Congratulations to therafter, thereafter becoming the newest hate-site member. Special thanks to Kalnovitch for passing on the information as I like to keep up to date with the hate-sites and their members.
Posting here T&C of the the particular hate-site of the stalker Curran -
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any laws be it of your country, the country where “guilty.freeforums.org” is hosted or International Law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that “guilty.freeforums.org” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered to being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent, neither “guilty.freeforums.org” nor phpBB shall be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised.
I'm just wondering how old Annie believes that she can prevent legal entry into her site under Court Order to uplift hateful material intended to vilify others, promote stalking of others, defame others and so forth. Perhaps she is confused by thinking that she is immune to NZ law. That wouldn't be unlikely as she has shown confusion over the most simple matters for a long time. I guess if the Cyber Crime Unit came calling Annie would get her gun and say hold up there fellas, this is a private hate-site and when the cyber police said don't be silly Annie, she'd burst out crying and hand everything over and go for a plea bargain.
I wonder if old Annie (rhymes with something that begins with f - but I won't say it) has worked out that material is leaking from her site, and that much of the material is defamatory and identifiable under the Harassment Act 1997. I don't think so because she's, well - she's thick. Other material coming into free cyber space from that site is identifiable as criminal stalking under S 6 (2)d. of The Harassment Act 1997. I wonder if old Annie understands that as the originating publisher of defamatory material she is responsible. I wonder if old Annie has even got a brain.
I may yet post some material from the free forums hate-site. Should I decide to of course I'll not post anything which is defamatory of others, or which can't be shown as true - of course that narrows down the options because hate sites, by their nature, proliferate such material to hurt, harass, molest and defame others. Anyone who has something they would like to bring to my attention about Annie and Kalnovitch's site please forward it on, along with your position of whether it should be published here - note of course any published material will be scrutinised to ensure it's content is true, not defamatory, and not designed to engender hate. Thanks.
Just want to let you know that jaybee51...someone you asked about a few years ago...is posting on twitter as jaybee5151 and as jaybee51 at www.perugiamurderfile.org on the Amanda Knox case. She believes Amanda and Raffaele are guilty, I do not. This jaybee person states that her son was in Perugia before Ms Kercher was murdered and knew the only person in jail for the crime, Rudy Guede. Does the Guilty freeforum still exist? Would like to see what Ms Black has had to say. Recently or not. She has entered the Devils hideout at the above addy! lol
ReplyDeleteThat's the way the sisters work, they all 'know' something that us mere mortals don't. They are able to stitch together layer of fantasy upon layer of fantasy as though it is pure silk expecting all the while to create some wondrous thing of beauty but when the spell is broken they find they have only a pig's ear which unfortunately, for them, matches their snouts.
ReplyDelete