Anonymous said...
A person who posts nothing but innuendo and abuse, is someone so insecure in what they believe, they don't trust themselves enough to present an argument.
Last night was a perfect example by Kalnovitch. Exactly what did this embittered woman have to say or add? Nothing! Just a series of acknowledgements of other posts and a number of mindless abusive comments.
As Eric Hoffer once said, "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength".
Who does she think she is fooling?
Kalvonitch is trying to climb her way up the stalking ladder, she knows bitterness will not be enough. Her tactics seem to be to fool the quarter wits and half wits ahead of her on the ladder so as to lift herself out of the no wit category. At this point she hasn't succeeded, most probably because it's very difficult to trick half wits because by the time you've reached the trick word used in the simple sentence you're are explaining to them they've forgotten the context and what the sentence was about anyway.
I see that Kal was again attacking the victims in order to protect them, citing as proof that the suggestion that Laniet was not scared of her father as proof there was no incest. Of course anybody with any life experience would see the trappings of the 'changed' relationship between father and daughter, one that David had, somewhat naively, characterised earlier on as being that Laniet, 'got money and rides' from Robin. By the time she was sixteen, more worldly, and disengaged from feeling the rights of child to be love and protected by the child's parents, she may have simply viewed Robin, and her relationship with him, as an 'expedient' to having money and getting by in life. Kalnovitch, sad soul that she is, passes the classic observation, that an incestuous 'relationship' is attended by fear, when that is not necessarily always the case - particular when one party has matured into their own life as Laniet had done fleeing as if a refugee from a stolen childhood, returning only to profit for herself or in sadder moments to lament about what had been lost and which could never be returned.
The relationship between Robin and his daughter, was sufficient for the young Stephen to note "there is something funny about Laniet and Dad, they carry on like Mum and Dad should".
ReplyDeleteObviously it was not a relationship of fear, and why would it be? This was a young girl who was never taught usual boundaries. Her induction into human biology began early, with practical demonstrations from Mum and Dad. As she grew, it is possible the roles within the relationship with her father, changed, and as Robin lost his control of the other roles in his life, he also lost control over Laniet's affections.
This must have had a strong effect on his self esteem, and mental state. Having previously been ejected from the marital bed, Laniet may have been the only bright spot, in a world he was becoming increasingly hopeless in.
Which brings me back to Kal. In her little world, there appears to be only black and white. But it's not the 'black and white', or the right and wrong of who killed the Bain's.
Like Robin, it's the cut between hopelessness and control. In one world she feels one, and knows she has lost the other. To compensate in the cyber world, she backs the team that will give her the control she desires, but struggles to diguise the hopelessness.
It is a sad struggle, that like Robin's, will have multiple victims, including herself.
So what are the motives of the stalkers, the persecutors? Why do they do what they do? Who are they? What do they have to gain? A poster on TradeMe has just pointed out that their professed reasons don't tally with the focus on Robin Bain alone. So who are these people, what have they got to gain from David being thought guilty by the public? Who can perceive themselves damaged by Robin's guilt? What are their connections with the case?
ReplyDeletedogs run in packs and kalnovitch is no different except her pack are those loopy mongrels at the hate sites. She's a doggie farmer so she totally gets the pack mentality.
ReplyDelete"He that lieth down with Dogs, shall rise up with Fleas."
It is not the fear of fleas that Kalnovitch's pack need to worry about. Their recent statements regarding hotel guests, defames the entire jury, as they are specific with their repeated allegations.
ReplyDeleteDefending 12 defamation cases, would cause far more irritation that a dose of fleas.