'information' from another hate-siter Lindsay Gurnard, and his reliable 'I understand' companion fiddly Ralph Taylor.
I've posted this before....from Trial 2,
Doyle's evidence cross examination p150. Context is why they didn't do the GSR tests on David - Doyle's answer was that it would have been insensitive.
Q. He was subjected to very invasive tests of his body wasn’t he? Swabs taken?
A. He was examined by a doctor.
Q. When was that done?
A. Later that day.
Q. On that same day?
A. I think around about midday, half past 12.
Q. And we’re not talking about plastic covers around your hands or being checked, we’re talking about swabs being taken from the most intimate part of your body. And you’re saying that you didn’t mind doing that but you couldn’t bring yourself to ask for a test on his hands? Come on Mr Doyle.
A. These – these tests were carried out by Dr Pryde, there was a police surgeon and he carried them out in the normal way that he would do with any test I’m sure.
Q. And that is a particularly invasive test isn’t it?
A. Oh I’m sure it is.
Q. You have to follow a police directive as to what has to be done by the doctor?
A. The tests are required by the doctor, he has a procedure which is an agreed procedure, he follows that procedure.
Q. It’s an agreed police procedure for a police doctor to follow in a homicide, isn’t it?
A. That is correct.
Q. It involves strip-searching, swabs of intimate body parts, doesn’t it?
A. There are a number of tests, yes, all of those included.
Q. All of those are done?
A. Yes.
Now that would be clear enough for most idiots, even an idiot like Stockdale but he continues with his lies - basically accusing the Defence of not leading evidence that they Crown were silent on denying....
Remember the obvious as I pointed out in an earlier post as well as above...The easy answer is that both Det Dunne and Van Turnhout were present in the room when Dr Pryde did his examination. If (a) there was no strip search they would have said so at second trial or (b) if there was and they had seen the scratches then they would have said so. They would have shouted it from the roof tops.
So that Stockdale is lying is covered twice, once by actual evidence and secondly by the absence of evidence in denial, on a point it is to be remembered would have been dramatically helpful to a weak Crown case.
But still the lying dogs Stockdale and Taylor persist, so we'll go to the complete proof that they are rotten liars. The deposition of Dr Pryde from the first trial, quote follows verbatim...
"I obtained swabs from him from his urethral, the glands penis and the penile shaft".
So the Doctor didn't lie, didn't 'forget' because he 'asked' a question of David. He followed the procedure signed the necessary documents and handed the sealed test articles to the Detective in attendance.
So this is what we expect from the dirty dog Stockdale, he who claims to want Justice for Robin Bain, who he says cannot defend himself in death, and how does Stockdale achieve this? By casting aspersion on another dead man. A man who no doubt still has family and must abide silently while their father, husband, uncle whatever is daily maligned by the piece of crap who in 'defending' the dead Robin Bain maligns and persecutes his only surviving child with pages after pages of lies. You're a dog Stockdale, a miserable piece of crap mongrel.
Read it again dogface....
"I obtained swabs from him from his urethral, the glands penis and the penile shaft".
You should know what a penile shaft is, you've got one stuck on your shoulders that's why your piece of turd mate persecutor bro Taylor meets you in the bike shed.
The man is an arse, along with the others who do the same thing. They state assumptions and suppositions as facts, and think that if they don't know of something, it doesn't exist. And based only on such supreme arrogance, they do their best to ruin people's lives. Sadly, it seems to work: lives are being damaged, if not ruined.
ReplyDeleteStockdale is now ducking and diving, saying he was mistaken rather than lying. But the trouble is, he stated things as facts which are not facts. He did know they were not facts, whatever he might be saying now. So he lied. And for what? A bit of amusement?
Those people are a truly nasty, foul-minded and foul-mouthed bunch. I hope to see them exposed in all their vileness.