I am happy to give you a reasonable amount of time to deal with my complaint dated the 15/1/11 though my position remains unchanged as to seeking legal remedy if required because I have a very strong case which I believe is in the Public Interest. As a matter of note I have now been able to research the 'source' of Stockdale's 'evidence' and it is bogus, absolutely untrue.
In the meantime and separately, the following is entirely offensive to Joe Karam and the defence team and more particularly to David Bain himself. That these disgusting comments should be aired on a public message board by the administrator of a hate-site currently being sued for many allegations of defamation on the same matter beggars belief. Please disabuse yourself from any thought that Stockdale is anything more than a liar intent on persecuting David Bain and others by the use of lies and in other way possible.
This 'person' has been subject to a complaint to the Police for harassment of another TM member and that this further and public harassment should have a place on TM message boards is frankly unbelievable.
I have already provided you with evidence (and the offer of more detailed evidence should you require) showing that Stockdale has deliberately posted false information on TM boards 100s of times in order to persuade public opinion against David Bain being compensated, and that in part, that also includes defaming at length Joe Karam.
In this disgusting piece below Stockdale prints that either Joe Karam is not aware of the evidence of a particular witness (which Stockdale, the idiot, thinks is conclusive but which was rejected by a Jury as material to their deliberation) or, as by implication, that Karam does not care and is therefore dishonest.
As you will note the quote is cut and pasted by Stockdale and is in fact an original quote attributable to him.
As always I have all the information cached and on hand regarding this or any earlier complaint, particularly mine of the 15/1/11.
I am looking forward to your prompt response on these matters.
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Community/MessageBoard/Messages.aspx?id=132231&p=312&topic=7
supersleuth wrote:
So what does Karam think of David's aunt's evidence,I wonder. I mean,you have to say it is quite compelling. Karam would have known not too long after he started looking into the case that David Bain had told his lawyer that he was going to attest to wearing his mother's glasses.And Mrs Clark's evidence was presented at the Court of Appeal hearings. So he would have known about David wearing his mother's glasses fairly early on. I mean,it is obvious to me that Jan Clark is telling the truth. David eyes were troubling him,and she went to get up and fetch his glasses,and he told her his were in being repaired and that he had been wearing an old pair of his mother's glasses. They weren't perfect ,he said,but they got him by. So I would like to ask Mr Karam a couple of questions? "Do you accept that David Bain was wearing his mother's glasses on the weekend of the murders?" If he anwers yes,as I feel ,realistically he must,then I would ask him "Then isn't it reasonable to suggest that they were damaged because David was in a struggle with Stephen,given the fact that the lens that was missing from those glasses was found in Stephen's room?".
!!!!
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 10:03 am, Mon 17 Jan #15562
No comments:
Post a Comment