to fame is that she was best buddies with Laniet Bain, despite the spinner's own sister saying that was a lie and it was actually she, the sister, that had been friends with Laniet. Who would you believe, a spinner who wrote a 'confession' so full of inconsistencies and mixed language of both a child and an experienced adult that the 'confession' read like something written by a psychologist evoking language and practice of the 90s? Who would you believe, somebody who put on a 'grave side' show as a memorial for the Bains but nobody turned up except the spinner and a photographer who fell asleep waiting for the crowd that never arrived?
Would you believe the person that wrote this....
cybernana wrote:
Right....well, we will find out more today, won't we? I must admit, I am looking forward to hearing more on nos's blog later. Either they were banned from here, and you told a lie, or they had their posts removed voluntarily knowing there was evidence against them contained in their posts. Either way, they are gone. Hahaha.
Wrong on both counts. Have you not heard of TEMPORARY SUSPENSION while things are being sorted? And remember, he who laughs, or she, laughs last.
Quote
sweet_ad (185 ) 11:14 am, Mon 21 Mar #31710
Or would you believe a spokesperson for TM who said the dreadful 3 of today (and therefore utimately the dreaded others named in the defamation case) were on their own.
I recall writing about this earlier when the hate-siters were going on about 'freedom of speech' and TM sticking up for the hate-siters rights. Well, I'm telling you to suck kumara like you were told over a year ago, so who would believe? Looks like some motor mouth defamers might be getting a call - but don't believe me.
Sweet_ad is a liar and has been caught out several times. She has told so many now that she is having to spend all her energy trying to account for them all. She forgets there were many who attended Bayfield High with the Bains, and none of them remember the events as she does. One or two she has managed to bully have made obscure statements, but that is all.
ReplyDeleteShe was a more effective bully in the playground, which is how she thinks she knows David and his siblings so well. But bullying them does not make them, close friends.
She should ask herself why is she the only one speaking out like she is, and then she might realise it's because others know the truth, and don't want to support her lies.
It's some kind of sick to write a confession, but if one were do it a certain amount of intelligence would be required to match the age of the (in this case) child, their langauge, logic and fears. Melanie White missed the bus completely, even had Laniet disappearing to some where she felt 'safe' but without any alarm being raised by her own family. It went on to the point where the narrator was leading the dialogue as though she were an adult and not a child. Real sick, and designed to raise the 'status' of Melanie White at the expense of an innocent man. A horror story really, by a nutter.
ReplyDelete