Stockdale, evidence is good.

TM Admin

This idiot Stockdale continues to harass another poster.
He is bringing forward old quotes from the poster, some months old, republishing them without the dates as if they are current.
This poster has previously warned the poster he now harasses that he will continue to stalk them.

Here follows the url and 2 of today's 'crop' of 4 'new' posts, followed by the original threat.
TM are abetting him in his endeavours.
But first the original threat to harass from Stockdale directed at this poster on June 13th 2010.
It is no small point that the poster cybernana, who is a prolific trader on TM, should be able to use the boards according to her own will and not on the demands of a menacing, no trade, hate-site administrator.

You won't get away from old sleuth,cyber,no matter which thread you are on.Go back to bainaholics and see if you can answer any of those 10 questions I put to you yesterday.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 11:13 am, Sun 13 Jun #728

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Community/MessageBoard/Messages.aspx?id=132231&p=314&topic=7

cybernana wrote: Do you also believe a glass lens could have lain on that floor, close to where the body had been moved from, where Weir said he found it, and not been broken? With 4 days of people in there searching? Beats me how that could happen.
cyber,Weir made a note on his jobsheet that he found that lens under the toe of an ice skating boot.So that lens was more or less protected by that boot. But what puzzles me is that you have also said that lens was dusty,and so must have been there for a while.So you would also have to wonder why it had not been broken,having lain on the floor for so long. And you say four people were in there searching.But the whole house was a crime scene ,not just that room.
Edited by supersleuth at 8:57 am, Sat 5 Feb
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 8:55 am, Sat 5 Feb #15683

cybernana wrote:
Let me see... you have now accepted there was blood on the shoe, after denying it for so long. Now, see if you can find, from the transcript, which direction those blood spots landed from, I believe it was the wrong direction for it to have come from his own left side.
Well,in the Karam/Laws debate Karam said those blood spots were from Robin Bain's head wound,which was in his left temple. So what direction do you think they came from,cyber?.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 9:14 am, Sat 5 Feb #15684

cybernana wrote:
Was it noted on his drivers license? Was that produced in court? Who saw him driving in them the night before? Did the people who served him at the fish & chip shop testify they had seen him wearing them?
Yes,it was noted on David Bain's drivers licence that he needed to wear glasses when he was driving. But we don't know if he was wearing glasses when he was driving or not.He wasn't seen driving. And he may well have taken those glasses off before he went in to get those fish and chips.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 9:45 am, Sat 5 Feb #15685