palmer29 (9 ) 12 Apr 2011 lucky_trader was the seller
Sold for $69.99
(#365723668)
trade was quick,but item did not work very well.
trader responded: 12 Apr 2011
The product is very simple to use and is known to work well. If you cannot use it properly, please ask someone to assist you. Sometimes people are unrealistic in their expectations, expecting a magic wand to fix years of neglect. Reasonable people are happy with results.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old Trev is still at it, blaming the failure of a new product on 'years of neglect' without realising the poor victim only brought the product this month. Maybe dirty, untrustworthy_trader Trev, needs some of the psychiatric help that kenty's hogging.
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Kent Parkers, Counterspin - out of the closet!!!
Way to go Kenty. Love the new advertising for your nutter bros....
Dr G Frerichs, Auckland Counselling 4 depression,anxiety stress,relationship problems & more gudrunfrerichs.com
Ask a Psychiatrist Online 5 Psychiatrists Are Online. Current Wait Time: 7 Minutes. Child-Sexual-Abuse.JustAnswer.com
China Women For Dating 10000+Carefully Selected Chinese Women Seek Love.Join to Choose one! www.Chnlove
Like attracts like. At the top of Counterspin (the dead duck, locked up sickos site) are the foregoing advertisements. Counselling for depression, anxiety stress, relationship problems and more. You can also talk to a psychiatrist on line, wait time, 7 minutes, because Kent is getting some more free advice on why he's such a moron. After that if you've got a big enough house you can hitch up with 10,000 carefully selected women 'seek love' instead of, as in Kenty's case, doing it by yourself while you talk to the psychiatrist for 50th time today on the phone. Way to go Kenty.
Dr G Frerichs, Auckland Counselling 4 depression,anxiety stress,relationship problems & more gudrunfrerichs.com
Ask a Psychiatrist Online 5 Psychiatrists Are Online. Current Wait Time: 7 Minutes. Child-Sexual-Abuse.JustAnswer.com
China Women For Dating 10000+Carefully Selected Chinese Women Seek Love.Join to Choose one! www.Chnlove
Like attracts like. At the top of Counterspin (the dead duck, locked up sickos site) are the foregoing advertisements. Counselling for depression, anxiety stress, relationship problems and more. You can also talk to a psychiatrist on line, wait time, 7 minutes, because Kent is getting some more free advice on why he's such a moron. After that if you've got a big enough house you can hitch up with 10,000 carefully selected women 'seek love' instead of, as in Kenty's case, doing it by yourself while you talk to the psychiatrist for 50th time today on the phone. Way to go Kenty.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Don Brash - fascinating watch.
The peripherals.
Rodney Hide already sent to Conventry, his leadership under attack.
Then...
John Key implying a deal had been done with ACT in Epsom in the last week or so. Soon after Don Brash announcing a leadership bid for a party (ACT) of which he is yet to become a member, citing as an ally John Banks. Banks only saying that Epsom was over Hide. Don Brash talking in the tone of offers that can't be refused and going onto indicate he would form his own party if necessary but could see that ACT was already a runner and simply needed to get rid of rotten Rodney. Rodney and Boscowan indignant, talking about the democracy of their party as if in the rush of their propriety that had forgotten that they'd both been democratic with the truth over Mr Passport Peddler to the point that they kept quiet about it.
Meanwhile John, having a cup of tea with the Queen or somebody in London used his phone shoe to tell an eager NZ press, surprise, surprise, that he wouldn't rule out working with dear Don before diving into another creamy scone and smacking his lips at the maid. Rodney was fairly petulant at this point and he said Don was old, as though he suspected nobody had noticed. Every nana with a blue rinse in Epsom responded by poking a needle in their doll of Rodney dancing in a tutu. Mr Boscowan fully endorsed the comment as an example of Rodney's political acumen. Such insightful political sense to alienate a good percentage of your voters who were already unhappy about Rodney perking a trip with his girlfriend at the taxpayers expense and saying 'it was good for me' but forgetting to ask the public 'was it good for you?'
