There is nothing wrong with Panckhurst.
He is an extremely competent and experienced judge.
Quotenina_s (94 ) 10:31 pm, Tue 30 Nov #11
This from nina_concertina who dined out on the alleged conduct of the Christchurch Jury in the Bain trial just last year. She along with another fat arse, (fat tony) rodney osook (want to be forensic psychiatrist - but actually only a plagiarist) for a considerable period were Panckhurst chief critics, both for his trial rulings but primarily for ignoring 'misconduct' of the Jury, the implication that corruption was afoot and being the reason why the twisted sister hate-siters lost their 'in the bag' trial. You suck Sarah, you're a full of crap spinner with your countless false identities and it is all recorded in a file name 'Defamation nina_s.'
She had this to say about Michael Laws the other day, despite praising him when he debated with Karam.
ReplyDelete"Further proof that Laws loves himself.
The comments are CLEARLY his own. He is his own fan club. How deeply embarassing to be caught out."
nina_s (94 ) 10:00 pm, Sun 28 Nov
Nina is nasty and vindictive to everyone on the boards on many subjects. She has barely a nice or positive thing to say to anyone. Obviously she has suffered some personal tragedy that gives her permission to be so spiteful. She seems to live on the boards in a variety of id's(all pretty obvious) it's probably her only source of contact with others, as I'm sure the rest of the world would take care to avoid her poison.
A very sad tormented soul indeed.
One of the very obvious things about Nina (Sarah) has always been her need to condemn in others what dwells inside herself. Her comments about Laws apply equally, in fact more, to her own fractured self. But she is great entertainment, a true spinner. I must find and post at some point her adoption, or admission of being a voice expert, it was really something and in her haste to be recognised as important and knowledgeable she is recorded as saying the 111 call as genuine - possibly the only thing she has ever been right about. She of course, later tried to squeeze out of that, but myself and Lee Hinkleman graciously use to repost her post about 50 times a day just to help her out. We were pretty good like that, helping out the sisters.
ReplyDeleteHave you noticed how she leaps to the defence of the police at any slight opportunity? Now, most police may be very good, but in any large organisation you get bad apples, and in an organisation where power and dominance is required, you get more. So what's her connection with the police?
ReplyDeletecurious said...
ReplyDeleteYes, I have noticed that. Unfortunately, such a defence on any such occasion is soon seen as a pattern of blind acceptance of even questionable behaviour and renders the applause or defence as valueless because it is always expected. Subtleties like that escape the comprehension of nina_s who is a dullard.
I don't know what her connection is with the police or indeed if she even has one. Frankly, nina_s couldn't really be seen as being helpful to the police because she displays unrestrained idiocy.