Old rach, is reventing herself. There's a new donkey in her life called dumbo, who dicklehead membery has 'associated' with behind the barn and anywhere else available, all the while discussing the next mayoral campaign and how dickhead might rort the system once again. It's so sweet.
I will be interested in the compensation bid process. Has anyone else followed one closely? It has to almost be like a mini trial but just 'on the papers'. I think that is the term. Nice without lawyers interjecting
Quotegoldnkiwi (629 ) 9:41 pm, Sun 8 Jan #72
For those that have forgotten Rachael Membery is a law graduate who sued her father and was investigated when 'standing' for the mayoral seat in Otrohanga but not in the usual 'position.'
Oh Rach, your such a funny moron - I could just give you a big bale of hay and a carrot.
I've started this blog to share with those that may be interested in sports, books, topical news and the justice system as it applies to cyberspace and generally.
Sunday, January 8, 2012
Pedo pal: Ralph Taylor trying to fiddle his way in.
We are all entitled to an opinion and there are a couple of people who are attending who in the opinion of others their innocence is open to question. Now when having an opinion is wrong?If Mr Bain is so sure of his innocence then he has nothing to fear from being open to critical scrutiny at the conference by either those attending or the media.
Edited by jeeves-50 at 1:54 pm, Sun 8 Jan
Quotejeeves-50 (10 ) 1:51 pm, Sun 8 Jan #60
Ralph Taylor laying down the conditions that he feels David Bain should expect at the pending Injustice Conference.
This is the same guy that continued to lie about the strip search of David Bain, and the blood of his father found inside the rifle barrel. He perpetuated these lies and has never retracted them. He also refused to take a bet on the validity of his claims, a man without conviction.
Now he deigns to offer what acceptable behaviour and scrutiny would be for those speaking at the conference. A liar who wants to impose conditions on others - don't think so Ralphie, like always with you - these something fiddly about that. Tut tut.
Edited by jeeves-50 at 1:54 pm, Sun 8 Jan
Quotejeeves-50 (10 ) 1:51 pm, Sun 8 Jan #60
Ralph Taylor laying down the conditions that he feels David Bain should expect at the pending Injustice Conference.
This is the same guy that continued to lie about the strip search of David Bain, and the blood of his father found inside the rifle barrel. He perpetuated these lies and has never retracted them. He also refused to take a bet on the validity of his claims, a man without conviction.
Now he deigns to offer what acceptable behaviour and scrutiny would be for those speaking at the conference. A liar who wants to impose conditions on others - don't think so Ralphie, like always with you - these something fiddly about that. Tut tut.
Saturday, January 7, 2012
Kent Parker - will he sing?
Will Parker choose to co-operate with any investigation as to who supplied his group the lies to leak to the media before, during, and after the trial? Even to co-operate frankly with Karam when Parker's defence collapses and probably tens of thousands of dollars of costs are awarded against him before he goes to trial?
Parker is in a dangerous situation now, he will be seen as a liability and be on the outer with those that might have used the gullible fool, fed his ego and presented him with 'gifts' of information to carry out his hate campaign.
I am going to present all the information I have on the hate-site activities to Justice Binnie with the request that if it is not looked into that it be referred for investigation, and that the activities at least are reflected in any recommendation for compensation.
I recall a poster michellemosse (?) addressing me on TM in the post trial fracas that she didn't want to be in the position she was in. A rather unusual thing to say, if she or he was not feeding information on behalf of the police or prosecution before and during the trial. Remember the claims that David had been involved in an unsavoury incident with a neighbour, a claim that proved to be totally untrue but that was touted by Annette Curran's group. If michellemosse (sp?) wasn't a plant it's also odd that she or he started a website during the trial which spread false information later transported to TM boards, and that she or he disappeared shortly after the trial finished. I remember the fawning praise from Annette Curran that she 'wished' that michellemosse had prosecuted the case rather than the lawyers that did. A slip of the tongue, you judge? Or maybe a recognition of the credentials or links of michellemosse on her campaign. Nina_s another who could fit that category. It becomes dangerous for them all now because when Karam's book is published all uncertainty will be gone about the innocence of David Bain and questions as to why and how it happened will bubble in the public mind.
I carry no weight in the matter, however I have said for the last couple of years that I believe people involved should come out with the truth of the sub-plot that sought to defeat the course of justice in the Bain case. Kent Parker above all others might now realise he is one of those people and that doors have slammed on him, his only currency of safety is the truth - the same goes for Annette Curran, michellemosse - who will no doubt be of interest. I remember D Cameron's claims about photos that didn't exist, Deb Coates claiming to have a copy of the autopsy report, not accidental revelations, but rather information they 'knew' and needed to explain how - in both those cases, flighty headed souls they were, used obvious lies to hide the trail. But why lie to hide the truth one must ask.
Yes, and for any hate-siters that might read this. I was wrong about the outcome of the trial, about Robin's bloody and bruised hands, the strip search of David and so on. No sorry, how silly I wasn't wrong. I also wasn't wrong that people would get their arses sued, that the hate-sites would collapse, that there would be a compensation claim. However, I might just be wrong that people are going to be called to account for the travesty of justice that was the prosecution of the Bain case - or maybe I'm not.
Parker is in a dangerous situation now, he will be seen as a liability and be on the outer with those that might have used the gullible fool, fed his ego and presented him with 'gifts' of information to carry out his hate campaign.
I am going to present all the information I have on the hate-site activities to Justice Binnie with the request that if it is not looked into that it be referred for investigation, and that the activities at least are reflected in any recommendation for compensation.
