Mike Stockdale, still a filthy liar...

The filthy liar persists....


ash204 wrote:

OH, AND ALL THIS FROM A BOY WHO DOESNT BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY BLOOD IN THE BARREL!!


There was no blood in the barrel of the rifle,according to the ESR scientist who checked it.
But as I have just pointed out,for the umpteenth time,it makes absolutely no difference to the fact that David Bain murdered his family.

Edited by supersleuth at 10:00 pm, Wed 3 Nov

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 9:53 pm, Wed 3 Nov #29137

What only part of the evidence says...

Peter Ross, p3653-3654

A. It wasn’t provided to me, so it’s something which I haven't seen.
Q. If the case note records that, “Blood was found on the silencer, extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,” that’s what it’s saying here. Does that accord with the answer you gave Mr Mander in relation to the vacuum effect and hard contact wound?
A. Oh it does, it indicates that, I mean, there are a number of people who have been shot. It indicates that at least one of those suffered a relatively hard contact wound.

So the Court Record is wrong according to the Stockdale because he talked to the scientist whose notes record 'extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,' but who no according to Stockdale can't remember his own notes. Sure.

Extensive smearing showing that Stockdale is an extensive liar, an old pedo-apologist fool. He wouldn't take a bet because he's a gutless coward, he knows he's peddling lies and that it is the intention of the pedo-sects to protect the memory of one of their own. It's self-interest lies to cover up what they can't hide. The more they do to 'protect' the memory of Robin Bain at the expense of his own wife and children, the more they expose his memory as a fiddler.

As it transpires, the single evidence of the blood in the barrel was sufficient forensic proof to prove that the family deaths were murder and the death of Robin suicide. The police rushed in before evaluating all the evidence carefully and deliberately, they were looking for a quick fix or perhaps to have information buried from public sight. The Crown have never independently resolved the issue of the blood in the rifle because they can't without acknowledging it proves suicide. For those that may not know, none of the above quoted evidence (and there is a lot more) was called or challenged by the Crown - they ignored it from the safety of silence. As far as I know not one newspaper detailed the evidence, except for the brief touching upon it by the Judge in his closing address. That is a frightening thought, that the most significant evidence was never published. Even the 'great' and 'experienced' jury stalker van beynan dared not touch upon it in discredited 'opinion' piece in The Press.

I have some doubts that some of the investigating staff understood the significance of extensive blood in the barrel, and really they should have had specialists help with that, if not from the ESR then from overseas where the phenomenon is more readily understood and catalogued - then the country would not have had to go through this saga, David would have been left alone as was his right, and we would never have seen exposed pedo-cults led by 1/2 brained idiots like Stockdale and Parker covering up for one of their own.