Thursday, November 4, 2010

Sorry Rachael, Sophier gets the Retard of the Week.



Here's why

project_hr wrote:

Regarding the debate, would you like me to post the entries from the freeforum sites, db and guilty, where they discussed the poll and how they were voting on it multiple times? I even have a comment from JFRB f/b where it's discussed how to vote more than once on the polls. The poll was unscientific and fixed. I seriously recommend you don't mention it.

then Sophier...

There was nothing wrong with the poll, people from both sides voted and the result was that 83% thought DB was the killer, sure there may have been some double voting by some people but are you seriously expecting me to believe that the pro DB people are so squeaky clean that they never did the same thing, that is pure fantasy, Karam was up against a good opponent so he resorted to some serious misinformation to try to win the debate he failed miserably the public of NZ in general Can see right through him and DB.

Well, I can tell you Sophier most of us knew that the hangbainers multi voted, but thanks for confirming it. Right retarded of ya.

Sophie again...

Here is the copy of the total misinformation from Karam if you have not seen it before, read it, then try to explain why Karam said what he said, surely he knew what he was saying was not the truth.

Karams version of what constable Andrews said at court, from radio live.

Karam [Quote] David Bain did faint, when he fainted he crashed down between, and banged his head, the officer Andrews who was with David when David fainted and crashed down behind the bed saw David crash down behind the bed and it was the constable Andrews who gave this evidence about him crashing down and banging his head on the wall by the window sill in his bedroom on the right side of his face, now that’s the evidence in the trial. [End Quote]

And here we have what the officer Andrews actually said, from page 336 of the transcripts
336 Constable Andrews answers questions.
Q. And then the accused falling back?
A. Backwards, yeah.
Q. Backwards. Did you observe him hit his head or strike any part of his body?
A. NO I DIDEN'T.


Just when TM are sorting out their defamation problems a retard happens along, you can always tell a retard because they all look the same, sort of vacant like the want to pick their nose because a seagull might have flown up it.

Very simple to follow what Joe Karam said, and the police officer confirmed - that David fell down beside the bed where of course Andrews couldn't have seen him bang his head because there was a bed in the way. Of course Andrews evidence corroborated David's evidence on the matter at the first trial and the bruises also corroborated it. A person of reasonable intelligence would follow that, but you are a retard Sophie. Good work, turning some simple event into a crisis, like trying to work out how to get a seagull out of your nose that might not even be there. So thanks for that, and thanks for confirming that many of you followed Kent's instructions and multi-voted. And I might also say thanks for the added defamatory comment you've made against Joe Karam, should he want to extend his writ.

I suspect you are the banned poster kirkmaiden who also had an obsessiveness with cut and pasting and putting his or her foot in. It's an evident procedure with retards repeating the same thing even when it's obviously wrong. Thanks, right retarded of ya.

No comments:

Post a Comment