First trial testimony from David[ Were the glasses in your room, the frame and the lens, in your room on Sunday night? [David]No.
Can you account for their presence as found in your room by the Police on the Monday morning? [David] No I cannot account for that.]
Quotesophier8 (1 ) 8:37 am, Wed 17 Nov #30127
Dopey sophy above, sees something no once else can in two consistent statements by David, one - that the frame and lens weren't in his room on the Sunday night, and the consistent - that he could not account to the police for them being 'found' there the next morning. Brilliant dopey, I'm sure it makes some sense to you. Do yourself a favour and go on about Mrs Clarke, the holder the of the family fortune, or Michael Guest, the disbarred lawyer - that might make you feel better.
THEY WERE DB'S GLASSES! WORN BY DAVID! AND OF NO USE WHATSOEVER TO RB.
Quoteurbanhymns (130 ) 11:10 pm, Tue 16 Nov #30113
Urvinherman pops in to help. Except urvinherman doesn't know whose glasses they are.
Stop trying to defame urbanhymns by suggesting he is a liar if he takes you to court for defamation I will back him 100% he is not lieing he speaks with truth on this matter.
Quotesophier8 (1 ) 8:26 am, Wed 17 Nov #30125
Dopey sophy back to help the lying urvinherman. Threatening legal action.
correct me if I'm wrong here, Mr Sanderson was an optometrist, not an expert on injury and its causes or its effects.
Has he had and research peer reviewed and published on the effects to having glasses broken while being worn. If so he opinion might be of some relevance otherwise it is of as much as value as Donald Ducks on the importance of clear speech.
Quotelinz4me (278 ) 10:08 am, Wed 17 Nov #30140
Sensing difficulties, linzbinzo, takes another guzzle and two red ones and brings up Donald Duck.
ts amusing to me because you insist on believing that Robin committed incest when Iit is obvious that Laniet told bs stories, and with her own free will lived with Robin along with her freind Kyle, who said Laniet and Robin had a normal father daughter relationship. You chose to believe in this discredied story in yet ignore the fact that David told his lawyer and Aunty that he was wearing his mothers glasses etc. Just plain stupid Ash.
Quotesophier8 (1 ) 10:40 am, Wed 17 Nov #30145
Forgetting what she's already said, dopey sophy now says that they were Margaret's glasses and confirms that irvinherman is a liar afterall.
Just to change the subject: for a more concise example that the hangbainers are such bsers, they don't know if they're bsing themselves or if it's one of their mates.
They were worn by DB, he was reliant on them. They were found in disrepair with a missing lens found in Stephen’s room. This is the same lens, that his beady little eye would have stared through, looking down the scope at Stephen. Stephen gripped the barrel, only to be shot in the hand, in fending of the gun the scope would have propelled back into David, no doubt dislodging the lens.
Edited by urbanhymns at 11:28 pm, Tue 16 Nov
Quoteurbanhymns (130 ) 11:26 pm, Tue 16 Nov #30118
old erby has got a gunman looking through a scope in small room where they are of no use. It's called dramatic licence by bsing pedo-supporter.
And if you are shooting someone at point blank range you don't sight looking down a scope, ask David.
Quotesophier8 (1 ) 10:46 am, Wed 17 Nov #30148
Just to prove old erby really is a liar dopey sophy confirms it again.
And these idiots fiddlers expect to be taken seriously, because they said so. Oh sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment