I am sure that if the experiments had been done correctly the prints would have excluded Robin as the method would have resulted in prints from a person of Robin's build the luminol result would have revealed a print of around 25-26 cm at most and a person of DB build a print of 27-29 cm.
Quotelinz4me (276 ) 10:55 am, Sun 24 Oct #28551
Lindsay Kennard is trying to cover up Robin's footprints as quickly as he'd now like to cover up that he told the world his wife said he was fiddler...
Not only that, he introduces new science, where you don't measure prints you concentrate on the build (if known) of the person who left the print. So by this bewildering logic footprints by measurement are now made redundant in any forensic inquiry and not compared to a suspects foot size, no, it's the build of the person that made them that matters. The fact that a 6 footer might have size nine shoes, and someone five foot eight size twelve, doesn't mean a thing. In Lindsay's world of high alcohol and drug content, with fiddling on the side, Jury's will be shown a footprint and be invited to guess whose it is based on a formula that Kennard will one day work out with help from his psychiatrist.
No comments:
Post a Comment