What follows proves the ongoing lie about the scratches on David Bain's chest, that they were allegedly 'found' on him on the morning of the murders/suicide. Stockdale trys to claim that David wasn't strip searched and therefore the scratches weren't found. Stockdale makes a victim of the dead Dr Pryde, provides an opinion that the man was incompetent. The simple fact shown below is David was strip searched and no scratches were found. These same scratches were seen in a 'private collection' by Denise Cameron another blatant liar. The common denominator of these rotten persecutors is that they are all liars. They lie to persecute and mislead, they try to victimise the entire country with their hate campaign. They pretend they know more about the case than the investigators or Jury knew, but they are unmasked - again...You want some more Stockdale, you lying piece of crap?
Doyle's evidence cross examination p150. Context is why they didn't do the GSR tests on David - Doyle's answer was that it would have been insensitive.
Q. He was subjected to very invasive tests of his body wasn’t he? Swabs taken?
A. He was examined by a doctor.
Q. When was that done?
A. Later that day.
Q. On that same day?
A. I think around about midday, half past 12.
Q. And we’re not talking about plastic covers around your hands or being checked, we’re talking about swabs being taken from the most intimate part of your body. And you’re saying that you didn’t mind doing that but you couldn’t bring yourself to ask for a test on his hands? Come on Mr Doyle.
A. These – these tests were carried out by Dr Pryde, there was a police surgeon and he carried them out in the normal way that he would do with any test I’m sure.
Q. And that is a particularly invasive test isn’t it?
A. Oh I’m sure it is.
Q. You have to follow a police directive as to what has to be done by the doctor?
A. The tests are required by the doctor, he has a procedure which is an agreed procedure, he follows that procedure.
Q. It’s an agreed police procedure for a police doctor to follow in a homicide, isn’t it?
A. That is correct.
Q. It involves strip-searching, swabs of intimate body parts, doesn’t it?
A. There are a number of tests, yes, all of those included.
Q. All of those are done?
A. Yes.
PS I just copied this comment from below, to further enlarge on the picture of how Stockdale and Parker want to mislead the public. Thanks for this by the way anonymous..
Anonymous said...
If Stockdale actually bothered to check with medical professionals contracted to the police, he would find a standard set of forms and a full body diagram that is give for them to complete with each person they are required to checked.
The diagram is used to note the postion of any marks (and their size) on the body, including bruises, scratches, tatoos, birthmarks. The check list also includes the full body.
Dr Pryde noted David Bains tatoo on his upper arm, a other small scars from childhood on his torso. David had to remove his shirt for these to be seen. Why is it, then that Dr Pryde didn't also note can scratches at the same time the shirt was off? The answer is simple, because they weren't there.
November 4, 2010 12:12 PM
Mike Stockdale wrote, on the JFRB site:
ReplyDelete"I guess we all know that David Bain must have got those scratches when he was fighting with Stephen,but some of us probably wonder why Dr Pryde did not see them when he examined Bain at 11.20am on the morning of the murders. I believe there is a clue in the retrial tran...script.Constable van Turnhout ,who was in the roon for most of the time when Dr Pryde carried out his examination,said that Dr Pryde,after noting the bruise on Bain's head,and that nick on his knee,asked Bain if he had any other bruises. Now I reckon if Dr Pryde had actually strip searched Bain,as the defence have suggested,then he wouldn't have needed to ask that question. So all that talk of Bain being strip searched is just a myth perpetrated by myth perpetrators,in my opinion. And those same myth perpetrators say that Bain had an intimate swab taken,and some have implied it was from his genital area.I have it on good authority that the only "intimate"swab taken was the one Dr Pryde took from Bain's mouth. There is a photo showing Bain with his trousers down,but I have been told that if one could see the whole photo it would show that Bain was wearing shorts. I have also been told from a very good scource that there is no way that Dr Pryde would have strip searched David Bain,given the circumstances.Here was a person who had the traumatic experience of coming home only a few hours earlier and supposedly finding his family dead.No doctor would have strip searched that person,unless he was being treated as the main suspect,which at that time he wasn't. In that debate he had with Laws,Karam said "those scratches,if they were scratches,were not there on the morning of the murders".He does not know that.and ,while they might not have been definitely described as scratches,David Bain's girlfriend at the time produced a drawing of them,and a prison officer also saw them,although they were more just marks by the time he saw them."
I have some information for Mr Stockdale: if you are telling the truth about what the people you have so intrusively spoken to have told you, then they are lying to you. You are then spreading the lies because of your inability to think. You are being used.
You are a patsy. At best.