Jeeve's (Ralph) having a go for the Moron's title.

And this early in the week, he's very desperate for that title. How's this?

Much has been made of the Blood in the barrel and I can't find a reference for it on google except it was mentioned by the Defence in their summing up.But where did they get their information from. It has to be one of the Crown's expert witnesses either Dr Ferris,Dr Thompson,Dr Elliot or Henschell etc.?Or was it Dr Manlove ?Anyhow it is pretty academic given that David's rifle was fired at point blank range at Laniet leaving a "gaping hole" that alone must of left lot's of blood in the barrel.

Quotejeeves-50 (3 ) 3:10 pm, Tue 31 Aug #23554

Now this from a man who is more than willing to call people perjurers, the Jury corrupt, single out Karam for abuse all to persecute David Bain. Some part of me thinks that it is very important to be sure of what you decide your position on, for example not on anti or pro Police bias, or anti or pro lawyer bias, race or colour, a person's looks, or gut feelings, perceived omniscience. You need the facts and even when you have them and are satisfied that they give you the true picture, one would then need to ask what do I do with my position? Am I justified in persecuting somebody for example, does the world benefit by my persecuting somebody even when they are 'apparently' evil or bad or some other thing we might not approve of. So there perhaps are two hurdles, or restraints I imagine, before climbing on the persecution bandwagon, being sure, weighing the alleged benefit from your act of persecution - and finally probably a third thing: common sense before you plaid the proverbial hang man's noose.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/2471577/Bain-jury-told-to-ignore-emotion

Where the Judge in summary of the defence says,

-'There was blood spatter inside the rifle barrel indicating a close-range final shot'

So we see two things a close-range final shot evidenced by the blood spatter and something else, - the clear indication of what anybody who wasn't a moron would know, that the rifle barel was effectively cleaned after each shot, hence the words close-rang final shot. So Jeeves, known on the hate-sites as Ralph, displays for once and all that he has been a mindless persecutor for over a year, never having been able to pass the first hurdle, ie being informed and sure of the facts. When he has 'heard' of the blood spatter he suspects it is a lie, then qualifies that if it isn't that DNA can exist in a rifle after the previous 'cleaning out' shot. The guy is a raging idiot, from a hate-site of frothing at the mouth raging idiots. I think he's got next week's award covered. Though he should get another, one for having no shame in being totally wrong about something, of not researching and jumping to conclusions, to only know a small sample of the evidence but take great leaps of supposition all to support something already decided overwhich he pretends to be an expert. Yes.

Oh I see some late patronising comment from Jeevo the devo.

Am sorry ro but all I am doing is presenting facts which you choose to react and be blind to.Learn to be a person not an emotional reaction.No one is responsible for the way you feel.Only you are.And I am not on weak ground!

Edited by jeeves-50 at 3:15 pm, Tue 31 Aug

Quotejeeves-50 (3 ) 3:14 pm, Tue 31 Aug #23555