Kent's quacking again, it might be something to do with easter and he's not sure if he's a bunny or not. One thing I've always found weird about the hate-siters is the way they keep changing things, it's sort of like a tennis game in a spirited rally with the ball going back and forth but in the case of the hate-siters, and in Kent's case in particular it's 'I won't be going to court with that man' followed by 'I'm looking forward to the Court case,' followed by 'We are applying to get the suit struck out,' followed by 'Karam wants to settle,' and now the latest variation of a similar shot that hit the net earlier 'probably the best way to lay the Bain case to rest now is for the defamation proceedings [abridged] to got to trial.'
Will Kent ever get the picture? No, he won't. He still fails to understand his 'sudden' goal of having a trial to lay the Bain case 'to rest' relies on him finally getting a defence together, a hurdle or net on which he has thus far stumbled twice already. Most people almost 2 years down the track would understand the proceedings against them and what the options and outcomes might be. But not Kent, in his latest effort he thinks it's going to 'Bain trial 3' with him the starring role of Hannibal Lector. Well, if he gets there and the doubts are high that he has sufficient defence to warrant a trial the trial is going to be about what he published, his intentions and the damage of those publications to the plaintiff Joe Karam. The High Court is not going to suddenly get excited and declare that Auckland has never had a Bain trial before - 'so let's have one now.'
Kent thinks that defamation gets complicated by international borders, and that plaintiffs chose jurisdictions most suited for the plaintiff to succeed in any given case where it might have crossed borders. Kent seems to fail to understand he's sued in New Zealand for material which was published in New Zealand, and while the Court might be asked to take on the broader picture, that Mr Karam does have an international reputation that was and continues to be blemished, for increased financial appeasement the case is however being prosecuted in the correct jurisdiction.
Kent still refers to his case as 'the people v Joe Karam' in an almost forlorn way because apparently he doesn't want to be on his lonesome with a sidekick, Vic Purkiss who is very nervous - suspecting I think that Kent's rambling and best efforts so far have only led toward disaster. I hope one day Kent will understand even the first line of the writ filed against him and that the 'people' are only those that populate his many personalities.
Kent, in normal ping pong practice trots out another line (concession of guilt) that the audience was very small, he seems to forget that his boasts of how big his audience is were recorded. But even that aside he should have perhaps noted that Chris Cairns sued successfully for a tweet that was read by less than 70 people. Also, in his memory loss, Kent forgets that he himself has linked to his sites as part of a plan to 'get Karam.' I guess Kent just hopes everything he ever did, or encouraged others to do will be forgotten about just like he expects bunny rabbits to bring easter eggs in a few days.
He completes his fantasy by hoping he gets a full trial in the 'full blaze' of the media spot light with 'reporting cranked to full volume.' He's probably right on that to some degree, if it is ever held he has defence, because he has become something of an oddity and it will be interesting when he demands to plead not guilty to the Bain killings because after all he is, in his mind, going to be the central part of Bain 3.
Nos, you're a twit. That post of Kent's is obviously an April fool joke. He is just trying to lighten the mood. He knows he's a loser, his second personality does nothing but dribble and the third Kent is still doing Elvis impersonations in front of the mirror, with a hair brush. Be like his wife and the judge, don't take him seriously.
ReplyDeleteHow nervous do you think the Cairns case has made Kent? Modi made 1 tweet, that was read by 70 people and it cost him 174 thousand NZD, and that was just the damages. How many posts do you think Kent has made, and he boasts about the numbers of members his sites have, not only that, he took out newspaper adds to direct even more people to read his nonsense.
ReplyDeleteSounds like lots of money to me.
I see he is planning to sing for his supper, I hope he enjoys being hungry.
Yes the advertising in the newspapers will likely prove to be a big feature in determining the money awarded, as will Parker's self-important belligerence in complaining that Joe Karam hadn't noted the deletions Parker made from his sites - so what does the fool do? Puts more up.
DeleteParker has to keep posting the defamation, without it he has nothing and won't get the attention he craves for. Provoking Karam is the only way to be noticed. Like a sad naughtly little boy - any attention is better than none - it's sickening, weird and it feels dirty reading his polluted thoughts.
ReplyDeleteThis page
ReplyDeletehttp://superfly.co.nz/kp.htm
contains the correction for his code problem.