Of course Counterspin, JFRB and Guiltyfreeforums continue to exclude themselves from public scrutiny, the irony that theirs was a 'public campaign' for right thinking nzers and from which the public are now locked out would be lost on few observers.
There are some reports that what goes on behind those closed doors has become even more bizarre and is populated now by only a handful of nutters. There are no longer calls to arms, hordes invading the boards willing to promote what they now must realise was simple propaganda and a hate message. The fact that David was treated as a suspect from the outset, had a invasive strip search and tests and was not observed to have had any scratches on his chest has cooked the goose for a good number of previous doubters. Add to that the father's blood inside the rifle despite two crown pathologists claiming it was a shot from some distance, and there is overwhelming proof that Robin Bain killed his family and then himself.
Kent Parker is no man's land, his credibility gone, his dreams of political office now realised as idiotic as his endeavours in music, psychology, and computer finesse. Largely it is only the idiots such as Stockdale continue posting page after page of lonely bs on TM while TM watch and hope that it offers them some credibility in their position that they are not a publisher.
Stockdale, transparent fool that he is, seems to believe that he enhances his argument that he is not a hate-site administrator, nor a liar or persecutor or stalker by continuing posting crap. He seems to believe his crap will save him and not in fact expose him as harassing others by perpetual defamation and lies.
Else where on the net the drums beat that this blog (which of course most will know, post dated the TM stalking, outing and harassing) justifies the execution of cyber crime by a number of named hate-siters and some yet to be named. Showing once again the sheer idiocy of these morons who could think crime against a another person can be excused by what that person did before or after the act.
So interesting times arrive, a chance for some families affected by the hate-siters stalking to test in Court the protection of law against such things, and against ongoing defamatory harassment, breaches of privacy, the question of what constitutes publishing and why their should be any distinction between a cyber publisher and the print media when clearly the cyber publishers in many instances disregard that they have any responsibility or even energy to operate within general publishing standards and societal norms.
No comments:
Post a Comment