a rifle barrel, the mass of air displaced with the bullet is immediately replaced by the force of atmospheric pressure. This pressure is not selective and draws the immediately available air into the vacuum of the barrel instantly. The source of the air is that most immediately available. In the case of Robin Bain's suicide the air most readily available to relieve the vacuum in the barrel contained the high speed spatter from the contact wound to his head, this was already driven toward the silencer tip as it exited from his skull. That is how his dna was found inside the rifle, his blood was taken by atmospheric pressure because it was in the air immediately available to the rifle barell, right at the tip of the silencer Robin rested his head against.
The clear science of Bain's suicide is apparent, nothing in science can contradict that he suicided. There was no gravity fed blood found in the rifle Robin killed himself with, no slow motion of his death and the expulsion of his blood from his skull, it was high speed spatter, capable of passage into the barrel and onto the curtains, not slowly falling drops, but blood and brain matter drawn in where he had rested his temple against the barrel. Bring out your science hang-bainers, enough of your crap and Bryan Bruce documentaries about photo-copiers. Front up you un-homed dogs of mixed breeds.
Showing posts with label Blood in the rifle barrel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blood in the rifle barrel. Show all posts
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Look, dopey sophey, the beekeeper William Rodie has confessed..
William Rodie always knew daddy's blood was in the rifle but it took him 16 years to confess....
Nana this is a first for me as I have never entered into discussion about the blood in the barrel, "whats the point" the reason I have not done that is because Robin was shot at point blank range so that is why there was blood in the barrel, the person who said there was blood in the barrel also said that in his opinion Robin Bain did not shoot himself, so of course all the blood in the barrel proves is that Robin was shot at very close range, which is something all of us understand. And by the way I am still waiting for your reply on this question' "who testified about David driving without his glasses, or was this just a figment of your imagination?
Quotesophier8 (1 ) 5:40 pm, Tue 23 Nov #30789
Thanks for that Willie, I hope you don't mind me calling you by your boy name instead of your girl name. But Willie, I must be old fashioned because I just think of your as old Willie fiddler. I bet you think that's so nice that you just want to have a jam tart, all sweety, sweety, widdle fiddle, widdle fiddle. And that's such an important confession you've made that you knew all along that it was point blank range shot even though the Crown experts were saying it was long range. I know what you mean Willie buddypal. However, little willie you've recorded that the person who you 'now' say said there was blood in the barrel also said that Robin did not shoot himself. But that's a lie isn't willie. Just a fat big lie by a widdle fiddler. You're just a big lying beekeeper William Rodie, get use to being caught out. Then I might call you 'caught out willie' or cow for short, that'll be jolly jolly.
Nana this is a first for me as I have never entered into discussion about the blood in the barrel, "whats the point" the reason I have not done that is because Robin was shot at point blank range so that is why there was blood in the barrel, the person who said there was blood in the barrel also said that in his opinion Robin Bain did not shoot himself, so of course all the blood in the barrel proves is that Robin was shot at very close range, which is something all of us understand. And by the way I am still waiting for your reply on this question' "who testified about David driving without his glasses, or was this just a figment of your imagination?
Quotesophier8 (1 ) 5:40 pm, Tue 23 Nov #30789
Thanks for that Willie, I hope you don't mind me calling you by your boy name instead of your girl name. But Willie, I must be old fashioned because I just think of your as old Willie fiddler. I bet you think that's so nice that you just want to have a jam tart, all sweety, sweety, widdle fiddle, widdle fiddle. And that's such an important confession you've made that you knew all along that it was point blank range shot even though the Crown experts were saying it was long range. I know what you mean Willie buddypal. However, little willie you've recorded that the person who you 'now' say said there was blood in the barrel also said that Robin did not shoot himself. But that's a lie isn't willie. Just a fat big lie by a widdle fiddler. You're just a big lying beekeeper William Rodie, get use to being caught out. Then I might call you 'caught out willie' or cow for short, that'll be jolly jolly.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Getting that pesky blood out of the barrel.
I might later post the number of posts from Taylor, Stockdale and Trevor arsew.pe showing how they got the blood out of the rifle - they lied about it. They claimed it wasn't even there, they deny the evidence of notes relating to the finding of extensive blood inside the barrel because they know it destroys their case on which they justify calling Joe Karam a liar and which 'allows' them (in their own minds) to continue to persecute David Bain. But for now I'll simply post the question the Judge asked on the matter, and the answer he was given. The Judge did refer to the blood inside the barrel (a fact not contested by the Crown) because it can be assumed he understood the absolute importance of it, or indeed if it could 'survive' an explosion of gunpowder, heat and the velocity of a slightly oversized projectile bearing over it at speed and with full contact.
questions from the court: 3653 -54
Q. One of those Mr Ross, I take it that if there's blood in the barrel it would have to be from the last firing of the rifle that it was vacuumed in?
