I've started this blog to share with those that may be interested in sports, books, topical news and the justice system as it applies to cyberspace and generally.
Monday, November 1, 2010
The reason Stockdale and Taylor won't take a bet, they're full of
That wasn't the horse's mouth you were listening to Mike. Come on, take the bet. Don't pretend you want to save me money. Man up, front up.
Doesn't matter even if he was talking to the man himself. That is not provable unless he gets a written statement. Sluperdoof wouldn't accept your word on something, and he's dreaming if he expects anyone to blindly accept his.
I don't accept his word at all. I offered him the wager, happy to do it through a solicitor. His problem is that is that he can't show that blood wasn't in the barrel and that it wasn't a hard contact shot, he also can't show that the last shot fired wasn't the one that deposited the blood in the barrel. Also he can't show that David wasn't subjected to a humiliating examination on the morning of the murders while rotten Robin, who proof-positive was the killer, went untested. I want Stockdale to front up, to attempt to prove that he's not a lying arse..pe.
Plop, plop plop - he's a regular fertilizer station. Imagine his hallway and front door entrance, it's no wonder he's got an oxygen tube strapped to the chimney. I betcha he's got rhubard growing everywhere, rhubard, rhubard, rhubard. But did you recognise that horse's arse? It seems familiar. It looks too small for Annette Curran, but maybe it was 1 and 1/2 centuries ago when she was a young filly.
There's only one thing holding them back and that's same thing that's exposing them now as liars.
Understanding the importance of that evidence, along with the clarity of it, makes me wonder why the Jury weren't back in 5 minutes with an acquittal. It proves what's been obvious since day 1, rotten daddy did it.
But then again, I could be bsing, and it could cost me $12,000 - but my money is on the table along with the credibility of my beliefs.
Doesn't matter even if he was talking to the man himself. That is not provable unless he gets a written statement. Sluperdoof wouldn't accept your word on something, and he's dreaming if he expects anyone to blindly accept his.
ReplyDeleteI don't accept his word at all. I offered him the wager, happy to do it through a solicitor. His problem is that is that he can't show that blood wasn't in the barrel and that it wasn't a hard contact shot, he also can't show that the last shot fired wasn't the one that deposited the blood in the barrel. Also he can't show that David wasn't subjected to a humiliating examination on the morning of the murders while rotten Robin, who proof-positive was the killer, went untested.
ReplyDeleteI want Stockdale to front up, to attempt to prove that he's not a lying arse..pe.
clippity clop, plop, plop! old sleuthie knows he's talking a load of crap
ReplyDeletePlop, plop plop - he's a regular fertilizer station. Imagine his hallway and front door entrance, it's no wonder he's got an oxygen tube strapped to the chimney. I betcha he's got rhubard growing everywhere, rhubard, rhubard, rhubard. But did you recognise that horse's arse? It seems familiar. It looks too small for Annette Curran, but maybe it was 1 and 1/2 centuries ago when she was a young filly.
ReplyDeletewhat, they've not taken you up on the bet yet? just think...it could provide a few hours of legal advice to Mr Parker, who sorely needs it.
ReplyDeleteWhat's holding them back? Could it be that they know they can't win and it would cost them?
There's only one thing holding them back and that's same thing that's exposing them now as liars.
ReplyDeleteUnderstanding the importance of that evidence, along with the clarity of it, makes me wonder why the Jury weren't back in 5 minutes with an acquittal. It proves what's been obvious since day 1, rotten daddy did it.
But then again, I could be bsing, and it could cost me $12,000 - but my money is on the table along with the credibility of my beliefs.