Kent Parker - will he sing?

Will Parker choose to co-operate with any investigation as to who supplied his group the lies to leak to the media before, during, and after the trial? Even to co-operate frankly with Karam when Parker's defence collapses and probably tens of thousands of dollars of costs are awarded against him before he goes to trial?
Parker is in a dangerous situation now, he will be seen as a liability and be on the outer with those that might have used the gullible fool, fed his ego and presented him with 'gifts' of information to carry out his hate campaign.
I am going to present all the information I have on the hate-site activities to Justice Binnie with the request that if it is not looked into that it be referred for investigation, and that the activities at least are reflected in any recommendation for compensation.
I recall a poster michellemosse (?) addressing me on TM in the post trial fracas that she didn't want to be in the position she was in. A rather unusual thing to say, if she or he was not feeding information on behalf of the police or prosecution before and during the trial. Remember the claims that David had been involved in an unsavoury incident with a neighbour, a claim that proved to be totally untrue but that was touted by Annette Curran's group. If michellemosse (sp?) wasn't a plant it's also odd that she or he started a website during the trial which spread false information later transported to TM boards, and that she or he disappeared shortly after the trial finished. I remember the fawning praise from Annette Curran that she 'wished' that michellemosse had prosecuted the case rather than the lawyers that did. A slip of the tongue, you judge? Or maybe a recognition of the credentials or links of michellemosse on her campaign. Nina_s another who could fit that category. It becomes dangerous for them all now because when Karam's book is published all uncertainty will be gone about the innocence of David Bain and questions as to why and how it happened will bubble in the public mind.
I carry no weight in the matter, however I have said for the last couple of years that I believe people involved should come out with the truth of the sub-plot that sought to defeat the course of justice in the Bain case. Kent Parker above all others might now realise he is one of those people and that doors have slammed on him, his only currency of safety is the truth - the same goes for Annette Curran, michellemosse - who will no doubt be of interest. I remember D Cameron's claims about photos that didn't exist, Deb Coates claiming to have a copy of the autopsy report, not accidental revelations, but rather information they 'knew' and needed to explain how - in both those cases, flighty headed souls they were, used obvious lies to hide the trail. But why lie to hide the truth one must ask.
Yes, and for any hate-siters that might read this. I was wrong about the outcome of the trial, about Robin's bloody and bruised hands, the strip search of David and so on. No sorry, how silly I wasn't wrong. I also wasn't wrong that people would get their arses sued, that the hate-sites would collapse, that there would be a compensation claim. However, I might just be wrong that people are going to be called to account for the travesty of justice that was the prosecution of the Bain case - or maybe I'm not.