The following from jmhb1 (Jay)
If it was just an open and shut case why has David Bain not applied for compensation yet?
Imagine how much interest he is losing because he hasn't claimed and invested his millions.
Or does he know he has no case?
Quotejmhb51 (1 ) 9:35 am, Sat 4 Dec #30915
'That's right,' thinks Trevor William Fox a Chch trader and pedo-supporter, why hasn't David applied for compensation....and provides 'reasons' for why he wouldn't...
Why would David Bain apply for 'compensation' when he names himself as one of only two suspects in the Bain family massacre (1), and then claims he does not know who did it (2)?
(1) "David Bain said he could be the killer"
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&obj
ectid=10569482
(2) "Bain said that he, Crewe and Arthur Thomas had to “live a life where there is no conclusion to it all and there is no idea of what has happened”." http://www.listener.co.nz/issue/3678/columnists/16436/a_ques
tion_of_timing.html
Quotelucky_trader (1262 ) 12:38 pm, Sat 4 Dec #30924
I wonder what planet these morons are on.
On the 26/3/2010 the venerable and highly experienced man of the Cloth, Michael Reed QC, was reported in the NZ Herald as having told the Herald the previous evening that David's legal team was 'inviting dialogue with the Minister. In the same article the Justice Minister was reported as having had received notification of a claim for 'wrongful conviction and imprisonment.' The next month of the 21/4/10 the Minister was reported to say 'I have instructed officials to work with Mr Bain's lawyers to devise a workable process for the assessment of Mr Bain's claim.'
But really the kiddie fiddlers should be ignored totally, they have no idea of what they are talking about but feel they have a voice as right thinking dimwits. Trevor William Fox is sated from perving and snooping, downloading illegal sexual material from the internet, drooling over thoughts of children in the way Mike Stockdale has described they might be 'instructed.'
However, and without realising why the idiots are mistakenly correct because it unlikely that David will ever apply for compensation in the 'unique' way allowed by Government 'rules.' I suspect that the venerable QC is too committed to the rule of law and its rich history to bow to Government rules that attempt to supersede centuries old law and due process. That could be the reason for the Minister's words 'I have instructed officials to work with Mr Bain's lawyers to devise a workable process for the assessment of Mr Bain's claim.' Simon Power to this point has shown himself to be a 'nervous' Minister of Justice ready to shed long established practice and tenets of law by virtue of a single case or because of misinformed public opinion, only this week he made contradictory statements regarding executive power and the independence of the Judiciary when 'declining' the daughter of Jeanette and Harvey Crewe request for an independent inquiry into the deaths of her parents. The Law Commission many years ago steered a passage for compulsory compensation but the naughty Minister of about the time 'Sir' Doug Graham instead placed an onus of proof to a civil standard in law that an applicant (or victim of injustice) needed to show/prove their innocence. Of course David has already done that by being acquitted by his peers which followed a ruling by our highest Court that he was, and had been, the subject of an actual Miscarriage of Justice - the point of which I'm sure Mr Reed's letter 'inviting dialogue' was sure to have addressed.
How complex it might be all made, how much more money it will cost when really a comprehensive understanding of Robin's suicide shown by his blood vacuumed deep in the rifle barrel finally completes 16 years of labouring and trying to harness an injustice on a innocent man. He has walked free, now the issues for, and by which, he was falsely imprisoned will be redressed financially and the country it is hoped, or leaders among the country, will clinically reduce each part of the actual MOJ and lay foundations that it doesn't happen again, or if in the event it may, that system does not prevail in covering up, or even holding a view that anything less than honesty finds its way to measurement on the scales of justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment