare do, because we get the chance to re-try David' and other such nonsense from another planet.
Parker could not pause, perhaps he has some psychological difficult that prevents him from comprehending reality, whatever, something causes him to walk the wrong way against arrows of direction. Something which is certainly a delusion of some sort. So he has never been able try and cut his losses, despite having had fair warning to stop. So, on what do I speculate that the preparations for the conference are not going well? An outburst from his Lordship that once again rails against Joe Karam. What clearer sign could there possibly be but an 'opinion' piece that attacks Karam in conjunction to the Legal Aid costs recently published? I imagine that Parker has been offered the chance to publish a full and frank apology, to meet costs to date and another amount for the damage inflicted upon Joe's international reputation - a fully warranted and reasonable set of conditions. Conditions likely to be viewed by any potential Jury as further evidence of the aggravation and public humiliation that Parker and Purkiss has sought to bring upon Joe Karam even after proceedings were commenced.
As the message sinks into some of Parker's former 'supporters' that David is in fact innocent, and that "Trial by Ambush" establishes that without question, he loses more support. But even to this point he does not seem capable of accepting that his various comments against Joe Karam could never be sustained as fact or informed opinion, and that is why the settlement process is so unpalatable to Parker. One could ask doesn't Parker get anything? Is he so far gone that he can't follow simple facts and processes that have obvious and predictable outcomes, the answer is no. An absolute no. That being the reason why his support case has simply evaporated apart from a few sickoes characterised by their hate and psychopathy.
A more experienced campaigner than Parker, someone with more smarts, could have realised that the case against Parker is very strong and that any negotiations toward a settlement would necessarily reflect that. A more experienced campaigner, realising that they'd been on the back foot through out, would have sought to make some advantage from the opportunity - made a range of offers, that at least could be used later to show a willingness to appease the plaintiff's position. But Parker has faced these solutions for 3 years and each time turned away from them and become more firmly mired in his own trap. None of us should forget that Parker had a cease and desist letter which he ignored, and after which he continued to defame Karam. He didn't have the good sense to change tack even when confronted by the first step of the proceedings that were potentially about to be brought against him if he didn't stop. He had a chorus of idiots chirping in the back ground about what Karam 'wouldn't dare do, because we get the chance to re-try David' and other such nonsense from another planet.
Parker could not pause, perhaps he has some psychological difficult that prevents him from comprehending reality, whatever, something causes him to walk the wrong way against arrows of direction. Something which is certainly a delusion of some sort. So he has never been able try and cut his losses, despite having had fair warning to stop. So, on what do I speculate that the preparations for the conference are not going well? An outburst from his Lordship that once again rails against Joe Karam. What clearer sign could there possibly be but an 'opinion' piece that attacks Karam in conjunction to the Legal Aid costs recently published? I imagine that Parker has been offered the chance to publish a full and frank apology, to meet costs to date and another amount for the damage inflicted upon Joe's international reputation - a fully warranted and reasonable set of conditions. Conditions likely to be viewed by any potential Jury as further evidence of the aggravation and public humiliation that Parker and Purkiss has sought to bring upon Joe Karam even after proceedings were commenced.
As the message sinks into some of Parker's former 'supporters' that David is in fact innocent, and that "Trial by Ambush" establishes that without question, he loses more support. But even to this point he does not seem capable of accepting that his various comments against Joe Karam could never be sustained as fact or informed opinion, and that is why the settlement process is so unpalatable to Parker. One could ask doesn't Parker get anything? Is he so far gone that he can't follow simple facts and processes that have obvious and predictable outcomes, the answer is no. An absolute no. That being the reason why his support case has simply evaporated apart from a few sickoes characterised by their hate and psychopathy.
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Kent Parker sings - 'Dont cry for me Argentina.'
Well not quite. But judging by his latest outburst he is tearful and feeling very, very sorry himself. How touching. I heard about his latest 'woe is me' lament and somebody sent it to me this morning. It's already on the internet - so I'll publish it here and follow with some comments for those that can't be bothered going looking or who don't want to visit a hate-site.
Defending the Deceased
I am defending the reputation of a deceased person, Robin Bain, who, in the Bain murder retrial of 2009 was not able to defend himself, and yet had various spurious and opportunistic accusations thrown against him with very little evidence to back them up. I can safely say that I speak on behalf of a number of Justice For Robin Bain (JFRB) members in this respect. It appears that dead people have few rights and that people can say whatever they like about us when we are dead. As far as I know I do not need anyone's permission to represent a dead person; not their family or anyone else; and I can assure you that I do not have any weird beliefs about communicating with people "on the other side". I do this because I want to and because in a democratic society such as ours, I am able to. The number of people who still belong to and actively participate in counterspin and the Justice for Robin Bain group, and their stature and reputations indicate that this is a cause worth pursuing.
The defamation suit that has been served on me, Vic and by proxy, 16 other members of the JFRB group, gives us a distinct venue in which to apply this political advocacy. Without it we would be void of a cause. There are two sides to every argument, and by dint of circumstance, Robin's side of the argument was sorely lacking until Bryan Bruce's incisive documentary The Case Against Robin Bain, was aired in July 2010. It is readily apparent that, despite the action we have taken in response to Karam's defamation suit, he remains keen to press his case, therefore any trial that might ensue from this insistence may provide the crucial opportunity to publicly air the evidence and exonerate Robin Bain. At the same time we may get some case law in place with respect to political discussions on the internet. Since this country is in the top three nations in the world for social liberties I am not expecting any draconian judgments in any great hurry and the process may take some time yet. As it stands we have removed from public exposure all comments cited in Karam's claim except for half or dozen or so.
Politics is full of finger pointing, name calling, allegations and accusations. There are limits, but leeway has to be allowed for healthy and lively democratic expression and involvement, whether by politicians, business people or the general public. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the fire. Don't pretend that you are mortally offended by other people's opposition to your public standing. Ultimately it will be seen for what it is and you will lose your electorate as a result. Karam's attempt to silence the JFRB group I see as an attempt to prevent his followers from seeing the other side of the story, an action which I believe is entirely undemocratic and which, unless this country suddenly plummets into an elite-centered totalitarianism after the upcoming election, does not carry much credibility. In terms of the reality of the society that we live in on 13 November 2011, it is improper and vexatious (yes, that is an opinion).
