Stockdale, jeeves 50 and goldnkiwi - paedophile apologists?

Why? Did someone say that in Papua New Guinea everyone molests children? I recall saying that, it would have been hard to keep the kids dressed in a Western fashion in the heat when their friends were not and that the housing was not likely to be the most private, I think if it is the same conversation that Centrepoint was brought up as an analogy, ecause you called someone Mr Potter, if that is the conversation to which you are alluding. Any way what is it in your reckoning that makes one a JFRBer, merely posting that Robin didn't commit suicide, is that sufficient? I do have to say that you seem to see paedophiles everywhere, if you are a 'professional' may I suggest that you heal youself before practicing on any one else. paedophiles seem to be your bogey man.

Edited by goldnkiwi at 3:56 pm, Wed 8 Sep

Quotegoldnkiwi (607 ) 3:51 pm, Wed 8 Sep #25982

and again,

Did someone say that in Papua New Guinea everyone molests children? I recall saying that

Then Stockdale, first not a paedophile apologist, followed by agreement he is,

And I am not a paedophile apologist either,project,and I am not a supporter of a multi murderer ,either.
Actually,pro,an apologist is someone who explains or defends something by reasoned argument,so I will accept that word,as it certainly relates to me.

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 4:21 pm, Wed 8 Sep #25991

Then questioning that they're not paedophile apologists

Not pedeophile apologists ? There is no direct evidence of this from first hand accounts like David.Only second hand heresay.When did David state his father was a pedeophile?

Quotejeeves-50 (3 ) 3:07 pm, Wed 8 Sep #25971

There is a pattern emerging here folks, 3 of the same merry band, all hate-siters all offended that Robin is called a paedophile, then mitigation by them of the circumstances of his paedophilia. This follows the earlier post (recorded below) in which Stockdale 'explains' his views on what most people would consider paedophilia.


There were a few posts yesterday about the suppressed evidence,or evidence that the judge would not allow the jury to hear,if you like.
Now one witness said she recalled Arawa telling her about putting her finger in her vagina and that her father had shown her how to do do this.
Well,he may have.He may have shown her how to put her finger in her vagina.Some people take that to mean he put his finger in her vagina.
Karam said,in that debate with Laws,"That the fact of the matter is that it seems very clear now that Mr Robin Bain was molesting his other daughter".So he must take that view.
Look,the Bain children ran around naked in PNG.I daresay Robin Bain could have pointed to David Bain's penis and said that is called a penis.That does not mean he was molesting David.
I know that most of us find this behaviour strange.Maybe even all of us.But in PNG the Bain's were known for their strange behaviour as regards to sexual matters.
But that does not mean that anyone was molesting anyone.

Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 9:43 am, Sat 4 Sep #24897

There has long been a defensive attitude from the 'love Robin's' on the issue of incest, that often seemed to have been driven by something sinister, over the last few days, and yesterday in particular, it seems goldnkiwi, jeeves50 and Stockdale have lulled themselves into the belief that their views are generally held and therefore not offensive. They now present as apologists for paedophilia, persecutors in the name of paedophilia - a message for the few that signed their rotten petition, this cell, cult, are sick, sick people.