Friday, March 23, 2012

Hate siters - busy stalking.......

Look what the cat dragged in......



Kent Parker Given that his comments use the same language as the blog, it is pretty dumb for him to try and deny!
8 hours ago ·  · 2
·  
Vic Pur Also knowing the exact amount of costs against him is a good indication who .... really is.
8 hours ago ·  · 3
·  
Christine Williams Not to mention the ' Kenty ' bit.
8 hours ago ·
·  
Harriet Bond you should out them to Oz media while you are at it, the Perth in particular :)
6 hours ago ·
·  
Kent Parker Yes, that is the plan. If you want to help with that then register at counterspin where we are discussing it.
6 hours ago ·
·  
Harriet Bond long registered :)
6 hours ago ·
·  
Kent Parker I see they deleted the entire thread. Not before it was read no doubt.
3 hours ago ·
·  
Denise Cameron Damn. I was too late. Any chance of you repeating your outing of ...... for those of us who missed it Kent??? Or maybe someone saved the thread???
about an hour ago ·
·  
Vic Pur Try posting under another topic already running.
about an hour ago ·
·  
Mel White SHOW ME AND LET ME RELISH
16 minutes ago · 

7 comments:

  1. They are like pathetic little children but Kent must love the way the girls swoon over him, "yes Kent, no Kent", Puke! There is a reason why most of them are alone Kent, think about it!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The most interesting thing for me is the construction and support of the stalking down a often walked track for the hate-siters. It's one of the better examples of their dirty work, and I note the word 'out' and is in 'outing' the attack against the person threatening or defeating their arguments of persecution.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One of them has posted that part of the (imaginary) 'plan' was to wear a poorly-fitting jersey, belonging to his elder sister, in order to demonstrate later, at trial, that the jersey didn't fit.
    And then the poster asks himself a question, as in "one wonders why the father's jersey wasn't worn...?"
    That poster also has suggested that the (imaginary)
    'plan' included racing home to start a computer, and then going back to the street to wait for a (possible) witness, who may or not drive past, and then to turn his back on the potential witness.
    If this poster was on a 'team', the captain would tell him to shut up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would that be the same poster who thinks Dr Pryde took penile swabs etc, yet didn't ask David to take his shirt off?
      I wonder if he has attempted to ring Dr Pryde? Yes, we know he is dead, but that wouldn't stop a silly old man who has nothing better to do with his life, would it? Perhaps he could ring one of Dr Pryde's family, they might know.

      Delete
    2. The captain is unable to tell anybody to shut up because they will not listen. The captain also is using a defence that he couldn't removed allegedly defamatory material from his site without 'approval' of the members. The fact that no such provisions apply, except in his imagination, goes unnoticed by him. It also goes unnoticed by the members that the captain is essentially say that all his members are responsible for the defamation because they didn't vote to remove it.

      Delete
    3. The Crown couldn't put the scratches on David chest at a time contemporary to the murders, they know and accept he's not guilty.

      Delete
  4. Yes, the same poster now has admitted his 'oncoming dementia'.
    I guess at least he's made the 1st step of admitting he has problems.

    ReplyDelete