In all an interesting and lively watch. Some other factors perhaps submerged in a plot that has seen Garrett, Power and perhaps now Rodney go. Time will tell. And also tell the power broker, dealer and who wins most.
Rodney Hide already sent to Conventry, his leadership under attack.
Then...
John Key implying a deal had been done with ACT in Epsom in the last week or so. Soon after Don Brash announcing a leadership bid for a party (ACT) of which he is yet to become a member, citing as an ally John Banks. Banks only saying that Epsom was over Hide. Don Brash talking in the tone of offers that can't be refused and going onto indicate he would form his own party if necessary but could see that ACT was already a runner and simply needed to get rid of rotten Rodney. Rodney and Boscowan indignant, talking about the democracy of their party as if in the rush of their propriety that had forgotten that they'd both been democratic with the truth over Mr Passport Peddler to the point that they kept quiet about it.
Meanwhile John, having a cup of tea with the Queen or somebody in London used his phone shoe to tell an eager NZ press, surprise, surprise, that he wouldn't rule out working with dear Don before diving into another creamy scone and smacking his lips at the maid. Rodney was fairly petulant at this point and he said Don was old, as though he suspected nobody had noticed. Every nana with a blue rinse in Epsom responded by poking a needle in their doll of Rodney dancing in a tutu. Mr Boscowan fully endorsed the comment as an example of Rodney's political acumen. Such insightful political sense to alienate a good percentage of your voters who were already unhappy about Rodney perking a trip with his girlfriend at the taxpayers expense and saying 'it was good for me' but forgetting to ask the public 'was it good for you?'
In all an interesting and lively watch. Some other factors perhaps submerged in a plot that has seen Garrett, Power and perhaps now Rodney go. Time will tell. And also tell the power broker, dealer and who wins most.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Joe Karam, Peter Jansen - something inconsistent here.
To TradeMe Support
Inconsistent treament of those defamed on Trade Me.
I note a second thread has been removed on the subject of Peter Jansen who is currently suing an ACC client. I am at lost of how this is reconciled with the fact that Bain threads remain, populated by the same people from the hate-sites that defamed Karam and Bain before, during and after the trial, despite Mr Karam bringing the same type of proceedings against TM as those of Peter Jensen who has done so against a client of ACC.
It can easily be argued that the threads in respect of Peter Jansen are benign in nature compared to those against Mr Karam where it continues that such idiots as obook (a probable soon named co-defendant,) Rachael Membery, Ralph Taylor, Black repeat the same lies run against Karam and Bain for many years and which were never proven in evidence and in many cases were not evidence at all but fabrications by a clique of those, that for whatever reason, identify with a dead paedophile, a bit of a fiddly situation you might agree. Trade Me are wholly responsible for those publications and have never sought to establish the veracity or honesty of the published material of the members of the now, closed to the public, hate-sites. I bring this to your attention once again formally as it is no doubt something that will become significant later in the proceedings TM now face.
It is an easily reached conclusion that there might be perceived some benefit to TM for TM to allow the defamation of Karam to continue. Every piece of disputed evidence or non evidence raised by the hate-siters above is a clear implication that Mr Karam has lied or rorted the system to the point that only a few enlightened sickos know the real 'truth.' This 'truth' TM continue to wittingly publish whilst at the same time silencing any on line conversation about another plaintiff who it happens is not suing TM. See any connection there? I do, and I'm sure many others will.
Anyway, I assume Mr Karam will have noted that TM act as a publisher when it suits them and the rest of the time pretend not to be, hard to figure out as well?
Warmest regards
PS. The deleted Jensen threads are saved to bear comparison with the undeleted Bain threads.
Inconsistent treament of those defamed on Trade Me.
