No ,ta,you are lying about David Bain being strip-searched.You know full well that nobody has ever said that they saw him being strip-searched.Dr Pryde never said that,and I bet if you were to ask D/S Dunne or Constable Van Turnhout,who were in the room with David Bain when Dr Pryde examined him,they would tell you he was not strip searched.And what is more,David Bain knows he was not strip searched.Dr Pryde asked him about those bruises on his head,and asked him if he had any other bruises.He wouldn't have asked him that question if he had strip-serached him,because he would have seen those other marks.
Quote
supersleuth (0 ) 1:52 pm, Wed 15 Dec #14790
The above is one example of the 100s of times he has made this stupid claim. He doesn't have the brains to work out that proving David had the scratches on his chest the morning of the killings would have been helpful to the Crown Case. But they never proved it, not one person attending the scene made the claim. Not one Crown witness claimed David Bain was never strip searched, but the records of the examination and at least two police officers confirmed it. It would take an ex girlfriend to make a claim about the scratches days after the murders, backed up by a prison officer who only took 15 years to 'remember.'
Repeat, not one witness attending the scene, or the examination of David saw any scratches. To now say that is the defence's fault because they didn't ask some question or answer is pathetic and prejudicial. But it goes further the Crown never contested that there had been a strip search and that equally proves that it happened. Idiot Stockdale, a pedo-apologist, proven liar and stalker suggests that the Crown were happy to sit on their hands over the issue which most damning to their case. The fact they chose not to challenge it was because it was true, no more or less, David Bain was strip searched and no evidence of scratches on his chest were recorded, not in the first trial or the second.
You are a lying piece of crap Stockdale without the necessary intelligence to understand the illogical rantings you construct. Much like your idiotic assertion that Mrs Laney was a defence witness. You're a sheer idiot.
No comments:
Post a Comment