If I was a low life scum bag that murdered my own family, Id be low enough to lie to get of. Its not about me, I could never even comprehend an act that vile. The proof is indisputable. That part has been debated ENDLESSLY so no need to do so further. He wont be able to prove his innocence in front of intelligent people so it will cost NZ millions more. I cant see the reason why we cant sue back. Whats the harm? If he can prove his innocence, then giVe him the money. But if he is a GUILTY low life scum sucking leach? HANG EM!
Quoteskylab6 (143 ) 11:01 pm, Tue 28 Dec #347
We are to take it from this frothing idiot that the 'proof is indisputable.' Another great advertisement for Kent Parker and the 'girls.' His explanation of how the father's blood and brains got inside the rifle, and the blood and brains of his children on his right shoe is so indisputable he doesn't even explain it - if the idiot even knows about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment