The demented world of Kent Parker and Melanie White.

Money Invention. Of course last year Kent announced a 'musical' tour to raise money, something along the lines of a Dave Dobbyn tour over the xmas break. What obviously didn't occur to Parker (and this shows the extent of his disorders) that he's not Dave Dobbyn, he's neither a recognised musician nor singer, he doesn't have a single record and outside the circle of his hate-sites he is virtually unknown apart for bizarre interest in how a mad man falls and burns. He's a consummate and practiced liar, unfortunately he lies to his handful of supporters in a blatant way, and they, showing similar mental incapacity, believe each one. His attendant friend the desperate and lonely Melanie White supports him in all he does not realising for a minute that kent has long since crossed over to being a dangerous messenger of hate. White sees no reason to object when Parker lies, she has long since crossed the line from decency to a twi-light world that lies and stalking are okay for those who are enlightened by the truth. A mother herself, she has never objected to the attacks Parker and his cohorts like the very sick Christine Williams have made on the families and children of those that object to the persecution these people seethe. Similarly, when Annette Curran and Glenda OBrien, Maryanne Newton, joyously discovered personal details of opponents or their families to exchange or harass, Parker, the dangerous and demented fool, had neither the decency or moral definition to protest at either the wrongness of such acts or to express or comprehend how such acts would soon make it seen, across a broad section of society - the hate and dangerousness of these people.
Before moving on from this, one thing that has struck me over the last few years, is the comparison between the hate-siters and some very tough and dangerous individuals I've known in my life. Apart from one or 2 exceptions there has been generally a rule in times of violence or potential violence to leave families and children out of it. Then I consider the rabid enthusiasm of the hate-siters to even go on line and threaten children and families, Christine Williams even threatening to take children away. Think about that folks and see the bankruptcy of decency and soul in these people and realise why they must be fought. Even years after a trial they still twist the evidence and lie - good people, with good causes absolutely never do that, nor even consider stalking the vulnerable.

Character Invention.
Much fuss was always made about this by the hate-siters, but when, thanks to Annette Curran, a raft of information leaked on line we found out that the hate-siters encouraged one another to have fake identities, realised that the 'venerable' Glenda OBrien was also, as suspected 'laddiefatcat,' that Christine Williams adopted the identity of her own daughter as did the beekeeper William Rodie, who incidentally is even using a fake identity on JFRB and Counterspin of Bob Smith which might be a cover for the introduction of 'leaked' material - but the results of that remain part of another story. Not at all ironically, OBrien, Williams and others used their fake identities to get back on line to immediately start threatening their targets - lost to them in their anger that it was a give away, and that additionally much of what they were intending to do was being pre-advertised by Curran herself.
But to more recent times, indeed the last few days. Kent Parker has become Andrew MacKenzie and Melanie White has become Harriet Bond. Just consider for a moment the credibility of a hate-site administrators who not only condone false identities but go on to assume such themselves. In this case they'll no doubt sign their own petition to add to the many other times they have signed it, but as an indication of inanity of all of this they even 'like' their own comments on a forum where they have been spamming lies. And like everything they do covertly, they betray themselves and their shredded credibility without thought.
These are the people that talk about Justice for Robin Bain, they see Justice as not needing truth, something to be arrived at with hate and lies, something that allows the utilisation of attacks on innocent people or children with no interest or even awareness of the case of the dead and disgraced father.

Kent Parker - what's the best he can expect?

Well, it's looked grim since his 2nd defence was rejected in the High Court and the Judge indicated a raised payments of costs to Joe Karam on the basis that Parker hadn't presented a defence, hadn't got over the first hurdle of being able to convince the Court that he had grounds of defence that would warrant a trial. The Judge also directed that submissions be made regarding costs to that point some 6 months ago, raised as a penalty factor that Parker hadn't shown a credible defence for a 2nd time despite advice and some assistance from Karam's counsel in order to quickly finalise what is a fairly clear case against Parker.
So in order, even if Parker were successful finally, in filing a legitimate defence, the preceding procedures would have to be settled before any trial could commence. Looking at that, and reading the Judgement it is unlikely that Parker will make the threshold of proving a defence which might be why he has no lawyer willing to act for him, he possibly has already sought legal aid. But that problem is secondary now, because the costs of his efforts so far have been found against him.
He will not be able to proceed to trial, even by some miracle a defence that hasn't been visible for some years suddenly appears, until he has settled the costs. Why? I think because he is shown as unable to pay the costs to date, Karam will make demand for payment as he is entitled. Parker might then try to seek legal aid, convince the Courts of merits in his case which have been already rejected twice (probably count three as most likely,) of which of course he has no chance. Meanwhile the legal aid authority are not able to give assistance in a defence that has no merit, and in Parker's case, which has already been rejected 2 (3) times. In effect Parker is sunk. I don't think there will ever be a trial, it's all over Rover since the Judgement dated 29th July 2011.

Look, it's rachael dickleberryhead... trying to pretend she isn't a lawyer.

Old rach, is reventing herself. There's a new donkey in her life called dumbo, who dicklehead membery has 'associated' with behind the barn and anywhere else available, all the while discussing the next mayoral campaign and how dickhead might rort the system once again. It's so sweet.