I recall a poster michellemosse (?) addressing me on TM in the post trial fracas that she didn't want to be in the position she was in. A rather unusual thing to say, if she or he was not feeding information on behalf of the police or prosecution before and during the trial. Remember the claims that David had been involved in an unsavoury incident with a neighbour, a claim that proved to be totally untrue but that was touted by Annette Curran's group. If michellemosse (sp?) wasn't a plant it's also odd that she or he started a website during the trial which spread false information later transported to TM boards, and that she or he disappeared shortly after the trial finished. I remember the fawning praise from Annette Curran that she 'wished' that michellemosse had prosecuted the case rather than the lawyers that did. A slip of the tongue, you judge? Or maybe a recognition of the credentials or links of michellemosse on her campaign. Nina_s another who could fit that category. It becomes dangerous for them all now because when Karam's book is published all uncertainty will be gone about the innocence of David Bain and questions as to why and how it happened will bubble in the public mind.
I carry no weight in the matter, however I have said for the last couple of years that I believe people involved should come out with the truth of the sub-plot that sought to defeat the course of justice in the Bain case. Kent Parker above all others might now realise he is one of those people and that doors have slammed on him, his only currency of safety is the truth - the same goes for Annette Curran, michellemosse - who will no doubt be of interest. I remember D Cameron's claims about photos that didn't exist, Deb Coates claiming to have a copy of the autopsy report, not accidental revelations, but rather information they 'knew' and needed to explain how - in both those cases, flighty headed souls they were, used obvious lies to hide the trail. But why lie to hide the truth one must ask.
Yes, and for any hate-siters that might read this. I was wrong about the outcome of the trial, about Robin's bloody and bruised hands, the strip search of David and so on. No sorry, how silly I wasn't wrong. I also wasn't wrong that people would get their arses sued, that the hate-sites would collapse, that there would be a compensation claim. However, I might just be wrong that people are going to be called to account for the travesty of justice that was the prosecution of the Bain case - or maybe I'm not.
Friday, January 6, 2012
John Poynton - Greek themes.
Hi,
These are images of the paintings and the signature of one of them. My pictures don't do them justice. I "repatriated" them from California! Talk about global art...
Best Regards,
Pandos
P. S. The inscription in Greek reads "3rd Rate Coffee Shop". There was a time in the 60's and 70's when, to get a license to operate a coffee shop in Greece, you were put in a category according to facilities provided to the public. 3rd Rate was the lowest.
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Scratch that publication date for Karam's new book.
I said March, but the booksellers are advertising the date as February 2012. No wonder Parker has disappeared and is trying to hand over the reins to 'dickhead Vic' Purkiss.
I'll take a punt and say that Parker and Purkiss's 3rd defence will be struck out soon, if it hasn't already and the award of costs due against them will knock them out for all time - defamation charges and all.
Note worthy to remember that Karam has in fact paid for assistance to Parker and Purkiss by virtue of the fact that his lawyer has set out for them how a defence must be structured, this was noted in the judgement which struck out their second defence. What kind of bludgers are these dudes, begging for money and in need of advice from the other party's solicitor?
Also noteworthy to remember that Karam was a fullback, an All Black fullback - the guy at the back, the last man defending the try line, someone operating alone and often against the odds, a whole team at times depending on him. Drink to that you scornful hate-siters Parker and Purkiss. You were warned and went on ahead full of bluster and bravado - now you are too scared to face the man you mocked.
On another note, the new book is already pre-selling.
I'll take a punt and say that Parker and Purkiss's 3rd defence will be struck out soon, if it hasn't already and the award of costs due against them will knock them out for all time - defamation charges and all.
Note worthy to remember that Karam has in fact paid for assistance to Parker and Purkiss by virtue of the fact that his lawyer has set out for them how a defence must be structured, this was noted in the judgement which struck out their second defence. What kind of bludgers are these dudes, begging for money and in need of advice from the other party's solicitor?
Also noteworthy to remember that Karam was a fullback, an All Black fullback - the guy at the back, the last man defending the try line, someone operating alone and often against the odds, a whole team at times depending on him. Drink to that you scornful hate-siters Parker and Purkiss. You were warned and went on ahead full of bluster and bravado - now you are too scared to face the man you mocked.
On another note, the new book is already pre-selling.
Thursday, December 29, 2011
A note for Parker watchers.
Kent Parker has been flat out on Trade Me defaming others at will, whilst claiming to be defamation expert. I'll grant that because he is facing 100s of defamation charges, and has had 2 defences rejected by the Court, he is a expert in defaming but hardly on the subject of defamation.
More material has come to light on Parker and his lonely hearts club that I will publish in the new year. For avid watchers of him no surprises really, just shooting himself in the foot and one would suspect, again, that he's attempting a defence of insanity. Oh well, at least he's entertaining now that his kitten claws have been trimmed.
Looking to see the links between Parker and vanbeynan and what recommendations may come from that when Justice Binnie gets to review them. Could be night night Kenty and Marty.
Happy new year to the good guys and the bad guys! (just to be nice.)
More material has come to light on Parker and his lonely hearts club that I will publish in the new year. For avid watchers of him no surprises really, just shooting himself in the foot and one would suspect, again, that he's attempting a defence of insanity. Oh well, at least he's entertaining now that his kitten claws have been trimmed.
Looking to see the links between Parker and vanbeynan and what recommendations may come from that when Justice Binnie gets to review them. Could be night night Kenty and Marty.
Happy new year to the good guys and the bad guys! (just to be nice.)
Hello out there.
I'm continuing with a few days off but for those interested, add that I have recieved the Greek themed sketches by John Poynton from Pandos and will get them up as soon as I can. I also have another painting of John's which I will put up, it's the first I've owned of his although there are others in the family.
Cheers for the new year.
Cheers for the new year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