I note a second thread has been removed on the subject of Peter Jansen who is currently suing an ACC client. I am at lost of how this is reconciled with the fact that Bain threads remain, populated by the same people from the hate-sites that defamed Karam and Bain before, during and after the trial, despite Mr Karam bringing the same type of proceedings against TM as those of Peter Jensen who has done so against a client of ACC.
It can easily be argued that the threads in respect of Peter Jansen are benign in nature compared to those against Mr Karam where it continues that such idiots as obook (a probable soon named co-defendant,) Rachael Membery, Ralph Taylor, Black repeat the same lies run against Karam and Bain for many years and which were never proven in evidence and in many cases were not evidence at all but fabrications by a clique of those, that for whatever reason, identify with a dead paedophile, a bit of a fiddly situation you might agree. Trade Me are wholly responsible for those publications and have never sought to establish the veracity or honesty of the published material of the members of the now, closed to the public, hate-sites. I bring this to your attention once again formally as it is no doubt something that will become significant later in the proceedings TM now face.
It is an easily reached conclusion that there might be perceived some benefit to TM for TM to allow the defamation of Karam to continue. Every piece of disputed evidence or non evidence raised by the hate-siters above is a clear implication that Mr Karam has lied or rorted the system to the point that only a few enlightened sickos know the real 'truth.' This 'truth' TM continue to wittingly publish whilst at the same time silencing any on line conversation about another plaintiff who it happens is not suing TM. See any connection there? I do, and I'm sure many others will.
Anyway, I assume Mr Karam will have noted that TM act as a publisher when it suits them and the rest of the time pretend not to be, hard to figure out as well?
Warmest regards
PS. The deleted Jensen threads are saved to bear comparison with the undeleted Bain threads.
Monday, April 25, 2011
Anzac Day for one young child..
A part of many lives that may never be reconciled, mystery and awe for the younger, sorrow, shame, or bonding pride for others. I remember too the old soldiers marching as though stepping from time and a life far away back into suburban streets, unpainted landscapes, drum beats upon the paved streets that children might wave and dream a dream of gallant lads whilst mothers watched thinking of a young man lost and being alone except for a war that never stopped.
This from projecthr...
I remember as an almost seven year old, marching beside my grandfather, at the Dawn parade in Auckland. It's one of those memories you never forget - the ceremony, the pride and honour of belonging to someone so much part of the day. It was his last ANZAC day.
As I marched along, holding my grandfather's sleeve, because he had lost an arm in WWI, I remember the other old soldiers around me, stopping to pat me on the head and smile, as if I was part of their family too.
I realise now I was. For them, the survivors of Gallipoli, a little six year old girl was what it was all about - their children and their children's children, and the thought of a better and free life for them all - that was why so many happily gave their time and for some their lives to fight a battle, that wasn't of their making.
You can argue over the politics or the right or wrongfulness of what was done during the wars this country has involved itself in - but in the end what matters most of all, is the men and woman who gave and suffered more than any of us have ever known - just to be sure we had a future.
Of course we will remember them - Lest We Forget
Quote
project_hr (2282 ) 10:34 am, Mon 25 Apr #14
This from projecthr...
I remember as an almost seven year old, marching beside my grandfather, at the Dawn parade in Auckland. It's one of those memories you never forget - the ceremony, the pride and honour of belonging to someone so much part of the day. It was his last ANZAC day.
As I marched along, holding my grandfather's sleeve, because he had lost an arm in WWI, I remember the other old soldiers around me, stopping to pat me on the head and smile, as if I was part of their family too.
I realise now I was. For them, the survivors of Gallipoli, a little six year old girl was what it was all about - their children and their children's children, and the thought of a better and free life for them all - that was why so many happily gave their time and for some their lives to fight a battle, that wasn't of their making.
You can argue over the politics or the right or wrongfulness of what was done during the wars this country has involved itself in - but in the end what matters most of all, is the men and woman who gave and suffered more than any of us have ever known - just to be sure we had a future.