I will be interested in the compensation bid process. Has anyone else followed one closely? It has to almost be like a mini trial but just 'on the papers'. I think that is the term. Nice without lawyers interjecting


Quotegoldnkiwi (629 ) 9:41 pm, Sun 8 Jan #72

For those that have forgotten Rachael Membery is a law graduate who sued her father and was investigated when 'standing' for the mayoral seat in Otrohanga but not in the usual 'position.'
Oh Rach, your such a funny moron - I could just give you a big bale of hay and a carrot.

Pedo pal: Ralph Taylor trying to fiddle his way in.

We are all entitled to an opinion and there are a couple of people who are attending who in the opinion of others their innocence is open to question. Now when having an opinion is wrong?If Mr Bain is so sure of his innocence then he has nothing to fear from being open to critical scrutiny at the conference by either those attending or the media.


Edited by jeeves-50 at 1:54 pm, Sun 8 Jan


Quotejeeves-50 (10 ) 1:51 pm, Sun 8 Jan #60

Ralph Taylor laying down the conditions that he feels David Bain should expect at the pending Injustice Conference.
This is the same guy that continued to lie about the strip search of David Bain, and the blood of his father found inside the rifle barrel. He perpetuated these lies and has never retracted them. He also refused to take a bet on the validity of his claims, a man without conviction.
Now he deigns to offer what acceptable behaviour and scrutiny would be for those speaking at the conference. A liar who wants to impose conditions on others - don't think so Ralphie, like always with you - these something fiddly about that. Tut tut.

Kent Parker - will he sing?

Will Parker choose to co-operate with any investigation as to who supplied his group the lies to leak to the media before, during, and after the trial? Even to co-operate frankly with Karam when Parker's defence collapses and probably tens of thousands of dollars of costs are awarded against him before he goes to trial?
Parker is in a dangerous situation now, he will be seen as a liability and be on the outer with those that might have used the gullible fool, fed his ego and presented him with 'gifts' of information to carry out his hate campaign.
I am going to present all the information I have on the hate-site activities to Justice Binnie with the request that if it is not looked into that it be referred for investigation, and that the activities at least are reflected in any recommendation for compensation.
I recall a poster michellemosse (?) addressing me on TM in the post trial fracas that she didn't want to be in the position she was in. A rather unusual thing to say, if she or he was not feeding information on behalf of the police or prosecution before and during the trial. Remember the claims that David had been involved in an unsavoury incident with a neighbour, a claim that proved to be totally untrue but that was touted by Annette Curran's group. If michellemosse (sp?) wasn't a plant it's also odd that she or he started a website during the trial which spread false information later transported to TM boards, and that she or he disappeared shortly after the trial finished. I remember the fawning praise from Annette Curran that she 'wished' that michellemosse had prosecuted the case rather than the lawyers that did. A slip of the tongue, you judge? Or maybe a recognition of the credentials or links of michellemosse on her campaign. Nina_s another who could fit that category. It becomes dangerous for them all now because when Karam's book is published all uncertainty will be gone about the innocence of David Bain and questions as to why and how it happened will bubble in the public mind.
I carry no weight in the matter, however I have said for the last couple of years that I believe people involved should come out with the truth of the sub-plot that sought to defeat the course of justice in the Bain case. Kent Parker above all others might now realise he is one of those people and that doors have slammed on him, his only currency of safety is the truth - the same goes for Annette Curran, michellemosse - who will no doubt be of interest. I remember D Cameron's claims about photos that didn't exist, Deb Coates claiming to have a copy of the autopsy report, not accidental revelations, but rather information they 'knew' and needed to explain how - in both those cases, flighty headed souls they were, used obvious lies to hide the trail. But why lie to hide the truth one must ask.
Yes, and for any hate-siters that might read this. I was wrong about the outcome of the trial, about Robin's bloody and bruised hands, the strip search of David and so on. No sorry, how silly I wasn't wrong. I also wasn't wrong that people would get their arses sued, that the hate-sites would collapse, that there would be a compensation claim. However, I might just be wrong that people are going to be called to account for the travesty of justice that was the prosecution of the Bain case - or maybe I'm not.

John Poynton - Greek themes.

Hi,

These are images of the paintings and the signature of one of them. My pictures don't do them justice. I "repatriated" them from California! Talk about global art...

Best Regards,

Pandos


P. S. The inscription in Greek reads "3rd Rate Coffee Shop". There was a time in the 60's and 70's when, to get a license to operate a coffee shop in Greece, you were put in a category according to facilities provided to the public. 3rd Rate was the lowest.

Scratch that publication date for Karam's new book.

I said March, but the booksellers are advertising the date as February 2012. No wonder Parker has disappeared and is trying to hand over the reins to 'dickhead Vic' Purkiss.
I'll take a punt and say that Parker and Purkiss's 3rd defence will be struck out soon, if it hasn't already and the award of costs due against them will knock them out for all time - defamation charges and all.
Note worthy to remember that Karam has in fact paid for assistance to Parker and Purkiss by virtue of the fact that his lawyer has set out for them how a defence must be structured, this was noted in the judgement which struck out their second defence. What kind of bludgers are these dudes, begging for money and in need of advice from the other party's solicitor?
Also noteworthy to remember that Karam was a fullback, an All Black fullback - the guy at the back, the last man defending the try line, someone operating alone and often against the odds, a whole team at times depending on him. Drink to that you scornful hate-siters Parker and Purkiss. You were warned and went on ahead full of bluster and bravado - now you are too scared to face the man you mocked.
On another note, the new book is already pre-selling.