Perhaps the best thing that could have happened for Robin Bain is that Karam, the person who publicly vilified him after he was no longer able to defend himself, sued the people who countered his (Karam's) arguments and thus provided the occasion for Robin to finally be vindicated. By suing us he has ensured that opposition to his ideas will not die and he has made himself vulnerable to the Streisand Effect.
Obviously, Parker thinks he is defending a dead person. In what Court, Jurisdiction and on what authority he is doing this 'defending' is hard to establish but he hints that it may well be in his own trial on defamation charges. Unfortunately Kent remains struggling to get the picture that his defamation trial isn't about Robin Bain but rather about defamatory statements Parker made and encouraged others to make about one person in particular, Joe Karam. Simply, Kent can't understand that the Courts are not a soap box from which he can rave about his misconceptions, weep, fall down even, and claim that he was defaming because he was defending a dead man.
On that point Parker continues to be unable to absorb that you don't defend a dead person by defaming a live person. Nor do you defend a dead person by encouraging and taking part in a hate-campaign and you certainly do not defend a dead person by ignoring the results of a trial. A trial in which it was necessary for the Crown to defend the dead person in order to prove that a live person was the perpetrator and not the dead man that had an abundance of forensic proof pointing to his guilt.
Just looking at that guilt for a moment, and the defamatory allegation that Karam ignored the truth in pursuit of victory of his own will, none of the evidence against Robin Bain pointing to his guilt was able to be set aside. That wasn't the 'fault' of karam or anybody else. Forensic proof is exactly what it is, in this case bruised and bloody hands of Robin Bain, a full bladder, no underwear, no porridge on the stove, no shielding of blood spatter from his self-inflicted wound, no scientific explanation of how his dna was sucked into the rifle barell, how an upward trajectory shot was achieved into his head - none of this, despite what Kent might hopefully wish others to believe, had anything at all to do with Karam. That material was gathered from the suicide scene by the police years before Karam came into the picture. Even the allegations of incest against Robin Bain were made within days of his death. So too reports of his obvious health and behaviour issues. In short, for Parker to believe he may have an 'honest belief' defence he would have to first convince the Court of matters which had already been determined by a Jury, where he would fail on that is that there is firstly the difficulty of revisiting something already confirmed by a Jury, and secondly that even if there were possibly anything arising from the defamatory allegations against Karam they cannot be countered by already established facts.
Parker continues to misunderstand his role as a publisher, his perceptions on what truth is, and fails to comprehend that our society and law doesn't dismiss lightly law-breaking and excuses for it that imply the victim of the law breaking deserves what has befallen them. Above he says that without the defamation charges that his group 'would be void of a cause,' another demonstration that fails to recognise that any party can have a cause but the minute they begin to lie about their countrymen and women, prey on them with stalking and hate campaigns their 'cause' his already voided because it is illegal. In the same paragraph, desperate Dan Parker, cites as evidence a Television show of untested and rejected pondering that failed to absorb the breadth of evidence against Robin Bain.
Parker continues with 'he (Karam) remains keen to press his case.' Perhaps finally realising that the case will not go away however much Parker squeals and publicly expresses his sorrow for himself. As an outsider I note that he made no noises other than encouraging ones, when his 'follower's stalked and threatened other nzers and used message boards such as Trade Me to spread their hate message and lies. Of course, Trade Me, are also facing defamation charges for failing to stop Parker's crew from publishing defamatory material on TM boards. Use of the words 'followers' is interesting. Parker talks about Karam's 'followers' being blocked from the truth by Karams act of suing. This statement says more about Parker, and his delusional mind, than it does about Karam.
I don't know of Karam having any 'followers' he doesn't have a website, or an organisation such as that of Parker, for all intents and purposes he holds his own counsel. Again Parker misreads that people form an opinion of their own without being 'followers.' He mistakes that a few, not so bright individuals, flocked to Parker's website and stayed for a while, as others retired quickly - realising that Parker's site and campaign was about himself and defamation, stalking and threats were seen as 'collateral' of his campaign. Personally, I didn't form an opinion about the Bain case from reading hate-site messages and other unsubstantiated nonsense, I was always primarily interested in the forensics above. The upward trajectory shot initially, the erroneous claims that David wasn't strip searched with intimate tests being taken and therefore was not a suspect, that Robin didn't have bruised and bloody hands and so it went on, all of that was answered by the evidence - not as Parker would try to manipulate as being from Karam.
Parker says 'if you can't stand the heat, get out of the fire.' His use of the word fire rather than the traditional word 'kitchen' is more of his threatening under tone. However, the fact remains that it is obvious that Parker cannot stand the heat in his own kitchen and now blubbers for sympathy, interposing threats and sweeping self rightous statements.
Too late Kent, your kitchen might be on fire but I'm sure Joe Karam's is fully air-conditioned and cool. Try to sweat it out bro, or take my advice offered over a year ago - close up your hate-site and either do a runner or go cap in hand to the man you victimised - while your at it consider what other legal action might becoming your way.
Footnote: Must note here the single piece of evidence that proved Robin as the killer, and David as innocent : the high speed blood splatter going the 'wrong' way found on Robin's shoe, and which was therefore occluded from having come from his own wound. The evidence that put him on the scene of the other killings, as it is accepted all the killings, including Robin's suicide, were carried out by one person using the same rifle in each. Setting aside all else that might seem complicated, this one piece of evidence shows why David should never have been charged and points to another reason why Parker's campaign of hate has failed.
Defending the Deceased
I am defending the reputation of a deceased person, Robin Bain, who, in the Bain murder retrial of 2009 was not able to defend himself, and yet had various spurious and opportunistic accusations thrown against him with very little evidence to back them up. I can safely say that I speak on behalf of a number of Justice For Robin Bain (JFRB) members in this respect. It appears that dead people have few rights and that people can say whatever they like about us when we are dead. As far as I know I do not need anyone's permission to represent a dead person; not their family or anyone else; and I can assure you that I do not have any weird beliefs about communicating with people "on the other side". I do this because I want to and because in a democratic society such as ours, I am able to. The number of people who still belong to and actively participate in counterspin and the Justice for Robin Bain group, and their stature and reputations indicate that this is a cause worth pursuing.
The defamation suit that has been served on me, Vic and by proxy, 16 other members of the JFRB group, gives us a distinct venue in which to apply this political advocacy. Without it we would be void of a cause. There are two sides to every argument, and by dint of circumstance, Robin's side of the argument was sorely lacking until Bryan Bruce's incisive documentary The Case Against Robin Bain, was aired in July 2010. It is readily apparent that, despite the action we have taken in response to Karam's defamation suit, he remains keen to press his case, therefore any trial that might ensue from this insistence may provide the crucial opportunity to publicly air the evidence and exonerate Robin Bain. At the same time we may get some case law in place with respect to political discussions on the internet. Since this country is in the top three nations in the world for social liberties I am not expecting any draconian judgments in any great hurry and the process may take some time yet. As it stands we have removed from public exposure all comments cited in Karam's claim except for half or dozen or so.
Politics is full of finger pointing, name calling, allegations and accusations. There are limits, but leeway has to be allowed for healthy and lively democratic expression and involvement, whether by politicians, business people or the general public. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the fire. Don't pretend that you are mortally offended by other people's opposition to your public standing. Ultimately it will be seen for what it is and you will lose your electorate as a result. Karam's attempt to silence the JFRB group I see as an attempt to prevent his followers from seeing the other side of the story, an action which I believe is entirely undemocratic and which, unless this country suddenly plummets into an elite-centered totalitarianism after the upcoming election, does not carry much credibility. In terms of the reality of the society that we live in on 13 November 2011, it is improper and vexatious (yes, that is an opinion).
Perhaps the best thing that could have happened for Robin Bain is that Karam, the person who publicly vilified him after he was no longer able to defend himself, sued the people who countered his (Karam's) arguments and thus provided the occasion for Robin to finally be vindicated. By suing us he has ensured that opposition to his ideas will not die and he has made himself vulnerable to the Streisand Effect.
Obviously, Parker thinks he is defending a dead person. In what Court, Jurisdiction and on what authority he is doing this 'defending' is hard to establish but he hints that it may well be in his own trial on defamation charges. Unfortunately Kent remains struggling to get the picture that his defamation trial isn't about Robin Bain but rather about defamatory statements Parker made and encouraged others to make about one person in particular, Joe Karam. Simply, Kent can't understand that the Courts are not a soap box from which he can rave about his misconceptions, weep, fall down even, and claim that he was defaming because he was defending a dead man.
On that point Parker continues to be unable to absorb that you don't defend a dead person by defaming a live person. Nor do you defend a dead person by encouraging and taking part in a hate-campaign and you certainly do not defend a dead person by ignoring the results of a trial. A trial in which it was necessary for the Crown to defend the dead person in order to prove that a live person was the perpetrator and not the dead man that had an abundance of forensic proof pointing to his guilt.
Just looking at that guilt for a moment, and the defamatory allegation that Karam ignored the truth in pursuit of victory of his own will, none of the evidence against Robin Bain pointing to his guilt was able to be set aside. That wasn't the 'fault' of karam or anybody else. Forensic proof is exactly what it is, in this case bruised and bloody hands of Robin Bain, a full bladder, no underwear, no porridge on the stove, no shielding of blood spatter from his self-inflicted wound, no scientific explanation of how his dna was sucked into the rifle barell, how an upward trajectory shot was achieved into his head - none of this, despite what Kent might hopefully wish others to believe, had anything at all to do with Karam. That material was gathered from the suicide scene by the police years before Karam came into the picture. Even the allegations of incest against Robin Bain were made within days of his death. So too reports of his obvious health and behaviour issues. In short, for Parker to believe he may have an 'honest belief' defence he would have to first convince the Court of matters which had already been determined by a Jury, where he would fail on that is that there is firstly the difficulty of revisiting something already confirmed by a Jury, and secondly that even if there were possibly anything arising from the defamatory allegations against Karam they cannot be countered by already established facts.
Parker continues to misunderstand his role as a publisher, his perceptions on what truth is, and fails to comprehend that our society and law doesn't dismiss lightly law-breaking and excuses for it that imply the victim of the law breaking deserves what has befallen them. Above he says that without the defamation charges that his group 'would be void of a cause,' another demonstration that fails to recognise that any party can have a cause but the minute they begin to lie about their countrymen and women, prey on them with stalking and hate campaigns their 'cause' his already voided because it is illegal. In the same paragraph, desperate Dan Parker, cites as evidence a Television show of untested and rejected pondering that failed to absorb the breadth of evidence against Robin Bain.
Parker continues with 'he (Karam) remains keen to press his case.' Perhaps finally realising that the case will not go away however much Parker squeals and publicly expresses his sorrow for himself. As an outsider I note that he made no noises other than encouraging ones, when his 'follower's stalked and threatened other nzers and used message boards such as Trade Me to spread their hate message and lies. Of course, Trade Me, are also facing defamation charges for failing to stop Parker's crew from publishing defamatory material on TM boards. Use of the words 'followers' is interesting. Parker talks about Karam's 'followers' being blocked from the truth by Karams act of suing. This statement says more about Parker, and his delusional mind, than it does about Karam.
I don't know of Karam having any 'followers' he doesn't have a website, or an organisation such as that of Parker, for all intents and purposes he holds his own counsel. Again Parker misreads that people form an opinion of their own without being 'followers.' He mistakes that a few, not so bright individuals, flocked to Parker's website and stayed for a while, as others retired quickly - realising that Parker's site and campaign was about himself and defamation, stalking and threats were seen as 'collateral' of his campaign. Personally, I didn't form an opinion about the Bain case from reading hate-site messages and other unsubstantiated nonsense, I was always primarily interested in the forensics above. The upward trajectory shot initially, the erroneous claims that David wasn't strip searched with intimate tests being taken and therefore was not a suspect, that Robin didn't have bruised and bloody hands and so it went on, all of that was answered by the evidence - not as Parker would try to manipulate as being from Karam.
Parker says 'if you can't stand the heat, get out of the fire.' His use of the word fire rather than the traditional word 'kitchen' is more of his threatening under tone. However, the fact remains that it is obvious that Parker cannot stand the heat in his own kitchen and now blubbers for sympathy, interposing threats and sweeping self rightous statements.
Too late Kent, your kitchen might be on fire but I'm sure Joe Karam's is fully air-conditioned and cool. Try to sweat it out bro, or take my advice offered over a year ago - close up your hate-site and either do a runner or go cap in hand to the man you victimised - while your at it consider what other legal action might becoming your way.
