Rachael newberry, dickleberryhead - a law graduate

asks where is the evidence?

possible, maybe, similar, hearsay, allegations, no conclusive evidence, no cat or dog prints, suggestions, not confirmed,.............etc where is the proof, all just playing with words, everything having a proviso. Where is the evidence? Perhaps it was in the 'suppressed report', perhaps these grey areas could have been put to rest once and for all if its' findings had been put before the jury. Perhaps that would have been 'conclusive'.
Quote
goldnkiwi (611 ) 6:30 pm, Wed 23 Mar #31871

Well dear dickleberry you must have been asleep when you went to law school, or maybe day-dreaming about, well .... donkeys. If you'd been awake, or not playing with yourself in the back row and making lots of eehaw noises you might have heard that 'where is the evidence' is the onus placed on the Crown to prove the charge. I know that's a lot to absorb in one go, and I don't want to put pressure on your asinine, mouse-sized brain, in a donkey head, but that is what the Jury asked the Crown, and concluded to respond 'not guilty' five times over. Just imagination yourself five times over, if there is a paddock big enough, and you would realise you'd be sated with the truth, as the Jury were that the answer to the question to the Crown of 'where is the evidence' was responded to with no meaningful weight.