As 13,000 unique visitor mark is passed the District Court Hearing approaches.

One common characteristic is those that were once the most vocal want to avoid Court. I can concede that might be for a number of reasons but I think purely it is because they simply don't have the courage. It's one thing to lie for years about a case and cackle and giggle as people with nothing to do with the case have their privacy invaded and strangers talking about them and threatening them on line. I suppose it's the safety in numbers situation, the ability to be all powerful from behind a computer screen and the reluctance to appear in the cold light of day to reveal a persona something less than powerful or even lucid.

How terrific they must have felt when one of their associates threatened my family with a visit from the Mongrel Mob, using in true hollywood fashion the line 'this is a promise not a threat.' How confident they must have been that such threats finally proved they were not persecutors but rather a voice that transcended what other might consider normal and made threats, and hate messages 'freedom of speech.'

The case remains quite clear in that harassment did take place, and that the respondents were a party to it. The only issue is whether or not the harassment took place as a group effort or as an individual effort, to prove the former I have information from the damned ones own sites, conversations of the respondents that shows a campaign not only against those that objected to them lying and stalking but their families and friends as well. Maybe, that is the reason for their reluctance now the sheer bitterness and hate of their actions recoils even themselves from self-respect and they don't want to face it.

It is with some irony that the frenetic 3 now drape their activities as 'public debate' totally overlooking the fact that I was not debating with them and my family certainly were not. One goes even so far to say that his was 'free speech' a situation by which in his disordered mind one can lie their heads off to harm others and call it freedom of speech. I need these individuals assembled to be cross-examined, and will appeal any moves for them to avoid it not missing the irony that these were once 'men' in full flight with fury against whomever they saw in their way and who now which to be silent and be sympathised with.