Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Proof positive or proof negative?

I asked that earlier, pointed out that I could merely have been 'gambling' on any of the hate-siters not being about to come up proof that there was no blood in the rifle and silencer.

But proof positive is here...in part the evidence that does 'not exist,' that is apparently a myth made by the 'myth makers.'



Peter Ross, p3653-3654

A. It wasn’t provided to me, so it’s something which I haven't seen.
Q. If the case note records that, “Blood was found on the silencer, extensive smearing and traces of blood were also found inside the barrel, positive,” that’s what it’s saying here. Does that accord with the answer you gave Mr Mander in relation to the vacuum effect and hard contact wound?
A. Oh it does, it indicates that, I mean, there are a number of people who have been shot. It indicates that at least one of those suffered a relatively hard contact wound.

2 comments:

  1. Well, well, well. Tut tut tut. Dear oh dear.
    Wonder how Sluperdoof will lie his way out of this one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Probably by lying his way into another one. So much for the horse's mouth, plop, plop, ploppity plop.

    Oh my goodness, heck, - hate-site members these days! Old Annie probably got a feeling in her nether regions for the first time in years, well, it's not what you think Annie - you just crapped yourself - live life, swap knickers with Kalpal, hers are full of cowpats.

    ReplyDelete