Here goes spinner black, giggling uncontrollably....
frank_m wrote:
No, simplistic nonsense.
Absolutely agree. One person alive and his fingerprints are on the gun in fresh blood. One person dead and his fingerprints are not on the gun.
Simplistic nonsense to think the dead man killed himself and wiped his fingerprints off the gun after death. Or that the dead man wouldn't leave prints on a blood stained rifle though everybody else did!
Quotejmhb51 (1 ) 4:15 pm, Thu 14 Apr #32070
Dear spinner,
can't you keep up the party line? Didn't you read that fatty osook and the other twisted sisters claim the rifle was wiped of fingerprints. You're right about 'nonsense to think the dead man killed himself and wiped his fingerprints off the gun after death.' But nobody but you and the other hangbainers have been saying that. Frank m wasn't saying it and obook was trumpeting loudly that the gun had been wiped, wiped blackie old girl, very old girl. And then you come out with this riveting pearly 'the dead man wouldn't leave pronts on a blood stained rifle though everybody else did.'
Simply stunning blackie old pal, a fine description of what arsewipes you are and how you each are so far up yourselves you don't understand or bother to read what your twisted girlfriend sisters like Ralph and Tony claim. Perhaps, if you ever get released from care you'll be able to explain how the prints remained on the rifle, that would be interesting. You make me wonder if there is even just one hate-siter that isn't a retarded moron. You could be in line for a moron award drrh brain.
No comments:
Post a Comment