Footnote: Must note here the single piece of evidence that proved Robin as the killer, and David as innocent : the high speed blood splatter going the 'wrong' way found on Robin's shoe, and which was therefore occluded from having come from his own wound. The evidence that put him on the scene of the other killings, as it is accepted all the killings, including Robin's suicide, were carried out by one person using the same rifle in each. Setting aside all else that might seem complicated, this one piece of evidence shows why David should never have been charged and points to another reason why Parker's campaign of hate has failed.
Monday, October 17, 2011
Is Kent Parker giving Trade Me help that it doesn't want?
Originally Kent Parker and his since departed cohorts believed that Trade Me was about to fight their defamation battle for them. They were overjoyed with the fact such was the depth of their delusions. When it finally sunk in that Trade Me's interests were it's own and TM had no ambition to shelter members of hate-sites from their liabilities, in fact the site shed them in large numbers from it's own message boards, Parker and co began a number of initiatives for help which have ultimately led to the most recent which appears to be sausage sizzles to save the damned. An event I suspect which will be about as popular as Melanie White's graveside vigil which nobody but herself attended.
But although he doesn't realise it, and may not even realise that damage he has done to himself, it is within the Court system and the pleadings of Parker and Purkiss, that the men undeniably help Joe Karam with his case both against the errant twins of spin but also TM. The kind of help TM don't need. Parker has admitted in his pleadings the obvious, that he had editorial control over what appeared on his Website. Parker admits under oath the ability to remove offensive or defamatory material from his website so it follows recognition of the responsibility for the same of TM. Parker and TM therefore cannot deny the responsibility of the defamatory or offensive material on their own websites that they had the power to remove. Remote that it may be that TM would agree with Parker's submissions to the Court, because it is not in their interest to do so, it remains that the Court has already accepted the concessions of Parker - that he owned and controlled the website (as TM own their own message board,) that he had the power to delete material (as TM also share the power to remove material, indeed posters,) that membership was restricted (the same as TM.)
Parker has for all intents and purposes admitted that which TM seek to deny, the power of control over their own boards. I've written before that although TM have sought to indemnify themselves with a set of rules it would be unprecedented if any publisher were not held responsible for what they publish, despite who may have written, or re-published any particular material. Para [46] in the recently released Judgement of Associate Judge Sargisson says 'Materially, the first defendant (Parker) appears to accept that his acts or omissions may constitute publication. He deposes at paragraph 4 of his affidavit of 3 March 2011:
With respect to the application to strike out the first action against me, while I had the technical ability to remove other people's post there was no moral or legal right...
The Judge goes on to say that the plaintiffs (Karam's) claim of publication is not clearly untenable and that it is a question for a Jury to determine whether or not Parker was the publisher of the posts of others. Therein, is also sunk Trade Me who possibly have even less arguments against being a publisher than Parker. Good work Kent, I'm sure Joe is very happy with you for cutting to the chase and admitting the obvious. The fact that Parker chose to swear no legal or moral was in fact a defence has allowed both the Court and any prospective Jury the opportunity to judge what legal or moral right was in force that allowed Karam, or any other member of the public, to have their character and reputation measured by a bunch of misinformed misfits that belonged to a hate-site where they published defamatory material which was also published on NZ's largest message board site, Trade Me. Own goal Kenty, shot of the century by a complete moron!
While Kent and Vic Purkiss calculate how many sausages must be cooked the administrators of Trade Me lurch closer toward a settlement with Joe Karam thanks to the good work of Kent. While the owners surely ask how could it be that TM administrators were so thick to not realise that the traditions and liabilities of print media are not distinguished by words on a written page compared to script appearing on a computer screen. So we live and learn, even Kent....eventually.
All of the 18 people identified by Joe Karam in his pleadings as having defamed him, who published on both on TM and the hate-sites have spread the liability, as Parker and Purkiss have inadvertently admitted in their sworn affidavits to the Auckland High Court.
But although he doesn't realise it, and may not even realise that damage he has done to himself, it is within the Court system and the pleadings of Parker and Purkiss, that the men undeniably help Joe Karam with his case both against the errant twins of spin but also TM. The kind of help TM don't need. Parker has admitted in his pleadings the obvious, that he had editorial control over what appeared on his Website. Parker admits under oath the ability to remove offensive or defamatory material from his website so it follows recognition of the responsibility for the same of TM. Parker and TM therefore cannot deny the responsibility of the defamatory or offensive material on their own websites that they had the power to remove. Remote that it may be that TM would agree with Parker's submissions to the Court, because it is not in their interest to do so, it remains that the Court has already accepted the concessions of Parker - that he owned and controlled the website (as TM own their own message board,) that he had the power to delete material (as TM also share the power to remove material, indeed posters,) that membership was restricted (the same as TM.)
Parker has for all intents and purposes admitted that which TM seek to deny, the power of control over their own boards. I've written before that although TM have sought to indemnify themselves with a set of rules it would be unprecedented if any publisher were not held responsible for what they publish, despite who may have written, or re-published any particular material. Para [46] in the recently released Judgement of Associate Judge Sargisson says 'Materially, the first defendant (Parker) appears to accept that his acts or omissions may constitute publication. He deposes at paragraph 4 of his affidavit of 3 March 2011:
With respect to the application to strike out the first action against me, while I had the technical ability to remove other people's post there was no moral or legal right...
The Judge goes on to say that the plaintiffs (Karam's) claim of publication is not clearly untenable and that it is a question for a Jury to determine whether or not Parker was the publisher of the posts of others. Therein, is also sunk Trade Me who possibly have even less arguments against being a publisher than Parker. Good work Kent, I'm sure Joe is very happy with you for cutting to the chase and admitting the obvious. The fact that Parker chose to swear no legal or moral was in fact a defence has allowed both the Court and any prospective Jury the opportunity to judge what legal or moral right was in force that allowed Karam, or any other member of the public, to have their character and reputation measured by a bunch of misinformed misfits that belonged to a hate-site where they published defamatory material which was also published on NZ's largest message board site, Trade Me. Own goal Kenty, shot of the century by a complete moron!
While Kent and Vic Purkiss calculate how many sausages must be cooked the administrators of Trade Me lurch closer toward a settlement with Joe Karam thanks to the good work of Kent. While the owners surely ask how could it be that TM administrators were so thick to not realise that the traditions and liabilities of print media are not distinguished by words on a written page compared to script appearing on a computer screen. So we live and learn, even Kent....eventually.
