Saturday, November 19, 2011

A dribbling hate-siter called bj.

What an unfortunate choice of name for the internet.

Anyway although the reaction to the news that an eminent jurist has been appointed to review David Bain's compensation claim has been fairly muted compared to earlier extremes it seems some of the hate-site members are beside themselves with rage. Thus, with frustration that their campaign is in tatters, that members have left in their droves leaving others facing 100s of charges and ongoing inquiries into allegations of threats, defamatory harassment, jury harassment and so forth this sick soul reverts to type - lies.

and the death certificate for Robin Bain says 'murdered' not 'suicide'.


Quotewelshdude (304 ) 6:07 pm, Sat 19 Nov #34

This former and discredited claim was once a rousing point for the demented few. Any reasonable person would realise that a death certificate isn't proof of murder in any situation, particularly not when no one has been convicted of the self-inflicted death of the family murderer Robin Bain. However, the truth is that the death certificate states benignly that Robin died as the result of a gun shot wound. So when they have nothing they invent things. Of course invention isn't proof of anything other than frustration of being unable to accept the truth. However, as I have written before, the persecution David Bain has faced is likely to be a contributing factor in determining what any compensation amount may be. One of the results of David's false imprisonment on biased, and in other cases with held evidence, was an actual Miscarriage of Justice that has already been ruled by the Privy Council. Not withstanding that, as reported in the foregoing blog, the persecution continued into the 2nd trial and after - particularly on Trade Me where the publishers allowed all manner of lies to be published in what were often Contempt of Court situations. David Bain may yet have the final word on that, or in fact some other judicial authority if, as I anticipate, the whole spectrum of what constituted the way the law and the internet was misused by idiots such as above to harass with lies and abuse David Bain as an enduring Miscarriage of Justice was weighed against him.

Interesting to note that it is only the hate-siters that sought to avoid the compensation inquiry, only they that are afraid of what the results might be. Bain's lawyer, the Queens Counsel Michael Reed, has expressed his confidence leading into this inquiry by someone who has been described as a 'star' of the legal system. Someone unlikely it can be presumed, to be anything other than disgusted that the media and dimwits with the unfortunate name of bj (welshdude) facilitated persecution by printing anything mindless idiots could think of even when the trial was under way.

2 comments:

  1. But they 'know' David was guilty!
    First it won't go past the Privy Council. But then it did: a substantial miscarriage of justice had actually occurred.

    Then he won't get acquitted at retrial because of the 'mountain of evidence' against him. But then he was, as the 'mountain' was shown to be an artificial mound of inaccuracies and oversights. And we got 'not guilty' x 5

    Then the release of the suppressed evidence: suppressed because it was garbage. But oh, the relief - they know he's guilty! They swallowed it.

    Then the Martin Van Beynan piece: poorly reasoned, misleading, incomplete and deeply biased. But they seized on it: "see, we knew he was guilty!"

    Then the the prediction that David wouldn't go for compensation because they 'know' he's guilty and would quit while ahead. Oh, but then he did...

    Then the prediction that the claim for compensation would not be allowed because they 'know' he's guilty. But now the announcement of the appointment of an eminent overseas judge, free of contamination and the NZ old boys' network, to assess the claim.

    And now we have predictions that Binnie will be swayed by the same nonsense that they have been so committed to. So they pin their hopes on empty nonsense such as imagined wording of a death certificate!

    What IS it with these people? They cast around, accusing Joe Karam, Michael Reid and others of all sorts of ridiculous illegal and immoral actions. They get themselves into costly legal action; they open themselves to ridicule by their actions; they hassle official bodies; they defame, stalk, interfere in something that they don't understand.

    Well, here's a prediction: When Binnie finds for David Bain, as he surely must on the evidence and history, there will be a hullabaloo of accusations and justification. I predict they will not believe Binnie's assessment and will remain firmly convinced that they, and they alone, see the thing clearly. But will they ever realise that they see it through years of distortion, poor media reports and personal vendettas?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well put.

    For the ultimately irony of how these nutters think, consider that Kent Parker now implies that the defamation case proceeding against him is also a victory. Also note the enduring lack of interest of his fellows in Kent's case as a sign of 'I'm glad it's not me.'

    Is that frantic sound of scribbling on paper arising from Dunedin Melanie White - writing another confession to send to Justice Binnie?

    Imagine the introductions...
    Counsel for the Crown, Counsel for Mr Bain,
    and the people in the straighjackets with frothing mouths?
    ummh, oh....
    Psychiatric patients on day-therapy, Mr Parker, Melanie White and Annette Curran to the fore.

    ReplyDelete