Thursday, February 2, 2012

Kent Parker and Ralph Taylor - schizoid much?

Lesson number 356.2089 for hate-siters - try to be consistent, act with unity, and avoid perceptions that you are actually nuts.

Taken from Kent's own handbook, pretty basic, considered to a point - but what happens after the children read it?

First of all Kent hears that David Bain is going to speak at an International Justice Conference, after 2 weeks of depression Kent decides to act. In the first instance he invites himself to speak at the Justice Conference but that is rejected. Following another 2 weeks in the doldrums he launches a campaign using 4 or 5 of the other nutters using various names, in the 'belief' that the Conference organisers either don't know who David is or what he's 'done.' They use the argument that it isn't 'proper' while the compensation claim is being considered, and a lot of other nonsense that ignores that David was found not guilty. Result they get banned. Kent however believes that David has been removed as a key note speaker and crows loudly about it in his outhouse before finding out that David remains a key note, and important speaker. You guessed it, doldrums again.

Meanwhile Taylor, who has been fiddling with himself throughout all this and otherwise acting objectionably, launches a campaign on another message board. But in true dimwit fashion and ignoring; Lesson number 356.2089 for hate-siters, he calls for David to speak out. Even suggests a speaking tour which presumably Ralph can follow by looking through windows and fiddling. Both Ralph and Kent say they believe in the law and Justice but as we can see they don't, they're not satisfied with a trial they also want a 'speaking tour' from which no doubt they hope to find reason to continue to persecute Bain and reject our system of Justice. That's why they're hate-siters folks, pure dimwits full of hate who can't accept their own shortcomings but who must find in the world somebody at who they can throw stones, jeer and mock.

1 comment:

  1. Schizoid or just crazy? Kent is spinning out on Counterspin. He's angry. And why? because he is having to take the consequences of his own actions. He isn't even slowed by the fact that those better-informed than he understand defamation better and are trying to give him a gentle lesson.

    So Kent: try this. Freedom of speech does NOT include defamation. You could have said Karam was wrong without saying he was corrupt. You could have said he was misguided without saying he was in it for the money. You could have said that the legal aid payments seem excessive without saying Karam was milking the system. You could have said that you disagreed with the verdict without saying the jurors were corrupt.
    You could have stuck to detail and not made it personal.

    But Kent, most of all, you should have checked your facts before mouthing off.

    You don't have the insight you think you do.

    ReplyDelete