All of the 18 people identified by Joe Karam in his pleadings as having defamed him, who published on both on TM and the hate-sites have spread the liability, as Parker and Purkiss have inadvertently admitted in their sworn affidavits to the Auckland High Court.
Monday, October 3, 2011
Kent Parker - the rise and fall of a hate-siter.
Kent Parker is an interesting, if rare bird, on the NZ landscape, most particularly because of his abortive attempt to use cyber-space in a novel way, for New Zealand, - to begin hate-sites and hate campaigns. But probably the most fascinating aspect of his failed attempt is that it ought to have been obvious to him and his followers that they were bound for failure. There are a number of reasons for this.
1/That he didn't understand the medium (cyber-space) he used.
2/That he was impetuous and driven by something other than that which he claimed was motivating his campaign. In other words he was insincere and sought to take advantage of others, many of whom were sincere if but also misguided.
3/He didn't know his subject and paid no critical analysis of 'information' supplied to him.
4/He has no ability to think on his feet or change a position, he becomes angry if there is any suggestion that he might be wrong.
5/He became obsessed with Joe Karam in particular to the point where he showing a type of bizarre jealousy.
The above in more detail
1/Kent thought that defaming or stalking people on line had no possible consequence. He clearly misunderstood that despite the word 'space' cyber-space was contained by international borders and law, where words written in 'space' landed and any relay points along the way were in fact all culpable under the law. He has consistently failed to understand this and even in recent pleadings to the High Court displayed the incapacity to follow that he was a publisher no different from a publisher in print media, he claimed that he couldn't take material of his own sites without approval of members of his site. Not only has he demonstrated that he is responsible for what he has published he also failed to realise his culpability in providing a site where he and others conspired to commit crimes contravening the Crimes Act.
2/The fact that Kent's insincerity was lost on many of his followers for some time provided him the opportunity to capitalise on the sincere anxiety of his followers so that he was able to meld them to his cause - himself. He may or may not have realised that the less 'enlightened' of his followers saw Kent's willingness to 'go public,' have a website and so forth, as legitimising things which were morally wrong and in many cases illegal. It's hard to blame the weaker minded individuals that were attracted to Parker because he empowered them, encouraged them in the belief that they were the 'only' ones that saw the truth and that those that did not were 'outsiders' an enemy.
3/Because Kent didn't know his subject and accepted whatever suited the cause, and rejected what did not, he further disadvantaged those that were acting on a 'gut feeling,' what somebody told them, 'facts' that existed no where accept in their minds and the minds of those that had provided them. For example, it was almost 18 months before Kent's group finally understood that Bain had been 'strip searched' and (perhaps) the significance of that. Most people would need the information that he wasn't searched before claiming that and hanging their hats on such a 'fact.' Their campaign was riddled with misinformation and speculation heightened by 'information' leaked to them from various sources, in many ways they were pawns, and Kent in turn, was a pawn of others, but so arrogant he is he would be unable to even consider that. Put succinctly, Parker went to 'war' with no understanding of the war and instead saw what the spoils of war might offer him and paid no regard or reservation on doing the research before reaching an opinion, in fact he worked backwards - much like the police inquiry, decided who it was then 'found' the 'right' evidence and ignored contrary evidence.
4/Parker is unable to think on his feet. The times when he has made a change have most often resulted in him back-tracking to where he was originally placed, most often these have been attended by Kent re-inventing the wheel, re-convincing himself of something and expecting others to follow. The various flip-flops in his defence to the defamation charges show this, particularly his recent attempt to have the pleadings struck out with such things, as that mentioned above. that he 'couldn't' removed defamatory material without a 'consensus' of members - many of whom it is obvious have long since headed for the hills.
5/Kent's obsession with Karam is obvious and only requires the comment that it is far from Kent's proclamations about 'victims,' his attempts to become a musician, politician, court the media etc belie his true cause, himself.
All of which Kent now sees as his predicament of; 'The People vs Joe Karam.' More on that delusional 'title' later.
1/That he didn't understand the medium (cyber-space) he used.
2/That he was impetuous and driven by something other than that which he claimed was motivating his campaign. In other words he was insincere and sought to take advantage of others, many of whom were sincere if but also misguided.
3/He didn't know his subject and paid no critical analysis of 'information' supplied to him.
4/He has no ability to think on his feet or change a position, he becomes angry if there is any suggestion that he might be wrong.
5/He became obsessed with Joe Karam in particular to the point where he showing a type of bizarre jealousy.
The above in more detail
1/Kent thought that defaming or stalking people on line had no possible consequence. He clearly misunderstood that despite the word 'space' cyber-space was contained by international borders and law, where words written in 'space' landed and any relay points along the way were in fact all culpable under the law. He has consistently failed to understand this and even in recent pleadings to the High Court displayed the incapacity to follow that he was a publisher no different from a publisher in print media, he claimed that he couldn't take material of his own sites without approval of members of his site. Not only has he demonstrated that he is responsible for what he has published he also failed to realise his culpability in providing a site where he and others conspired to commit crimes contravening the Crimes Act.
2/The fact that Kent's insincerity was lost on many of his followers for some time provided him the opportunity to capitalise on the sincere anxiety of his followers so that he was able to meld them to his cause - himself. He may or may not have realised that the less 'enlightened' of his followers saw Kent's willingness to 'go public,' have a website and so forth, as legitimising things which were morally wrong and in many cases illegal. It's hard to blame the weaker minded individuals that were attracted to Parker because he empowered them, encouraged them in the belief that they were the 'only' ones that saw the truth and that those that did not were 'outsiders' an enemy.
3/Because Kent didn't know his subject and accepted whatever suited the cause, and rejected what did not, he further disadvantaged those that were acting on a 'gut feeling,' what somebody told them, 'facts' that existed no where accept in their minds and the minds of those that had provided them. For example, it was almost 18 months before Kent's group finally understood that Bain had been 'strip searched' and (perhaps) the significance of that. Most people would need the information that he wasn't searched before claiming that and hanging their hats on such a 'fact.' Their campaign was riddled with misinformation and speculation heightened by 'information' leaked to them from various sources, in many ways they were pawns, and Kent in turn, was a pawn of others, but so arrogant he is he would be unable to even consider that. Put succinctly, Parker went to 'war' with no understanding of the war and instead saw what the spoils of war might offer him and paid no regard or reservation on doing the research before reaching an opinion, in fact he worked backwards - much like the police inquiry, decided who it was then 'found' the 'right' evidence and ignored contrary evidence.
