Well stop posting and go back to that blog and join the others there with their snouts in the swill.The tread here is about defending the good name and character of Robin Bain which the defence in the retrial went out of their way to trash and assisnate while his son watched silently and smugly on.Not brave enough to take the stand and face close scrutiny and gain incriminate himself as he did so expertly in the first trial.
Edited by jeeves-50 at 11:51 am, Sun 14 Nov
Quotejeeves-50 (3 ) 11:43 am, Sun 14 Nov #29899
You are not really the person to be talking about bravery Ralph Taylor, afterall you are one of the head pedo-supporters. You are also the one that denied that David was stripped searched, that Daddy's blood was in the barrel or that he had high-velocity spatter on his shoe. Now, you did hang your credibility on those main issues, in fact as it is now proven, lied about them along with the damage to daddy's hands and the 'scratches' your 'friend' Denise Cameron saw. You hung your hat out on the claim that Joe Karam was the liar, not you. Well, we know who the liars are now don't we Ralphie? There can only be one reason that you lie about the case Taylor and that is that you're intent on covering up for a dead pedo. Why do you do that Ralph? Do you belong to some organisation that supports paedophilia and protects offenders? That's what it looks like Ralph, because when the forensic truth has come out showing Robin's proven culpability you are silent on the question and instead attack David fully well knowing the forensic proof against daddy cannot be rebutted and the evidence of the 'extensive' blood inside the rifle was never challenged by the Crown. Well Ralph, I can't really put this nicely - but to me you display all the characteristics of a paedophile. Not only that, but you are recorded as taking part in organised cyber stalking. In your haste you made mistakes Ralph, you continue to make them - I guess being a pedo supporter uncovers part of your personality and predilections that you can't help but reveal. Get help, and go away.
Ralph Taylor suggests the thread is about "defending the good name and character of Robin Bain" and implies that anyone doing otherwise is in some way trespassing.
ReplyDeleteWho does he think he is? In fact, the thread - like any other thread on the TM message boards - is about whatever the posters wish to contribute. There is no ownership of threads, nor moderation except by TM admin.
As for people posting and not posting: many may not wish to be associated in any way with the obnoxious, bigoted, malicious spite displayed on those threads, or the harm they have done.
One day Ralph Taylor and his comrade-in-filth, Mike Stockdale, along with those pulling their strings might realise that all they have achieved is to dig themselves deeper. When it is proved beyond all reasonable doubt that Robin Bain was the culprit (as it will be)...what then?
No doubt they will continue to rant and rave and deny, while the puppeteers do their best to distance themselves. I hope they are all prosecuted, every last one of them, and the contemptible puppeteers (and yes, we know who you are, you pulling the strings!) revealed for who and what they are.
Yes Spectator, his defence of the 'good name' of Robin is very offensive to people that believe that Robin was the killer, and he has no territorial right over TM threads or over the reputation of Robin. I have my opinion of Robin based on facts and circumstances that would negate any claim of defamation he might have had against me if he were alive so I find no reason to retreat from them because he's dead and some old gumboot has a different opinion, and one which I believe is not indicative to a wholesome attitude toward children.
ReplyDeleteThey may run when it is proved that Robin was the killer, for my own part I believe it has been soundly proved even by the rudimentary and clear evidence of a rising trajectory shot to his head.
As to your point about them all being prosecuted, as you'll see in the foregoing post I believe they are. Because they are the writers they have to justify the truth in what the 2 ps published - it seems in law their no distinction between the writer and the publisher. I believe we will see a lot of them dragged to court.
Ralph Taylor, jeeves, has delusions of granduer. I should imagine JFRB is his whole life and he dreams of 'winning' and being famous before his final demise!
ReplyDeleteObviously too old to understand technology and how the internet works. He is able to understand the word opinion though, and that's where he's posting. He gets to give his opinion, and gets to received ours in return. Clearly he's a giver but not a taker.