You know,David Bain got a lucky break on the morning of the murders.Dr Pryde only asked him if he had any other bruises,he didn't take a look for himself.Had he done so he would have seen those scratches.
OK,that omission did not affect the outcome of the first trial,but you have to wonder if there would have even been a retrial.I mean how on earth would the defence team been able to explain away those scratches?There is no way Bain could have got them from falling backwards.
Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 9:11 am, Thu 4 Nov #29161
Stockdale has been on about this for ages, probably posted several hundred times on the subject. It's a catchphrase for the deluded hate-siters to rub themselves while talking about it, but is it true? Is old kumara head actually a reliable narrator after all, and just being shifty - or is he a compulsive liar, a deranged eccentric, who bores the world with his talk about going for walks when the world is only interested about when he'll finally work out he's so hated that should throw himself under a bus. A bus with bloody big wheels that will be able to screen the cavern of his enormous yacking mouth.
Above, the despicable prick, blames the dead Dr Pryde but it's not the truth. I think it's clear that he's a deliberate liar, intent on covering up pedo-activities with absolutely no care as to whom his lies might harm.
If Stockdale actually bothered to check with medical professionals contracted to the police, he would find a standard set of forms and a full body diagram that is give for them to complete with each person they are required to checked.
ReplyDeleteThe diagram is used to note the postion of any marks (and their size) on the body, including bruises, scratches, tatoos, birthmarks. The check list also includes the full body.
Dr Pryde noted David Bains tatoo on his upper arm, a other small scars from childhood on his torso. David had to remove his shirt for these to be seen. Why is it, then that Dr Pryde didn't also note can scratches at the same time the shirt was off? The answer is simple, because they weren't there.