4/Parker is unable to think on his feet. The times when he has made a change have most often resulted in him back-tracking to where he was originally placed, most often these have been attended by Kent re-inventing the wheel, re-convincing himself of something and expecting others to follow. The various flip-flops in his defence to the defamation charges show this, particularly his recent attempt to have the pleadings struck out with such things, as that mentioned above. that he 'couldn't' removed defamatory material without a 'consensus' of members - many of whom it is obvious have long since headed for the hills.
5/Kent's obsession with Karam is obvious and only requires the comment that it is far from Kent's proclamations about 'victims,' his attempts to become a musician, politician, court the media etc belie his true cause, himself.
All of which Kent now sees as his predicament of; 'The People vs Joe Karam.' More on that delusional 'title' later.
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Kent Parker - thick as a brick.
Old Kent is flat out on his 3rd attempt at finding a defence on the defamation charges he faces. He thinks 'just quietly,' as he puts it, that having his 2nd defence rejected was a victory because it left parts of his argument 'intact'. Poor stupid Kent doesn't realise that if he has no defence no weight is given to any other of his pleadings, like a horse race where a horse is disqualified, there is no solace for the owners or punters, that although the horse was disqualified it didn't fall over in the way Kent surely will.
Even after a year Kent still can't comprehend the charges he faces are both removed from the Bain case and Joe Karam. Kent wants the Bain case retried by way of his High Court defamation charges, additionally he wants to compare what he has allegedly done with what he feels Joe Karam has done. Kent is really a 3 year old in a sandpit, pointing the finger at somebody else for tipping sand all over himself and some of his playmates. He is a certifiable nutter. He says he is no longer afraid to go to Court which is an admission that he's been crapping himself for a year and permanently wearing diapers. I still recall his declaration that he wasn't going to spend a minute in Court with Joe Karam. He was right about that, to this point Joe hasn't even needed to attend because he would have little satisfaction in watching a moron shoot himself in the foot.
But Kent attests to being a veteran now, swimming around in his own crap for a year has emboldened him and one day he hopes to get a job swimming around in the Mangere sewerage ponds. He'll fit right in. Meanwhile one of his latest hopes is that he will tell the Court that dear old daddy didn't wash his hands because he still had blood on them. Way to go Kenty, just before you get shovelled out the doors of the High Court demand to have your fingernails swabbed to show that you haven't been using toilet paper for years - that could help out with your psychiatric report as to why you shouldn't be bankrupted.
Even after a year Kent still can't comprehend the charges he faces are both removed from the Bain case and Joe Karam. Kent wants the Bain case retried by way of his High Court defamation charges, additionally he wants to compare what he has allegedly done with what he feels Joe Karam has done. Kent is really a 3 year old in a sandpit, pointing the finger at somebody else for tipping sand all over himself and some of his playmates. He is a certifiable nutter. He says he is no longer afraid to go to Court which is an admission that he's been crapping himself for a year and permanently wearing diapers. I still recall his declaration that he wasn't going to spend a minute in Court with Joe Karam. He was right about that, to this point Joe hasn't even needed to attend because he would have little satisfaction in watching a moron shoot himself in the foot.
But Kent attests to being a veteran now, swimming around in his own crap for a year has emboldened him and one day he hopes to get a job swimming around in the Mangere sewerage ponds. He'll fit right in. Meanwhile one of his latest hopes is that he will tell the Court that dear old daddy didn't wash his hands because he still had blood on them. Way to go Kenty, just before you get shovelled out the doors of the High Court demand to have your fingernails swabbed to show that you haven't been using toilet paper for years - that could help out with your psychiatric report as to why you shouldn't be bankrupted.
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Kent Parker - question from a correspondent.
Perhaps you can ask, on your blog, if Kent can explain how these 3 things, all written in the same blog on counterspin, can possibly make sense?"In this hearing two interlocutory applications were tabled, one from each side, attempting to strike out the pleadings of the other side. ""The result of the hearing is that the Plaintiff, Joe Karam succeeded in his application and the Defendants failed."And"All of the Defendants defenses remain intact"
If Kent wasn't such a moron whose single purpose was to persecute others in order to disguise his own frailties and weakness of mind he could be accused of writing great comedy.
But the joke is on you kent. Entirely on you. Throughout the nation, like this correspondent above, people realise you have arrogantly cooked your own goose and there is impatience with you now for still trying to fudge the truth and not being man enough to man up.
If you had but 1/64 part of a brain, you would take this latest decision and at least try to turn it into some small advantage for yourself, to lessen your fall by even a few feet. A full public and unconditional apology to Joe Karam. An immediate letter to Karam's lawyers and to the Court saying that you accept the ruling that you have no defence and that you will seek to settle with Mr Karam at the earliest possible time. Even if Joe didn't accept your apology or terms of settlement in full you would be at least displaying publicly that you were wrong and that you were seeking to mitigate the damage. You're on a hiding to nothing Kent, the longer you ignore the inevitable the greater the damage.
As for some of your supporters anonymous comments that I'm a 'nutjob' to this point my predictions about your being sued and having no defence, then having your defence struck out have all proven correct, the pathway ahead for you and Vic Purkiss is bankruptcy of that there is no doubt - however, while it is still within your power look to settle - that, and that alone, is your only hope now - as it always was.
Every minute now is absorbing a lot of money, Court time and public impatience that you scorned the system and sought to underwrite it with lies in order to harm others. Do the country a favour and face reality, offer to Karam to fully disclose who used you as a puppet and who silently watches you now flounder on the rocks. The country wants the truth Kent, the bloody good old truth and there are many of us that won't stop until that time.
If Kent wasn't such a moron whose single purpose was to persecute others in order to disguise his own frailties and weakness of mind he could be accused of writing great comedy.
But the joke is on you kent. Entirely on you. Throughout the nation, like this correspondent above, people realise you have arrogantly cooked your own goose and there is impatience with you now for still trying to fudge the truth and not being man enough to man up.
If you had but 1/64 part of a brain, you would take this latest decision and at least try to turn it into some small advantage for yourself, to lessen your fall by even a few feet. A full public and unconditional apology to Joe Karam. An immediate letter to Karam's lawyers and to the Court saying that you accept the ruling that you have no defence and that you will seek to settle with Mr Karam at the earliest possible time. Even if Joe didn't accept your apology or terms of settlement in full you would be at least displaying publicly that you were wrong and that you were seeking to mitigate the damage. You're on a hiding to nothing Kent, the longer you ignore the inevitable the greater the damage.
As for some of your supporters anonymous comments that I'm a 'nutjob' to this point my predictions about your being sued and having no defence, then having your defence struck out have all proven correct, the pathway ahead for you and Vic Purkiss is bankruptcy of that there is no doubt - however, while it is still within your power look to settle - that, and that alone, is your only hope now - as it always was.
Every minute now is absorbing a lot of money, Court time and public impatience that you scorned the system and sought to underwrite it with lies in order to harm others. Do the country a favour and face reality, offer to Karam to fully disclose who used you as a puppet and who silently watches you now flounder on the rocks. The country wants the truth Kent, the bloody good old truth and there are many of us that won't stop until that time.
Friday, August 5, 2011
Kent Parker - a victory?
In his own words the poor demented soul.
'The result of the hearing is that the Plaintiff, Joe Karam succeeded in his application and the Defendants failed.'
More on this later, but it was with some excitement Kenty blogged about his defeat, I guess it takes time for things to sink in with him. Why, yes it does because he thinks he has cleaned up his defamatory site but it is still riddled with defamatory comment and harassment. Depart from cyber-space Kent the world is filled enough with hate and jealously without your pathetic efforts.
Bad luck Kent, maybe you are confused and thought that the you were the Plaintiff and not the Defendant - who would know?
'The result of the hearing is that the Plaintiff, Joe Karam succeeded in his application and the Defendants failed.'
More on this later, but it was with some excitement Kenty blogged about his defeat, I guess it takes time for things to sink in with him. Why, yes it does because he thinks he has cleaned up his defamatory site but it is still riddled with defamatory comment and harassment. Depart from cyber-space Kent the world is filled enough with hate and jealously without your pathetic efforts.
Bad luck Kent, maybe you are confused and thought that the you were the Plaintiff and not the Defendant - who would know?
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Kent Parker - breathless and clueless.
Kent, who has made great purchase out of publishing sub-judice material, suddenly doesn't want to reveal whether or not his defence was struck out, citing that to do so would be 'sub judice.'
This from the guy who happily printed Melanie White's false confession and who publicised 'evidence' from someone who had 'just' returned from overseas with 'important' information on the Bain case despite the compensation review being on going. What's good for the goose is good for the gander kent, and you certainly are a bit gander. In fact probably all the material on your site about Joe Karam is sub judice because it sets out to prejudice a potential jury in your favour. Maybe you need some time in the cells to reflect.
Pull the other one Kent. Grow some gonads and stop bull-crapping, what can be sub-judice about you having had a decision go against you in the Auckland High Court, how could it effect any other proceeding? Simply, your delusions of showing how 'bad' you think Karam has acted in comparison how you have acted has been rejected as irrelevant and not a defence. There is nothing sub-judice about that at all because if your case ever goes to trial in won't be based on the bullcrap defence you dreamed up, it will be based on something that a lawyer feels that fits the criteria of a lawful defence. We all know you've had legal advice and then dispensed with it. More seasoned observers note that such a situation arises when some idiot, like yourself, can't handle being told that your a dreamer and your defence is a dream.
Effectively, that is what appears to have happened Kent. Why not be honest about it? Your not a lawyer's shoeshine, everyone knows that. It's unlikely that anybody would take your case to the Appeal Court because it lacks substance, somebody however might by some miracle find something that was overlooked. However, that is unlikely because the Court would have offered you some direction about that as they ran black lines through your meandering, irrelevant pleadings, and no doubt earlier given you advice to get a lawyer.
You've been told before Kenty, cut your losses and hope that Mr Karam might come to some arrangement with you. I doubt that he's a vindictive man and he probably feels quite sorry for you considering your obvious impairments and difficulties. But even if you haven't got the fortitude to do that, admit that your are wrong, at least stop bullcrapping. Be a man for once in your life and stop hiding the truth just because it's stuck in your craw.
This from the guy who happily printed Melanie White's false confession and who publicised 'evidence' from someone who had 'just' returned from overseas with 'important' information on the Bain case despite the compensation review being on going. What's good for the goose is good for the gander kent, and you certainly are a bit gander. In fact probably all the material on your site about Joe Karam is sub judice because it sets out to prejudice a potential jury in your favour. Maybe you need some time in the cells to reflect.
Pull the other one Kent. Grow some gonads and stop bull-crapping, what can be sub-judice about you having had a decision go against you in the Auckland High Court, how could it effect any other proceeding? Simply, your delusions of showing how 'bad' you think Karam has acted in comparison how you have acted has been rejected as irrelevant and not a defence. There is nothing sub-judice about that at all because if your case ever goes to trial in won't be based on the bullcrap defence you dreamed up, it will be based on something that a lawyer feels that fits the criteria of a lawful defence. We all know you've had legal advice and then dispensed with it. More seasoned observers note that such a situation arises when some idiot, like yourself, can't handle being told that your a dreamer and your defence is a dream.
Effectively, that is what appears to have happened Kent. Why not be honest about it? Your not a lawyer's shoeshine, everyone knows that. It's unlikely that anybody would take your case to the Appeal Court because it lacks substance, somebody however might by some miracle find something that was overlooked. However, that is unlikely because the Court would have offered you some direction about that as they ran black lines through your meandering, irrelevant pleadings, and no doubt earlier given you advice to get a lawyer.
You've been told before Kenty, cut your losses and hope that Mr Karam might come to some arrangement with you. I doubt that he's a vindictive man and he probably feels quite sorry for you considering your obvious impairments and difficulties. But even if you haven't got the fortitude to do that, admit that your are wrong, at least stop bullcrapping. Be a man for once in your life and stop hiding the truth just because it's stuck in your craw.
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
Kent Parker - feeling a bit testy?