A. It is far more likely sir because of the movement of the gases, the bullet is designed that it fits very, very snugly into the barrel so any biological material would largely be removed, so it really comes down to the final shot.
The pattern and the science doesn't change, either does the direction = Robin the killer.
questions from the court: 3653 -54
Q. One of those Mr Ross, I take it that if there's blood in the barrel it would have to be from the last firing of the rifle that it was vacuumed in?
A. It is far more likely sir because of the movement of the gases, the bullet is designed that it fits very, very snugly into the barrel so any biological material would largely be removed, so it really comes down to the final shot.
The pattern and the science doesn't change, either does the direction = Robin the killer.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Mike Stockdale, still a filthy liar...
The filthy liar persists....
ash204 wrote:
OH, AND ALL THIS FROM A BOY WHO DOESNT BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY BLOOD IN THE BARREL!!
There was no blood in the barrel of the rifle,according to the ESR scientist who checked it.
But as I have just pointed out,for the umpteenth time,it makes absolutely no difference to the fact that David Bain murdered his family.
Edited by supersleuth at 10:00 pm, Wed 3 Nov
Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 9:53 pm, Wed 3 Nov #29137
What only part of the evidence says...
Peter Ross, p3653-3654
A. It wasn’t provided to me, so it’s something which I haven't seen.
Q. If the case note records that, “Blood was found on the silencer, extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,” that’s what it’s saying here. Does that accord with the answer you gave Mr Mander in relation to the vacuum effect and hard contact wound?
A. Oh it does, it indicates that, I mean, there are a number of people who have been shot. It indicates that at least one of those suffered a relatively hard contact wound.
So the Court Record is wrong according to the Stockdale because he talked to the scientist whose notes record 'extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,' but who no according to Stockdale can't remember his own notes. Sure.
Extensive smearing showing that Stockdale is an extensive liar, an old pedo-apologist fool. He wouldn't take a bet because he's a gutless coward, he knows he's peddling lies and that it is the intention of the pedo-sects to protect the memory of one of their own. It's self-interest lies to cover up what they can't hide. The more they do to 'protect' the memory of Robin Bain at the expense of his own wife and children, the more they expose his memory as a fiddler.
As it transpires, the single evidence of the blood in the barrel was sufficient forensic proof to prove that the family deaths were murder and the death of Robin suicide. The police rushed in before evaluating all the evidence carefully and deliberately, they were looking for a quick fix or perhaps to have information buried from public sight. The Crown have never independently resolved the issue of the blood in the rifle because they can't without acknowledging it proves suicide. For those that may not know, none of the above quoted evidence (and there is a lot more) was called or challenged by the Crown - they ignored it from the safety of silence. As far as I know not one newspaper detailed the evidence, except for the brief touching upon it by the Judge in his closing address. That is a frightening thought, that the most significant evidence was never published. Even the 'great' and 'experienced' jury stalker van beynan dared not touch upon it in discredited 'opinion' piece in The Press.
I have some doubts that some of the investigating staff understood the significance of extensive blood in the barrel, and really they should have had specialists help with that, if not from the ESR then from overseas where the phenomenon is more readily understood and catalogued - then the country would not have had to go through this saga, David would have been left alone as was his right, and we would never have seen exposed pedo-cults led by 1/2 brained idiots like Stockdale and Parker covering up for one of their own.
ash204 wrote:
OH, AND ALL THIS FROM A BOY WHO DOESNT BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY BLOOD IN THE BARREL!!
There was no blood in the barrel of the rifle,according to the ESR scientist who checked it.
But as I have just pointed out,for the umpteenth time,it makes absolutely no difference to the fact that David Bain murdered his family.
Edited by supersleuth at 10:00 pm, Wed 3 Nov
Quotesupersleuth (0 ) 9:53 pm, Wed 3 Nov #29137
What only part of the evidence says...
Peter Ross, p3653-3654
A. It wasn’t provided to me, so it’s something which I haven't seen.
Q. If the case note records that, “Blood was found on the silencer, extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,” that’s what it’s saying here. Does that accord with the answer you gave Mr Mander in relation to the vacuum effect and hard contact wound?
A. Oh it does, it indicates that, I mean, there are a number of people who have been shot. It indicates that at least one of those suffered a relatively hard contact wound.
So the Court Record is wrong according to the Stockdale because he talked to the scientist whose notes record 'extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,' but who no according to Stockdale can't remember his own notes. Sure.
Extensive smearing showing that Stockdale is an extensive liar, an old pedo-apologist fool. He wouldn't take a bet because he's a gutless coward, he knows he's peddling lies and that it is the intention of the pedo-sects to protect the memory of one of their own. It's self-interest lies to cover up what they can't hide. The more they do to 'protect' the memory of Robin Bain at the expense of his own wife and children, the more they expose his memory as a fiddler.
