The honesty of Kennard captured in his own imagination...

I haven't worried about much in these threads. but in the Watson threads I always quoted the official document information came from.
I have been amused to see the quoting of 'official facts' most often with out citing a source so nothing can be verified. Is it obvious some have extensive access to source documents but the validity of those documents is far from clear while they are not identified. I have my own reasons for believing the original verdict was correct and nothing since has altered that. The Court of Appeal and Privy Council agreed with that verdict as did the second Appeal Court. Unfortunately the third Court of Appeal made findings of fact it was not entitled to and we have ended up with the fiasco that now prevails. We have only second and third and forth hand hearsay evidence of Laniet alleging incest. There is simply no credible corroboration of the allegations. so they are quite simply that allegations not facts. Laniet unfortunately was the source of the lack of corroberation in her allegations in her propensity to exaggerate her life in PNG.
The last factor I struggle with very hard are the so called witnesses who have come forward in reply to advertisements etc. over the years. The psychology and research into memory and memory retrieval, would caste considerable doubt on the veracity on the accuracy of the memories of many witnesses. To be clear I am not saying these people are making up memory deliberately, rather that time, retrieval and positive reinforcement of errors. It leads to false memory, but it is honestly held false memory and it is far more common that some believe.

I very rarely state something as a fact unless I can reference it to a source.
by linz4me on 01:03 pm, 04 Jul 2010

I have to ask, do you actually know what a fact is? Something is not a fact simply because you say it is. you expect others to take all you say is fact, when in reality it is only your interpretation of given circumstances.
by linz4me on 12:56 pm, 04 Jul 2010

by linz4me on 06:54 pm, 05 Jul 2010



Here is Kennard almost pious about his need to be accurate and post only the truth, yet in recent memory he has extensively claimed David Bain was not strip searched and had no intimate samples taken - more on that later. But an interesting discipline Kennard uses to strengthen what he always knew were lies and which he invariably knew would hurt David Bain. The truth was never going to hurt David, it was liars like Stockdale, Taylor, Fox and Kennard that would do that.