Of course we will remember them - Lest We Forget
Quote
project_hr (2282 ) 10:34 am, Mon 25 Apr #14
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Scott Watson: The review of the convictions of Scott Watson has
finally reached Justice Minister Simon Power. The review took 2 years and cost $143,000, undertaken by Kristy McDonald at a cost between $350 to $400 per hour. Translated to an average hourly rate of $400 per hour, the actual review by time would have taken just over 7 weeks with an estimated hours worked per week as 50. Taking into account logistic difficulties, or inquiries to and advice from experts one could reasonably expect the nearly 2 months spent on the report could be tripled to 6, so what happened to the other 18months?
Unfortunately without explanations about that one could be left wondering about the competency of the review, and also the lack of priority it appears to have been given. Overall an impression is given about a reluctance to move by the Crown, a dragging of feet and we see history repeat itself where no urgency is applied to potential Miscarriages of Justice, no single body, financed by the Crown, able to dig into suspect convictions with energy and experience from having performed the task before. It's far from robust Justice and the idea that a Minister appoints somebody, for reasons of his or her own, to investigate such matters seems too casual and likely to greeted with scepticism by the public at large.
If people can robustly be thrown into prison on suspect evidence the same robust power should be available for those unfortunates to have hard questions asked in a timely manner by a properly constructed and designed independent body to weigh into the fray, with both power and neutral concepts of the soundness of the conviction. Others may have seen the interview with Aaron Farmer's mother recently where she was reduced to having to write letter after letter to anyone she could think of to have her innocent son released from prison. It's bloody mickey mouse, outdated and does not serve the master principle that 'justice must be seen to be done' with attendant haste.
Ultimately because of New Zealand's dim record of falsely imprisoning the innocent the conclusion reached by the public is that the Police do get it wrong and it is bloody hard, almost impossible to overcome. Responsibility for that lies with Parliament, advice should be taken from the Law Commission, The Chief Justice, The Law Society on the construction of a credible and accountable body being established to allow people such as Aaron Farmer's mother, Scott Watson's father, the late Vivien Harrison a place to take their concerns where they, and the public can have confidence that there is a passage out of prison for the falsely imprisoned that is not through the same corridors of the Department that have imprisoned them.
Petitioning the Governer General, as Scott Watson has done, is proven to a laborious task that ultimately reports back to the Justice Department anyway. The same folder that could have been sitting on Simon Power's desk 3 years ago only arrives now. And even the issue of where that folder or brief should go needs also to be look at. A statute other than habeas corpus should allow reviews or inquiries to go directly to the Courts, and not to the Government of the day. The procedure as it stands looks weighted in favour of the Crown. Who benefit's from a 2 year inquiry that only took something like 350 hours to complete, not Scott Watson, nor an interested public.
Before closing on the subject, in some details of the review it is revealed that Kirsty McDonald was unsuccessful in meeting one of the 2 'secret' witnesses who had recanted their testimony against Scott. Begging me to ask am I the only one that can see the King as no clothes. If this 'secret' person has recanted his testimony, throw the whole blinking lot out. Don't ask Kirsty McDonald to interview him, the testimony is shot and Kirsty McDonald interviewing him gives the impression that this person's evidence is important. Well, how can it be he's given two different stories and Kirsty's efforts to a sceptical mind present a conclusion that she might be trying to 'shore' up the evidence rather that rightfully dismiss it as it should be. Again this is an area for the Courts and history shows that as the strength of convictions is weakened a reliance is promoted on other material formerly considered to be marginal or less than important in upholding the conviction.
Unfortunately without explanations about that one could be left wondering about the competency of the review, and also the lack of priority it appears to have been given. Overall an impression is given about a reluctance to move by the Crown, a dragging of feet and we see history repeat itself where no urgency is applied to potential Miscarriages of Justice, no single body, financed by the Crown, able to dig into suspect convictions with energy and experience from having performed the task before. It's far from robust Justice and the idea that a Minister appoints somebody, for reasons of his or her own, to investigate such matters seems too casual and likely to greeted with scepticism by the public at large.