Morning Kent,
Another rough night? That's good. You must feel disappointed being unable to release your stalkers to get revenge on your behalf. But if you think about it Kent you were told all about what was going to happen to you and now it has happened. I see that you are such an idiot you are still publishing lies for public view on your hate-site. I know this will be hard to follow, but when the award for defamation is made against you it will be an aggravating factor that you didn't stop when written to, didn't stop even after papers were served on you, but it might be worst of all that you continue even now when you've been told your multiple defences to all the charges against you have no merit - that they're about as useless as your multiple personalities.
You probably understand now Kent that there are other investigations going on looking into your activities and those of your associates. Some of them are even now in the Court system, a complete sketch of you and your hate-site buddies was framed 2 years ago and since then, by way of mistakes, arrogance, leaks and sheer stupidity you and your fellows have coloured that sketch so that it now a clear picture of the illegal activities you encouraged and undertook to undermine the justice system, the privacy of members of the public. You, of impetuous mind, no doubt saw gaps in the narrative as signs by which you could delude yourself that things weren't as bad as you sometimes imagined, but Kent they weren't gaps, they were procedural steps of a momentum gathering against you and others as you so willingly supplied more and more information.
You and your fellows made personal attacks against people and their families, people personally unknown to you. People, you felt you had some right to interfere in their lives, terrify them with phone calls and threats, lay false complaints to the police, stalk people, you sure did it all Kent even harassing a sick mother and young children when the mother was undergoing serious medical interventions. That's what you are kent along with your sicko mates and if there was ever any doubt that the individual acts were isolated you and your band of idiots have since proved otherwise and still more information comes. From the MOJ that this arose from, another picture emerges just as disturbing and affecting a lot more people. You Kent are one of the architects and by the time things are finished a complete understanding will have emerged of others behind the scenes using you and idiots like you to defend a corrupt investigation and prosecution. Should be fun Kent, and don't feel down. Look on the bright side, in a contest of idiots you'd stand out as only one of 2 men in NZ history to face hundreds of defamation charges, go onto defend yourself and be told you have no defence. That's classic idiocy and maybe you might feel proud of that in your pea-sized mind. Ring kal and golfergold and have a lol. Seeya.
Nos
Another rough night? That's good. You must feel disappointed being unable to release your stalkers to get revenge on your behalf. But if you think about it Kent you were told all about what was going to happen to you and now it has happened. I see that you are such an idiot you are still publishing lies for public view on your hate-site. I know this will be hard to follow, but when the award for defamation is made against you it will be an aggravating factor that you didn't stop when written to, didn't stop even after papers were served on you, but it might be worst of all that you continue even now when you've been told your multiple defences to all the charges against you have no merit - that they're about as useless as your multiple personalities.
You probably understand now Kent that there are other investigations going on looking into your activities and those of your associates. Some of them are even now in the Court system, a complete sketch of you and your hate-site buddies was framed 2 years ago and since then, by way of mistakes, arrogance, leaks and sheer stupidity you and your fellows have coloured that sketch so that it now a clear picture of the illegal activities you encouraged and undertook to undermine the justice system, the privacy of members of the public. You, of impetuous mind, no doubt saw gaps in the narrative as signs by which you could delude yourself that things weren't as bad as you sometimes imagined, but Kent they weren't gaps, they were procedural steps of a momentum gathering against you and others as you so willingly supplied more and more information.
You and your fellows made personal attacks against people and their families, people personally unknown to you. People, you felt you had some right to interfere in their lives, terrify them with phone calls and threats, lay false complaints to the police, stalk people, you sure did it all Kent even harassing a sick mother and young children when the mother was undergoing serious medical interventions. That's what you are kent along with your sicko mates and if there was ever any doubt that the individual acts were isolated you and your band of idiots have since proved otherwise and still more information comes. From the MOJ that this arose from, another picture emerges just as disturbing and affecting a lot more people. You Kent are one of the architects and by the time things are finished a complete understanding will have emerged of others behind the scenes using you and idiots like you to defend a corrupt investigation and prosecution. Should be fun Kent, and don't feel down. Look on the bright side, in a contest of idiots you'd stand out as only one of 2 men in NZ history to face hundreds of defamation charges, go onto defend yourself and be told you have no defence. That's classic idiocy and maybe you might feel proud of that in your pea-sized mind. Ring kal and golfergold and have a lol. Seeya.
Nos
Monday, August 1, 2011
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Kent Parker - gone a bit quiet.
Kent seems to have gone a bit quiet. Maybe he's got a secret that he doesn't want to let his followers know in case they all crap themselves.
It's such a shame. I use to enjoy all the lectures he gave people about the law, defamation in particular. A right expert is our Kent, or maybe not? I remember when he gave me a big lecture, banned me from his hate-site and kept the lecture going even though I couldn't reply. Oh dear, he had the upper hand - then.
I seem to recall blogging a few months ago that his defence would be struck out. If that happened he'd be deep in it, as would all the other blabber mouths that thought they could defame at will. Well I did suggest that he get a lawyer because Judges didn't like dealing with know it all nutters from hate-sites. Surely that couldn't have happened, not to dear old Kenty. Maybe fiddler Ralph, or one of the other arse-wipes, might let us know.
Hmmh, I wonder what it could be then? If were the that his defence is struck out because it has no merit in law, the next thing he'll either have a sex-change or announce that he now has a lawyer. Hold on, didn't have a lawyer earlier. Yes, he did. Maybe Kent didn't like being told the law being an expert himself and all.
Oh well, I'm probably just mistaken.
It's such a shame. I use to enjoy all the lectures he gave people about the law, defamation in particular. A right expert is our Kent, or maybe not? I remember when he gave me a big lecture, banned me from his hate-site and kept the lecture going even though I couldn't reply. Oh dear, he had the upper hand - then.
I seem to recall blogging a few months ago that his defence would be struck out. If that happened he'd be deep in it, as would all the other blabber mouths that thought they could defame at will. Well I did suggest that he get a lawyer because Judges didn't like dealing with know it all nutters from hate-sites. Surely that couldn't have happened, not to dear old Kenty. Maybe fiddler Ralph, or one of the other arse-wipes, might let us know.
Hmmh, I wonder what it could be then? If were the that his defence is struck out because it has no merit in law, the next thing he'll either have a sex-change or announce that he now has a lawyer. Hold on, didn't have a lawyer earlier. Yes, he did. Maybe Kent didn't like being told the law being an expert himself and all.
Oh well, I'm probably just mistaken.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)