What do you call an idiot who takes a week to work out what happened..
First this from Parker....
October 27 Teleconference
As a result of the teleconference of 27 October, the Parker - Purkiss defence team have been requested to rewrite their Defence yet again, due to supposed breaches of High Court Rules. The Second Amended Defence is due to be submitted mid December and another conference is scheduled for 16 February 2011. On the agenda for that conference is the setting of a trial date. Given that the waiting list in the High Court, which is typically 6 months in most districts, is likely to be most of a year in Auckland, a trial date is not going to happen any time soon.
The more that the Plaintiff draws out the pre-trial proceedings the more expensive it becomes for him. At present, the plaintiff has neither furnished a response to the defence nor an explanation of supposed problems with it.
Then this.....
Defence Statement does not have to be Rewritten
We apologise, the news item of 27 October was incorrect. The defence statement does not have to be rewritten. It is simply that the counsel for the Plaintiff (Joe Karam) has disputed its contents and some pre-trial deliberation has been set in motion which will drag on until both parties finally agree. The Statement of Defence has been accepted by the Court. Any disputes arising from it merely help to hammer it out into a form that can more easily be digested by the trial process undertaken by each party in the dispute.
You call them: Moron of the Week for being a 'genius' who has no idea what's going on.
You deserve it Kent, a fine fully moronic display of an idiot representing themselves...
No comments:
Post a Comment