If people can robustly be thrown into prison on suspect evidence the same robust power should be available for those unfortunates to have hard questions asked in a timely manner by a properly constructed and designed independent body to weigh into the fray, with both power and neutral concepts of the soundness of the conviction. Others may have seen the interview with Aaron Farmer's mother recently where she was reduced to having to write letter after letter to anyone she could think of to have her innocent son released from prison. It's bloody mickey mouse, outdated and does not serve the master principle that 'justice must be seen to be done' with attendant haste.
Ultimately because of New Zealand's dim record of falsely imprisoning the innocent the conclusion reached by the public is that the Police do get it wrong and it is bloody hard, almost impossible to overcome. Responsibility for that lies with Parliament, advice should be taken from the Law Commission, The Chief Justice, The Law Society on the construction of a credible and accountable body being established to allow people such as Aaron Farmer's mother, Scott Watson's father, the late Vivien Harrison a place to take their concerns where they, and the public can have confidence that there is a passage out of prison for the falsely imprisoned that is not through the same corridors of the Department that have imprisoned them.
Petitioning the Governer General, as Scott Watson has done, is proven to a laborious task that ultimately reports back to the Justice Department anyway. The same folder that could have been sitting on Simon Power's desk 3 years ago only arrives now. And even the issue of where that folder or brief should go needs also to be look at. A statute other than habeas corpus should allow reviews or inquiries to go directly to the Courts, and not to the Government of the day. The procedure as it stands looks weighted in favour of the Crown. Who benefit's from a 2 year inquiry that only took something like 350 hours to complete, not Scott Watson, nor an interested public.
Before closing on the subject, in some details of the review it is revealed that Kirsty McDonald was unsuccessful in meeting one of the 2 'secret' witnesses who had recanted their testimony against Scott. Begging me to ask am I the only one that can see the King as no clothes. If this 'secret' person has recanted his testimony, throw the whole blinking lot out. Don't ask Kirsty McDonald to interview him, the testimony is shot and Kirsty McDonald interviewing him gives the impression that this person's evidence is important. Well, how can it be he's given two different stories and Kirsty's efforts to a sceptical mind present a conclusion that she might be trying to 'shore' up the evidence rather that rightfully dismiss it as it should be. Again this is an area for the Courts and history shows that as the strength of convictions is weakened a reliance is promoted on other material formerly considered to be marginal or less than important in upholding the conviction.
Friday, April 22, 2011
Peter Jansen is angry.
You can tell that because he's hit a pillow with a rock. Peter Jansen don't like it if you say he's cheating some way, maybe being a prick and making money for it. He doesn't like to be criticised. If you criticise Peter Jansen he might sue you - he'll hit a pillow with a rock. Peter Jansen says if you're in his care and don't like it you can't say anything because he'll take all the money off you that you don't have.
Old Pete should lighten up, being angry all the time might affect his gonads. He could lose his gonads and end up suing one of his patients just because he's uptight worrying about what people are saying about him being tied up with the other mob, ACC. Pete seems to think he's not working for the mob, he should realise by now that the whole country knows that he is and that some of the more sceptical think he's milking it. Buy a cowshed Pete, one of those old fashion ones and run a few dairy cows. It might help.
Pete don't seem so bright. Pete is making a fool of himself in a fight he can't win. Pete, the silly man, is making a right prick of himself proving that he is one.
Old Pete should lighten up, being angry all the time might affect his gonads. He could lose his gonads and end up suing one of his patients just because he's uptight worrying about what people are saying about him being tied up with the other mob, ACC. Pete seems to think he's not working for the mob, he should realise by now that the whole country knows that he is and that some of the more sceptical think he's milking it. Buy a cowshed Pete, one of those old fashion ones and run a few dairy cows. It might help.
Pete don't seem so bright. Pete is making a fool of himself in a fight he can't win. Pete, the silly man, is making a right prick of himself proving that he is one.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)