Anonymous said...
I think you will find a certain writer from the Press may have been involved with them gaining the trial transcript. There has been stalking of the jury and also witnesses and there is a definite link between supersleuth and others with a certain reporter from the Press.
September 13, 2010 7:42 PM
That writer of course, we can tell from the public record, could well be van beynan. I expect if it isn't he will go on record and say so, and to explain any contact with Parker, Purkiss, Stockdale and others. He might also explain his conduct that caused a Juror to complain of harassment from him. That could be interesting.
Who knows, it's possible that old kenty baby and vic superlips were merely conduits, seduced by the idea of recognition and importance, to do the dirty work.
For some reason these idiots seem to think there is something hidden in the trial transcripts that has been deliberately kept hidden from them.
ReplyDeleteHave they forgotten the verdict?
Those transcripts, and what they contain, is what enabled the jury to find David Bain not guilty.
It doesn't matter how they care to dissect them, or attempt to understand them, unless they use their well worn trick of misrepresenting them (which is incidently illegal under the Summary Procedings Act) there is nothing for them to gain by having them.
There is however much for anyone who opposes that group to gain. Lots of laughs. This group has constructed their whole criticism, including their website and spent thousands of dollars, all without actually seeing the actual evidence (transcripts).
That knowledge will certainly assist Joe Karam in any defamation hearing.
Sitting back and not contributing is like watching an episode of Fawlty Towers, it just gets more pathetic, but funnier, by the minute.