I think an expert witness can state facts within their area of expertise, of course with the qualifications appropriate to any assertion of 'fact', but not 'facts' about the 'ultimate question', i.e. guilt or innocence.
Any ideas about what's holding up the compo case? Do you think all the relevant information is yet in the public domain? I don't. This is a chch thing, so there are aftershocks to come. Everyone is advised to have their legal emergency survival kit on hand.
Quoteobook (165 ) 9:43 pm, Thu 30 Sep #27964
This fat-butted, moon face from Dunedin, now hiding in West Auckland, defamed the Jury and Joe Karam at length. He thinks he has got away with it. This fat-butted wanted to be 'boxer' reckoned that defaming people on the internet was nothing less than a 'chat in the pub.' Two weeks ago Judge Harvey said that it was nothing of the sort and that it fitted the form of a common publication (of any description) in a vast network controlled by the laws of defamation and stalking.
Make sure your own 'legal emergency survival kit' is on hand sausage head. Good luck with that, take some tissues with you, and a wailing kit. You're making progress on the Moron of the Week ticket.
When are that lot going to get it through their very thick heads that the compensation claim is being decided already, by people who fortunately, have enough sense not to be influenced by the rantings and ravings of a few obsessed fanatics that feel they've been hard done by because their friends and relations were proven wrong or even liars, in the retrial.
ReplyDeleteThey must be frantic knowing they've been unable to find a loose nut to ply away and make a hole big enough to gain a view into the proceedings.
Rumour has it that loose nuts are going to be the least of their worries soon.
Yes, I'm sure they are interested beyond reason which is not difficult for them as they have no reason. All the law in all the world supports compensation for David and 20 nuts-loose fanatics shall merely be a side dish - I can't wait.
ReplyDelete