Isn't incredible but of no surprise really how frank and the cult of David will go to all kind's of lengths to worm and squirm their way out of all kinds of inconvenient facts such as the broken spectacles (of use to David but of know use to Robin-fact) including it seems the possibility he may of worn them broken that weekend.A major concession there namelthhat hat he in fact was wearing them).
Another detail that they conveniently overlook is that Milton Weir must of somehow known that the broken specs were of use to David on the first day of the investigation which of course is utterly balmy and stupid.But that is all the cult have to try and explain the lens planting allegation.
Edited by jeeves-50 at 5:36 pm, Thu 2 Dec
Quotejeeves-50 (3 ) 5:33 pm, Thu 2 Dec #30904
You bloody idiot Weir didn't 'find' the lens on the first day of the inquiry, stop with your lies. You are from the cult of kiddie f...ers. You live in the same city as me, bring out your big mouth and lets see what you've got Taylor you filthy pervert. Have you got the courage of your convictions or are you just a lying, stalking kiddie fiddler hidden away with your filthy secrets. Come out Taylor scumbag and we'll discuss rotten daddy's blood in the barrel, the blood of his family on his shoe and the way you persecute his son you slimy piece of crap let's see if you have just an ounce of guts or if all you can do is spread hate and malice from your coven you gutless dog.
Go easy on poor Ralph - I suspect he might be a bit slow to understand - or 'balmy' as he writes. It's a new part of their mantra: that for David to be fitted up, Weir would have had to know he needed those glasses on the first day. But it's a bit weak - after all, the cop who handled those glasses has said David asked for them on the first day, and he knew they were broken. So Weir would have known that first day too. Taylor has an agenda...
ReplyDeleteHe does have an agenda and it is becoming increasingly obvious that it is protect a paedophile, or a paedophile group, now why would he do that. The same with Stockdale who 'innocently' explained how a 'father' would instruct a female child to put her fingers inside herself. And Denise Cameron 'explaining' how children commonly make up those sorts of things to get attention. These are some kind of sick dudes.
ReplyDeleteI should imagine the JFRB group is very busy constructing agendas to keep their campaign going. Surely they aren't all so dim that they haven't noticed noone is interested in what they have to say.
ReplyDeleteThey have three specific problems as I see it, maybe more.
ReplyDelete1/They've been identified as hate-sites operating outside the law as it suits them, including lying, stalking, threatening and so forth.
2/They obviously have paedophiles or paedophile supporters among their number and that goes down like a lead ballon.
3/The forensic evidence against Robin is complete and all the talk about what David said or didn't say or what is Aunt said or didn't say is redundant. I use to think the upward trajectory contact shot was the sole clincher but we all know now there was blood in the barrel and someone else's blood on Robin's right shoe. We also know the old favourites like the 'injuries' to David were not noted (in the case of his head injuried) before his fall, and in the case of the marks to his chest not noted at all despite a strip search and thorough examination by a police doctor on the morning of crimes.
They're stuff and shafted, with stalking, lies, threats their only weapons that we are now all awake to.