As it transpires, the single evidence of the blood in the barrel was sufficient forensic proof to prove that the family deaths were murder and the death of Robin suicide. The police rushed in before evaluating all the evidence carefully and deliberately, they were looking for a quick fix or perhaps to have information buried from public sight. The Crown have never independently resolved the issue of the blood in the rifle because they can't without acknowledging it proves suicide. For those that may not know, none of the above quoted evidence (and there is a lot more) was called or challenged by the Crown - they ignored it from the safety of silence. As far as I know not one newspaper detailed the evidence, except for the brief touching upon it by the Judge in his closing address. That is a frightening thought, that the most significant evidence was never published. Even the 'great' and 'experienced' jury stalker van beynan dared not touch upon it in discredited 'opinion' piece in The Press.
I have some doubts that some of the investigating staff understood the significance of extensive blood in the barrel, and really they should have had specialists help with that, if not from the ESR then from overseas where the phenomenon is more readily understood and catalogued - then the country would not have had to go through this saga, David would have been left alone as was his right, and we would never have seen exposed pedo-cults led by 1/2 brained idiots like Stockdale and Parker covering up for one of their own.
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Proof positive or proof negative?
I asked that earlier, pointed out that I could merely have been 'gambling' on any of the hate-siters not being about to come up proof that there was no blood in the rifle and silencer.
But proof positive is here...in part the evidence that does 'not exist,' that is apparently a myth made by the 'myth makers.'
Peter Ross, p3653-3654
A. It wasn’t provided to me, so it’s something which I haven't seen.
Q. If the case note records that, “Blood was found on the silencer, extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,” that’s what it’s saying here. Does that accord with the answer you gave Mr Mander in relation to the vacuum effect and hard contact wound?
A. Oh it does, it indicates that, I mean, there are a number of people who have been shot. It indicates that at least one of those suffered a relatively hard contact wound.
But proof positive is here...in part the evidence that does 'not exist,' that is apparently a myth made by the 'myth makers.'
Peter Ross, p3653-3654
A. It wasn’t provided to me, so it’s something which I haven't seen.
Q. If the case note records that, “Blood was found on the silencer, extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,” that’s what it’s saying here. Does that accord with the answer you gave Mr Mander in relation to the vacuum effect and hard contact wound?
A. Oh it does, it indicates that, I mean, there are a number of people who have been shot. It indicates that at least one of those suffered a relatively hard contact wound.
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Wiping out the barrel
Rifling Impressions
A bullet is slightly larger in diameter than the bore diameter of the barrel in which it is designed to be fired. The bore diameter is the distance from one land to the opposite land in a barrel. As a result, a rifled barrel will impress a negative impression of itself on the sides of the bullet like those seen below.
Very high pressures are generated within a firearm when a cartridge is discharged. These pressures force the bullet from the cartridge case and down the barrel at very high velocities. When a firearm is discharged, the shooter will feel the firearm jump rearward. This rearward movement of the firearm is called recoil. Recoil is for the most part caused by the cartridge case moving rearward as an opposite reaction to the pressures generated to force the bullet down the barrel.
This is why the blood in the barrel couldn't survive a rifle discharge and proves that it was Robin's dna found there after the last shot, the evidence of which (the dna) was located and given by Hentschell. It is the sort of thing I would have thought most people would know but then again twisted sisters are not 'most people,' fortunately. For anybody so bewildered, bullet projectiles are softer than the rifle bore which why if found intact will have signs of 'rifling' or characteristics of the particular firearm they were discharged from. The generated heat, velocity, the suppressed fit of the bullet inside the barrel all contributed to the reason why the dna was placed there after the last shot drawn in both by vacuum temporarily created in the barrel by the discharge and the back pressure escaping from the wound to Robin's head.
A bullet is slightly larger in diameter than the bore diameter of the barrel in which it is designed to be fired. The bore diameter is the distance from one land to the opposite land in a barrel. As a result, a rifled barrel will impress a negative impression of itself on the sides of the bullet like those seen below.
Very high pressures are generated within a firearm when a cartridge is discharged. These pressures force the bullet from the cartridge case and down the barrel at very high velocities. When a firearm is discharged, the shooter will feel the firearm jump rearward. This rearward movement of the firearm is called recoil. Recoil is for the most part caused by the cartridge case moving rearward as an opposite reaction to the pressures generated to force the bullet down the barrel.
This is why the blood in the barrel couldn't survive a rifle discharge and proves that it was Robin's dna found there after the last shot, the evidence of which (the dna) was located and given by Hentschell. It is the sort of thing I would have thought most people would know but then again twisted sisters are not 'most people,' fortunately. For anybody so bewildered, bullet projectiles are softer than the rifle bore which why if found intact will have signs of 'rifling' or characteristics of the particular firearm they were discharged from. The generated heat, velocity, the suppressed fit of the bullet inside the barrel all contributed to the reason why the dna was placed there after the last shot drawn in both by vacuum temporarily created in the barrel by the discharge and the back pressure escaping from the wound to Robin's head.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)