Robin's bruised and bloodied hands.

This week we've already had the opportunity to read a 'speech' by Kent Parker running down Joe Karam and calling him a liar for information Joe provided from the trail manuscript on the recent radio debate. And of course we've seen the brief of evidence from urologist that showed that Joe was telling the truth from evidence that campmother didn't know about despite holding himself up as more of an expert than Joe Karam on the Bain case.

So lets look at another fallacy perpetuated by the hangbainers. When I first started reading about the Bain case, approaching 2 years ago, and when I was treated as is any other new entrant, with the 'truth' from the hangbainers in order to convince me to join the 'team' I was told that Robin had no bruises or injuries to his hands and no blood. Shortly after, Lee H, my old mate, posted photos showing marks and cuts to Robin's hands along with blood spatter. I was always interested in the hands of the father and of the son because I couldn't imagine the killer's hand would be without damage of some sort. Immediately from the hate-siters the 'damage' became scratches that had 'happened' when Robin had been cleaning out the gutters of the house the day before. Nobody saw the damage happen then of course, but that was no discouragement because it was a 'fact' known by the hangbainers. Another 'fact' was that the injuries were over 24 hours old and the blood, by assumption, was the product of Robin being shot in the head. All this information was available on line and in the truth forums of the hate-siters. Whoopi!

But of course we were to find out that the injuries according to the attending pathologists were minutes to 24 hours old, not to forget here that foremost expert at the scene that morning, the pathologist, a man with vast experience, was kept from the scene for many hours while items were moved and photographed and the scene carefully 'preserved.' Then looking at the photo produced in Court it was able to be seen that the blood spray on Robin's fingernail was going the 'wrong' way (taking into account that spatter fans out from point of contact and widens in the direction it has taken) and therefore could have been spatter from one of his victims.

But newer information was that just prior to the trial Joe Karam was given photos and scene notes that showed Robin had blood 'smears' on the palms of his hands meaning of course that he had contact blood wipe on his hands before he shot himself. Contact blood wipe alone, and despite all the other evidence showing he was the killer, proves that Robin killed his family and then suicided. Additionally, his blood was found not only inside the rifle silencer but also inside the barrel. I think most people know that each time a rifle is fired the barell is 'cleaned' by the discharge and also the pressure inside Robin's head when he shot himself was caused by the velocity of the bullet and discharge out of the wound and into the barrel that he had rested his head against. All of Robin's victims were shot with a downward, killer dominant trajectory, his own passive death was a rising shot into his brain. These are things that can never be changed however much the hate-siters want to re-explain them or attempt to dilute the impact, but perhaps the simplest of all was the killers bruised and bloody hands told the story a desperate few wish to deny.