The hate-siters, who really is to blame?

Imagine a group of folks who are never happy unless they're unhappy. Or putting it another way, who can't be happy without being unhappy. It's a state of mind. A miserable state of mind that sees no good unless it relates to somebody suffering and which can then can be 'down loaded' by the viewer of the misery with a good dallop of hate. Discharging hate in such a way is pleasurable, of course only a temporary pleasure because as most people know a deep well of hate can't be emptied by off loading onto others. It takes courage to deal with the hate of oneself. Rather than being a vehicle for hate, in so much that as much as hate can be 'transferred' no void is created because fresh hate is generated in its place.

So it's a cycle of hate, a person never being happy unless they're down loading onto others. It's a hiding thing   as well, because although people who hate will join 'together' they're merely combining their hate into a safe fortress that they believe won't be, or can't be challenged. Safety in numbers results from the combining, also there is the confidence and 'pleasure' that they'll go unchallenged for what ever they say or do among their peer group. I think I have described the Bain 'hate' cultists. After 3 to 4 years experience I can say that I have never seen on a message board or within their own various hate-sites such 'Guilty Free Forums,' JFRB or Counterspin any hate-siter remonstrating with others for being untruthful for plotting against people, stalking or making threats. That is clearest evidence of all that the 'cults' are open to all and the only requirement is hating David Bain, Joe Karam and in some ways unfortunately, people seen to be 'supporting' them.

The word 'support' is loaded with meaning for a hate-siter, it can mean as little as being unsure about evidence in the Bain case, or merely being interested in the Law and logic applied to the case. It is as termed in the early american 'gangster scenes' of the mid 1900 of 'if they're not for us, then they're against us.' So clearly a hate-siter or what he or she does or says is not to be questioned or you are against them. That means in my case at least everything possible will be done to hurt me or my family. Only a deeply troubled mind, one in fact filled with hate, could possibly extend malice in such a way and then employ from a familiar 'tool kit:' lies and false allegations. The 'false allegations' are of the type used to justify the anger employed. For example we have Kalnovitch claiming for as long as possible that I sent her a threatening letter, then when the letter is published on here, and else where, and is seen to be moderate in tone and conciliatory  it suddenly becomes a 'letter' to her daughter and quite quickly soon after another letter in her imagination. So the proven formula, lies then 'justified' hostility.

The same with Christine Williams in various disguises claiming to be threatened by mail, and from memory a 'mystery' phone call. That this apparently happened after Williams had threatened to send gang member 'relations' to my home, abduct my children (by saving them in her deeply disturbed threats) was therefore somehow justified, by what, the same tools as always invention and lies. When Annette Curran's hate site leaked through google and all the 'hidden' information of 'right thinking nzers' emerged, the claim was that the site had been 'hacked.' Again, no embarrassment about plots to make false complaints about others, to stalk them and so on - just protests of how the information 'escaped.' A familiar pattern, no self analysis, but simply blame and hate. Which I think brings arrival to a inescapable point: will the hate-siters ever achieve anything to their satisfaction.

I think the answer is no, no person can be a willing vessel for hate and expect happiness, a sense of achievement or satisfaction. That is the reason why as all else has failed there is no relief in sight for the hate-siters, it's not just the pending court cases it's the fact that David Bain has become untouchable to their hate, effectively that has endured for a long time, the last time of any significance that the hate crew were able to land a 'blow' was martin van beynan's bizarre question at the Perth Justice Conference. Even the most recent rehashes of 'old and re-invigorated' arguments in light of the Judicial Review have made no impact, just as they have never made an impact since the failed re-trial. The truth has escaped and is living free of the hate-siters. The question of compensation is important, obviously of critical importance to the hate-siters because they have lost all else. Presuming for a moment compensation was not granted, would that be a victory for the twisted sisters?

The answer is no because unfortunately David has been found not guilty and there is no going back on that. There is nothing to be achieved whether David gets a payment or not for the hate-siters, because all they have, and ever have had, is a bond in hate, the product of which is their own self-inflicted misfortune. When I wrote to Kalnovitch pointing out that she had submerged herself into something from which their was no benefit I was referring to the pointlessness of embracing hate and disguising it with lies, that hasn't changed compo or no compo.