has just worked out that belonging to a hate-site, being suspected that she was involved in electoral fraud or saying that she is (or is not) a law graduate in public is certainly not the ticket into local body politics or for admission to the bar.
Oh dear how sad. Talk to your old pal kalpal, she's the one that dragged you into it - maybe she will send you a cowpat for compensation. Cowpat compensation how nice. Cowpat Kal and moron head Dickberry, sounds kind of sweet. Love your cartoons Rachael. Found your teeth yet? If you haven't and you're starving, boil up some kumaras and suck on them.
Heaven help us all if this woman is doing a law degree!
ReplyDeleteHer latest post on TM waffles on for several ungrammatical, poorly punctuated paragraphs, riddled with the usual fatuous 'lols'. But this sentence betrays her thorough lack of understanding:
"...it is a inquisitorial system that we need, where the Judge can ask for clarification of evidence and ask questions directly of witnesses".
Rachael, in our system, the judge and the jury can and do ask questions of the witnesses for clarification. During the Bain trial, this happened on numerous occasions: notably with the judge asking for clarification of the meaning of the blood in the barrel.
You are forming your opinions based on ignorance, spite and half-understood or distorted facts. This is why the hate-siters are so poisonous.
She is certainly a work in process isn't she? Waikato Hospital couldn't really call her a successful 'brain transplant' recipient afterall. Maybe they forgot to put one in, I'll get could Goodnewsguy to go through the rubbish at the local tip to see if was thrown out.
ReplyDelete