I don't want to be insensitive to your difficulties. Many that there might be, with both your self-admiration problems or your non-registering IQ. In fact I urge you to remain positive on those issues because you never know, one day you could get some brain activity and learn to hate yourself.
But that isn't my only reason for writing to cheer you at this time. I'd also like to remind you, that your old mate Joe's book is released to sale next week. You've been stoic in hiding your real enthusiasm by saying that the book was never going to be written, so I know that you'll be relieved to finally get a copy.
We've had our differences kenty old pal, but I've always hated your guts in the nicest way possible. To show that, for indeed Kent, we must spit on our enemies at some time, or even just give them the fingers, I've decided to send you a copy because I know down you're on your luck.
So nice to see you again, tut, tut all that old bean.
Your old pal
Nos.
That is really mean. Telling him this soon. How will poor old Kenty be able to contain his excitement for that long?
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately for Kent, it will be a best seller so he won't be able to sell it for much, to help his flagging finances, after he has read it. Unless, of course, you can get it signed by both Joe and David with love.
Actually the book is released on the 15th. I was hoping that by thinking it was due next week Kent might stop wondering in the opposite direction to the other patients - to give them a break, but I've been told reliably that it didn't work.
ReplyDeleteHe'll be able to put it on the shelf with the other two Karam books he bought months after decided that Robin Bain wasn't guilty. Wonder what information he used to make that decision if he hadn't read any books on the subject? Do you think Joe would autograph the book for Kent. I'm sure Kenty would love that.
ReplyDeleteThe sincerity of Kent Parker is empitomised by his denial of forensic evidence against Robin, he never trys to deal with it, never accepts it but instead points out what somebody said 5 years ago, speaks about what 'most' people believe and a mixture of mumbo jumbo that best reveals the horror of his own twisted mind.
ReplyDeleteThe most interesting section will be on the final defence witness whom has, on investigation, proven to to be untruthful, a polite way of saying he lied under oath. a close second will be QC Mr Reed's explanation of his lack of investigation and apparent misleading of the court.
ReplyDeleteSomeone's evidence being untruthful does not mean they have lied. The circumstances of the evidence set out by Daryl Young were found to be 'untruthful' by a police officer, which might simply be that a discription, might have not been entirely accurate by reason of the passage of time or some mistake. I understand that Daryl Young has taken offence at the discriptions given rise by the 'untruthful' evidence tag, we may yet see some Court action on that. Ultimately, he hasn't been charged with perjury (wilfully lying) or was his evidence any way significant to disprove that Robin Bain was not the killer of his family.
DeleteOn the issue of the venerable Mr Reed, he clearly constructed the evidence into a pattern in his formidable mind that convinced him that David was innocent and Robin guilty, all the evidence against Robin was there from the outset. He relied on facts and not worn out cliches.
In closing, all the crys on behalf of Robin Bain, without exclusion, rely on disproven nonsense. Without exception none of the cries on his behalf deal with the absolute evidence against him - we simply get 'there is no forensic evidence' against him when in fact there are barrow loads.
Kent's real weakness is that he has something personal against Joe Karam and isn't able to separate the facts from his own personalising of the whole case. Reading his pages you would think that it was Karam on trial!
ReplyDeleteKent thinks he knows what there is to know but remains pig-ignorant about so much. He repeats the PCA report as some sort of justification for what he has said, but doesn't seem able to understand how much of the PCA report was contradicted by evidence in the retrial by the Crown's own witnesses. He makes claims about Karam being manipulative when he really has no idea about events and all it is is his own paranoid, conspiracy-theorist type thinking Targeting Karam. If he really thinks that Joe Karam could manipulate conference timing, a book publication date and the compensation hearing to his ends, he is totally deluded!
But what a shame he didn't withdraw as he said he was going to - instead he smears more and more egg on his face.
If he really has got an expert lawyer advising him, that expert lawyer must be similarly misinformed... or be acting through pity.
Yes, he lets his personal feelings toward Karam over-ride everything in a very obvious way.
DeleteThe PCA report is a good example of Kent being determined to stay away from the forensic proof that damned Robin, the blood spatter going the wrong way on his shoes, his blood inside the barrel and the most obvious - from the very outset, the killer's bruised, battered and bloody hands.