Saturday, October 15, 2022

Watson case cracks open even more.

                                         More than one swallow for Scott Watson at last.


The last post about Scott was a recognition that he is finally tasting success in his fight for freedom. It would be rare however that 2 single events have happened on just one day as they did on October 14. 

Firstly the man that verballed Scott claiming he said at the time of his arrest the words "it's about time," was mentioned in the news as New Zealand's "Top Detective" retired prematurely. Looking at the facts surrounding the man one is entitled to say, as rarely happens in the police, he was pushed out as it appears was the officer in charge of the case, Pope, many years earlier. Fitzgerald claims that he will be doing further contract work for the police. The direct cause of his retirement is more likely his sudden fall from grace after the Court of Appeal rejected his system of lying to suspects in order for them to confess or reveal details when they were not cautioned that anything they might say could be used against them. The particular case was where an innocent man "confessed." I don't think he should or will get work from the police, if he does there is likely to be a public furore.

In the manner expected of such a man, Fitzgerald blamed his own staff for not applying the methods properly thus exposing his true nature of doing anything to anybody to save his own neck. My interest in the man goes back prior to 2016 when research showed that during Watson's first Royal Prerogative of Mercy (RPOM) application and at a time the case was being investigated by then QC Kirsty McDonald now of course a KC, he was permitted not only entry to Paremoremo Prison but allowed to see a secret witness who had recanted his claim that Scott had confessed. The normal protocol when an investigation was undertaken about police conduct was that police would be unable to approach the witness, but that did stop dear old Tom and as it turns out it didn't bother Kirsty either. Probably no surprise that the witness recanted his recantation allowing Kirsty to reject Scott's plea.

Things did not stop there however although they were delayed for some years until a 2nd RPOM was filed on Scott's behalf where among other issues it was pointed out that if a person says "yes, no, yes" they are unreliable, particularly having given evidence of a confession that sent a man away for life. It also reflected not on the conduct of Fitzgerald but also on the judgment of the then McDonald QC. Complicating the issue for the pair was that the RPOM pointed out that a second witness who claimed to hear a confession had a different story than the first. The 2nd man had claimed to the Jury that he was non-violent and objected to violence against women as the reason for his evidence. Later it was revealed in fact to be a violent man which was known to Fitzgerald, particularly against women who on the day he told Fitzgerald about the "confession" had just taken part in a violent assault against another inmate - something Fitzgerald didn't bother to charge him for. Those revelations in part may have driven Scott's first-ever legal success in the case since he was arrested along with issues regarding the "gold plated" hair evidence against him that has now caused his case to return to the Courts.

While the public may not know all these details police certainly will and indeed will politicians. Keeping a lid on all of that plus what is now arguably an illegal interrogation method, the public concern about Scott's case could see a feeling that any future role with police for Fitzgerald has become untenable. Furthermore, he failed to take responsibility for his own system and blamed his staff. Ms. McDonald, who was undisturbed that the mentally unwell witness who recanted after being visited by Fitzgerald also ignored that a person doesn't give variations of a "true" confession, is having some trouble of her own prosecuting the White Island case where a 2nd defendant has already been discharged despite her objections.

The second "swallow" which indicates that summer may, at last,  be arriving on the Watson Miscarriage of Justice has been the release of material around which reports to the Parole Board have relied and it is expecting some clarity will emerge giving Scott the chance of parole before his appeal is heard and indeed the chance to help with it. Few of us if any can ever grasp what Scott Watson has gone through so progressing now without the fog sees him having a good chance to make it home at last.

6 comments:

  1. Good luck be positive things will come right and some one will pay for mistakes

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pope might have been the boss but it was Sir Tom who framed Scott. Confessions to secret witnesses were of his making, changing statements from others without their knowledge, bullying poor Guy to change his memory of what was corroborated by others, refusal to follow up the many sightings of a young couple on a ketch, the list goes on. Given the pedigree of this manipulator, was he also responsible for the providing of hairs for the lab to find? Yes, it is better for him to go before Scott’s appeal proves the hairs were not fit for presentation at Scott’s trial. His guilt in this framing is irrefutable with recorded documentation, the only question is whether he did it on his own accord or under instruction.

    ReplyDelete
  3. why is it that Pope & his cohorts are not brought to justice for the wrongs theyve done in the Scott Watson case ?its like the Arthur Allan Thomas case where Hutton planted a false shell and got away with it ==where is justice ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I spoke to the owner of the ketch I’m question some years later in 2001 whilst sharing C Pier at Westpark Marina in Hobsonville! His name was John and changed the boats name to Sylvia, his daughters namesake!
    He told me that Sylvia was there the night in question. Even more disturbing was the paint colour of the aft cabin which was mentioned in one of the statements given. Brass Portholes with a stripe around the middle and lots of rope in the cock pit! I reported my findings to the police via email with no response.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Our woeful police force. It’s all about power and ego.
    We need an independent review office to investigate the police and other miscarriages of justice.
    Lazy policing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. disturbing, if this was my son wrongly convicted, I'd be devastated. Best of luck next year Scott, family and supporters. Wrong person jailed, actual perpetrator/s still out there!!

    ReplyDelete